Author Topic: Wikileaks:  (Read 131094 times)

Offline BoRed

  • BoRing
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 15,024
  • BoRac
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #560 on: March 22, 2011, 10:50:37 am »
Really? I expect it would be even easier to kill some people and not take photos of your mates posing with the corpses, like they were trophies or something.

Never mind the photos, they actually kept some body parts as trophies.

Offline BIGdavalad

  • Major Malfunction. Yearns To Be A Crab! MOD Agony Aunt. Dulldream Believer. Is the proud owner of a one year old login time.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 28,024
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #561 on: March 22, 2011, 10:55:48 am »
They've all been charged with murder and one's already ratted on the rest. Hopefully the animals get everything that's coming to them.
Joining Betfair? Use the referral code UHHFL6VHG and we'll both get some extra cash.

All of the above came from my head unless otherwise stated. If you have been affected by the issues raised by my post, please feel free to contact us on 0800 1234567 and we will send you an information pack on manning the fuck up.

Offline GBF

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 19,043
  • The only religion with a God that you can touch!
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #562 on: March 22, 2011, 11:03:56 am »
I wasnt defending them but they dont look right in their head and it isnt the first time that this happened.  The army/govt do need to improve the way in identifying, monitoring and treating those nut case that either join the army or those that become one within.
01111001 01101111 01110101 00100111 01101100 01101100 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110111 01100001 01101100 01101011 00100000 01100001 01101100 01101111 01101110 01100101

Offline It's Jimmy Corkhill

  • No more scrapping in Page Moss. Marxist.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 8,712
  • Hasta La Victoria Siempre....
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #563 on: March 22, 2011, 04:39:17 pm »
Should be treated like the animals they are.

Gonna take a wild guess and say the death penalty won't be handed down.

It fucking should be, though
"I'm a people man. Only the people matter".
-Bill Shankly.

Offline Kahuna{=}Berger

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,775
  • Innovate, not imitate.
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #564 on: March 22, 2011, 10:23:50 pm »
Saw this piece yesterday about a protest in support for Bradley Manning...

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Bradley-Manning-WikiLeaks-Protest-Virginia-Daniel-Ellsberg-Among-35-Arrested-Outside-Quantico-Base/Article/201103315956985?lpos=World_News_First_World_News_Article_Teaser_Region_4&lid=ARTICLE_15956985_Bradley_Manning_WikiLeaks_Protest_Virginia%3A_Daniel_Ellsberg_Among_35_Arrested_Outside_Quantico_Base

Didn't think much of it until I saw this video of the protesters...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LWdu_vaeI7c

Are the coppers acting slightly precious here, or is it just my interpretation? The protesters all look like coffin dodging peaceniks to me. What's with the physicality and arrests? 1st ammendment, and all that...

Offline CorKopite

  • a tool who can't spell
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 8,541
  • The house that Shanks built.
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #565 on: March 22, 2011, 11:03:08 pm »
Der Spiegel photos. Not nice viewing.

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,752310,00.html
:(

Absoloute scum of the highest order. RIP to the victims in those pictures. The c*nts responsible should be thrown in a small dark cell and the key thrown away. Those animals dont even deserve an easy way out with the death penalty.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2011, 11:04:54 pm by CorKopite »
Bill Shankly-"I know this is a sad occasion but I think that Dixie would be amazed that even in death he could draw a bigger crowd than Everton can on a Saturday afternoon"

Mitch Hedberg-"Dogs are forever in the push up position"

Offline Corkboy

  • Sworn enemy of Bottlegirl. The Boston Toilet Mangler. Grauniad of the Cidatel. Into kinky S&M with the Lash.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,404
  • Is it getting better?
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #566 on: March 24, 2011, 10:04:02 am »
US soldier admits killing unarmed Afghans for sport

Jeremy Morlock, 23, tells US military court he was part of a 'kill team' that faked combat situations to murder Afghan civilians

   
    * Paul Harris in New York
    * guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 23 March 2011 23.17 GMT


 US Army Specialist Jeremy Morlock, who admitted being part of the 'kill team' that murdered unarmed Afghans. Photograph: Reuters

An American soldier has pleaded guilty to being part of a "kill team" who deliberately murdered Afghan civilians for sport last year.

