If you’ve got a number of top class players, you tend to use trophies and achievements to sort them out. And....well, you know. I mean Matt Le Tissier was pretty awesome but you’d likely get laughed out of whatever room you were in if you compared him to other PL legendary attacking midfielders.
Kane hasn’t really done...anything. Apart from score lots of goals (yeah I know...).
But yeah, at risk of derailing the thread again I’ll stop. But just for clarity, anyone even comparing Harry Kane to Dennis Bergkamp let alone trying to argue that he’s better is completely batshit crazy or stupider than stupid.
you have the audacity to call me crazy? And then post that?
Comparing Kane to Matt Le Tissier?
You actually don't need trophies to sort top class players out. Gerrard hardly had a cabinet of PL medals did he? What about Shearer?
Anyone who starts bringing up trophies to prove the validity of their wrong opinion is clueless. Suarez was clearly one of the best strikers in the world when he left Liverpool and he'd won fuck all. Bale was clearly one of the best attacking wide players in the world when he left spurs and he'd won fuck all.
Kane is clearly one of the best strikers in the world and he has already scored the numbers of goals to put him in the elite bracket. He needs one more PL goal to be the only striker since Shearer and Henry to score over 25 goals in three consecutive seasons.
So when I say Kane is a better striker than Torres or Bergkamp ever was, I think you need to accept that. It's not some out there opinion. Kane will go down as a legendary striker.