If Arsenal had a spine of Reina, Carragher and Mascherano, they'd probably win the league. I was watching Lassana Diarra yesterday for Pompey and he was easily their best player. It's criminal that Chelsea and Arsenal didn't give him much playing time as he is comfortably good enough to play for a top four side. In fact, if we didn't have Mascherano, I'd be desperate for his signature.
I've said it before, but the thing that amazes me is Wenger's policies in the transfer market. I mean, how do you judge what a manager does when buying players? Is buying a failure worse than not prioritising on the positions you're in desperate need of improvement? There is no doubting Walcott and Nasri can become great players, but they cost a combined total of over £20m. Manchester United overpaid for Hargreaves, but signing a player like him would have been more beneficial for Arsenal. Same goes for Mascherano. Who, for the record, signed for a similar fee that they spent on Eduardo Da Silva.
Anyone with any knowledge of football could see Pires, Ljungberg, Henry, Wiltord, Bergkamp and whoever else is remembered would not have had the same freedom without a fantastic backline and the defensive cover of Patrick Vieira. I think Vieira's days were numbered and selling him might not have been the end of the world for Arsenal, but why didn't they get a proper replacement for him? That's what confuses me as it is clear they are not far off being a fantastic side.
Denilson, Nasri, Rosicky, Van Persie, Walcott, Fabregas, Adebayor etc are all great players, but without someone who'll roll their sleeves up and get stuck in, they won't win a thing.