I get what you're saying. I still believe there's no need for him to associate his name with greed. There's no need for it. Just call the club out for lacking ambition, and that he wants to win. That would get the press on his side, and put the heat on FSG/LFC . Instead, he's putting the heat on himself from fans, media and maybe the club. It would also help alleviate the pressure from Rodgers, as it the public opinion would be swayed to believe this is a failure of ambition by FSG, rather than a concoction of other issues.
Unless there is an undercurrent amongst players in and outside of Liverpool that they want top level talent, but do not want to pay for it.
All across the world right, labor rights-wages-union breaking measuring are punching bags for capital, but when an 20 year old up-and-coming young fellow takes on what he has in the last year, he is seen as greedy.
We might remind ourselves what took place at Hull with the Spirit of Shankly group. Only through changing one's reaction to power will things change. Again, I could be wrong, but no one has been more important to Liverpool's chances this year and it just so happens he is up for contract in a couple years. This is called leverage. And what does he know that he did not at the beginning of the season when he said he would have happily signed?
Who was it that called for the club to tie down their stars of the future? Yes, in the fall it was Stevie G (do not know if it was before or after his announcement he was leaving), but I would not be surprised if Stevie knew how this whole thing might end. He's been there and done this before --- not his first state fair.
Also, by making it about money publicly, it places Rodgers in a neutral position (as we have heard him spout FSG's policy about Raheem the year before).
Its a stretch, but it fits more with what I have been following on this saga than the simplistic sensationalism which is to paint him and punish the 20 year old with the label of a greedy fucker....