Punishing Everton and Forest is one thing. Neither club ever challenges to win top honours in the past 25 years. However City pose a dilemma for the PL.
We suspect that City have been at it since 2008. If the PL were to find them guilty of financial doping especially over a prolonged period of time it would call into account the very sporting integrity of the PL given how much City have won since 2008.
I think this terrifies those that run the EPL. The whole validity of the PL would be left in tatters if the truly held City accountable for their financial shenanigans.
Not sure that's entirely fair on the PL. The charges only arose because of the hacking/leaks. You could argue we've known from the start that there was dodgy stuff going on but knowing it and having the evidence to prove it are not the same.
It's dragging on so long because the PL are being super careful to make sure their case is watertight - Uefa got embarrassed by their case being thrown out by CAS on technicalities and the PL don't want the same to happen to them.
The good news is that those technicalities don't apply in the PL and there's no right of appeal to CAS.
The bad news is that the sources of evidence are a bit hooky so City will feel they can challenge the case on those grounds - which is why they have refused to cooperate.
Cycling bounced back from the Armstrong scandal, I'm sure football would be able to survive any fallout from punishing City. I think the risk of reputational damage (among fans like us, for example) is far greater if they DON'T punish them.