Army Specialist Jeremy Morlock, 23, told a military court he had helped to kill three unarmed Afghans. "The plan was to kill people, sir," he told an army judge in Fort Lea, near Seattle, after his plea.

The case has caused outraged headlines around the world. In a series of videotaped confessions to investigators, some of which have been broadcast on American television, Morlock detailed how he and other members of his Stryker brigade set up and faked combat situations so that they could kill civilians who posed no threat to them. Four other soldiers are still to come to trial over the incidents.

The case is a PR disaster for America's military and has been compared to the notorious incidents of torture that emerged from the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq. This week the German magazine Der Spiegel published three pictures that showed American soldiers, including Morlock, posing with the corpse of a young Afghan boy as if it were a hunting trophy.

Some soldiers apparently kept body parts of their victims, including a skull, as souvenirs. In a statement issued in response to the publication of the photos the US army apologised to the families of the dead. "[The photos are] repugnant to us as human beings and contrary to the standards and values of the United States army," the statement said.

Morlock has told investigators that the murders took place between January and May last year and were instigated by an officer in his unit, Staff Sergeant Calvin Gibbs. He described how elaborate plans were made to pick out civilian targets, kill them and then make their deaths look like they were insurgents. In his confession Morlock described shooting a victim as Gibbs tossed a grenade at him. "We identify a guy. Gibbs makes a comment, like, you know, you guys wanna wax this guy or not," Morlock said in the confession.

Morlock now stands to be sentenced to at least 24 years in jail but with eligibility for parole after seven years. That has come about because Morlock struck a plea bargain that will see a lighter sentence in return for testifying against his fellow soldiers.

source

Offline Wendy Baby

  • Permanently stuck in 1917.
  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 802
  • Everything is in constant movement and change
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #567 on: March 24, 2011, 11:13:50 am »
It's not a wikileaks story  it came from Der Speigal.I posted the original story and this in reply to a post from  Davas yesterday

German news group runs photos of Afghan killings

Graphic photos showing U.S. troops and dead Afghans that the Army was keeping under wraps for a war crimes probe were carried by a German news organization Monday, with one showing a soldier smiling as he posed with a bloodied and partially clothed corpse.
By GENE JOHNSON
Associated Press
SEATTLE —

Graphic photos showing U.S. troops and dead Afghans that the Army was keeping under wraps for a war crimes probe were carried by a German news organization Monday, with one showing a soldier smiling as he posed with a bloodied and partially clothed corpse.
The photos published by Der Spiegel were among several seized by Army investigators looking into the deaths of three unarmed Afghans last year. Five soldiers based at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, south of Seattle, have been charged with murder and conspiracy in the case.
Der Spiegel did not return calls seeking comment Monday, and it wasn't known how the organization obtained copies.
Editions with the photos were on newsstands Monday, a day after Der Spiegel published them digitally.

Officials involved in the courts-martial had issued a strict protective order, seeking to severely limit access to the photographs due to their sensitive nature. Some defense teams had been granted copies but were not allowed to disseminate them.

"Today Der Spiegel published photographs depicting actions repugnant to us as human beings and contrary to the standards and values of the United States Army," the Army said in a statement released by Col. Thomas Collins. "We apologize for the distress these photos cause."
One of the published photographs shows a key figure in the investigation, Cpl. Jeremy Morlock of Wasilla, Alaska, grinning as he lifts the head of a corpse by the hair. Der Spiegel identified the body as that of Gul Mudin, whom Morlock was charged with killing on Jan. 15, 2010, in Kandahar Province.
Another photo shows Pvt. 1st Class Andrew Holmes, of Boise, Idaho, holding the head of the same corpse. His lawyer, Daniel Conway, said Sunday that Holmes was ordered "to be in the photo, so he got in the photo. That doesn't make him a murderer."

