Hayes and Melber are decent, I'll give you that. Scarborough (when he curbs the condescension) is somewhat palatable. But O'Donnell and Maddow are absolutely horrendous mate. Their desperation for a Trump conviction radiates off them so profusely that I honestly wouldn't be surprised to see them break down in tears of joy if he was sent down. Embarrassing pair of plebs
As for Kirschner, he may have some prosecutorial stripes, but you can't tell me he hasn't crossed over into the "info-tainment" world. I've lost count the number of times I've seen him predict all kinds of legal "home runs" against Trump only for most of them to turn out to be complete and utter bollox. Don't forget to like and subscribe though, because "Justice Matters". Yeah, righty-o Glenn
I might get pounced on for saying this, but it's my belief that while Trump is undoubtedly an unscrupulous individual, who has repeatedly transgressed the law, I do not believe the degree of his guilt (or the seriousness of his crimes) are anywhere near as consequential as Maddow, O'Donnell, Kirschner et al would have you believe. Dare I say it, they're just as responsible for eroding the middle-ground and whipping people into frenzies as anyone on the opposite side
DISCLAIMER: I massively dislike Trump. Always have and still do.
Only point I can agree with is Kirschner. Maddows is superb, articulate bringing together old evidence and new evidence to give the full picture to prove why Trump is corrupt as well as a dangerous traitor. she has a superb memory, imo one of the best around, it's easy to comment on new evidence, remembering old evidence that's also relevant to the point she is making puts her in a different class to most political commentators.
Am not shocked at your opinions as there are many people around the world who can't see very dangerous psychopathic narcissistic fascists for what they are, sad would be a better word, you think Trumps offences aren't that serious.?
He had his contingency plan ready to over turn any election loss before any votes were cast. he put it into action as the election results came in during election night. his plan was to set up the election was stolen attacks to seize control of the country, he then placed the lives of many senior government politicians lives in danger to silence any opposition to him seizing control. he conspired with many to try and seize control of the country. all failed so he incited rioters to violently attack the heart of the Government, the Capital building. he then threatened more senior politicians who refused to go along with the next part of his plan to over turn the government.
I can't think of any other crime so serious, the implications of what he was doing don't bear thinking about.
Maybe that's the problem. it's something many of us can't comprehend, how can people still not see just how his serious his crimes are. to sum him up as unscrupulous sounds more like a defence rather than a opinion on the severity of his crimes, what next, yeah he was unscrupulous, yeah he was bad but many people are bad, that doesn't mean they did anything wrong in the eyes of the law.
