Alot in the article is right, but...
This article is so contradictory. Us supporters want us to spend more on wages and get the best players in the transfer window, yet we want lower prices for tickets. Sadly the two do not go hand in hand, the money for these wages and transfer fees has to come from a variety of sources.
I know how it feels as I cannot afford to go to games from London, let alone manage to get a ticket, been trying for two years to get tickets and take my mum to a game as she has never been to anfield, but is a life long avid supporter like myself (although my season ticket holding cousins could make more of an effort to help out I am sure). Just because I live in London does not make me lesser of a supporter, but local supporters seem to have a view that anyone who lives outside of Merseyside, is somehow less of a supporter than those who live within the vicinity of the club. Funnily enough we still hurt as much as anyone when we lose.
I totally agree in relation to the stadium, we needed a far larger development so an allocation of cheaper and easier to come by (lottery system maybe) tickets were available each game. But FSG took the easy path developing Anfield on the cheap, as they knew the fans would support this. We desperately needed a stadium we would struggle to fill for the lesser games so demand and supply would dictate lower prices for these games and the stadium would end up full.
As for the Real Madrid games, FSG can hardly be at fault for those performances.