The photo was taken while the platoon leader, Lt. Roman Ligsay, was present, Conway said. Ligsay has asserted his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination in refusing to testify in the legal proceedings against his troops.
Conway sought copies of the photographs so that he could present them to a ballistics expert, who he argued might be able to tell whether the victim had been struck by the weapon Holmes was carrying. His request was rejected.

"I'm very disappointed that in an American judicial proceeding, I have to get potentially exculpatory evidence from a German newspaper," Conway said.
A third photo depicts two apparently dead men propped against a small pillar. Der Spiegel said the photo was seized from a member of the platoon, but did not involve the deaths being investigated as war crimes. Soldiers have told investigators that such photos of dead bodies were passed around like trading cards on thumb drives and other digital storage devices.

The killings at issue occurred during patrols in January, February and May 2010. After the first death, one member of the platoon, Spc. Adam Winfield, sent Facebook messages to his parents, telling them his colleagues had slaughtered one civilian, were planning to kill more and warned him to keep quiet about it.
His father notified a staff sergeant at Lewis-McChord, but no action was taken until May, when a witness in a drug investigation in the unit separately reported the deaths. Winfield is accused of participating in the final killing.

Morlock has given extensive statements claiming the murder plot was led by Staff Sgt. Calvin Gibbs of Billings, Mont.; Gibbs maintains the killings were legitimate.
Morlock told investigators he threw a grenade and Holmes shot Mudin without cause; Holmes says that he fired when Morlock told him to, believing that Morlock had perceived a legitimate threat.

Morlock's court martial was scheduled for Wednesday. He has agreed to plead guilty to murder, conspiracy and other charges and to testify against his co-defendants in exchange for a maximum sentence of 24 years in prison.
Meanwhile, military judge Lt. Col. Kwasi Hawks ruled late last week that Winfield can present evidence at his court martial that he tried to blow the whistle on the violence.

Prosecutors had tried to bar evidence that he sent the messages to his family.
Winfield has given a videotaped statement saying he took part in the final killing because he was afraid other soldiers might kill him if he didn't.
However, the judge sided with prosecutors on whether to suppress Winfield's videotaped statement as coerced.
In addition to the five soldiers charged in the deaths, seven soldiers in the platoon were charged with lesser crimes, including assaulting the witness in the drug investigation, drug use, firing on unarmed farmers and stabbing a corpse.
---
Associated Press writers Richard Lardner in Washington, D.C., and Kirsten Grieshaber and Tomislav Skaro in Berlin contributed to this report.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2013051443_apusafghanprobephotographs1stldwritethru.html?syndication=rss
« Last Edit: March 24, 2011, 11:16:02 am by Wendy Baby »
My Dad is the most important person in my life. Everything of value I have learnt I learned from him. X

Offline Cochise

  • Not the man he used to be and is looking for a fresh start. Still cannot escape the fact that he's had an X-Factor Winner. Twice.
  • RAWK Remembers
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,740
  • DON'T BUY THE S*N
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #568 on: March 24, 2011, 11:32:06 am »
source

Reminds me of Nazis in WW2 movies. Evil sick bastards.
JFT96 - YNWA

Oliver Kay ‏@OliverKayTimes
Those who've campaigned for the truth on Hillsborough were once a suppressed minority. Now the minority are those left clinging to the lies.

Offline Wendy Baby

  • Permanently stuck in 1917.
  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 802
  • Everything is in constant movement and change
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #569 on: March 24, 2011, 11:36:07 am »
Saw this piece yesterday about a protest in support for Bradley Manning...

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Bradley-Manning-WikiLeaks-Protest-Virginia-Daniel-Ellsberg-Among-35-Arrested-Outside-Quantico-Base/Article/201103315956985?lpos=World_News_First_World_News_Article_Teaser_Region_4&lid=ARTICLE_15956985_Bradley_Manning_WikiLeaks_Protest_Virginia%3A_Daniel_Ellsberg_Among_35_Arrested_Outside_Quantico_Base

Didn't think much of it until I saw this video of the protesters...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LWdu_vaeI7c

Are the coppers acting slightly precious here, or is it just my interpretation? The protesters all look like coffin dodging peaceniks to me. What's with the physicality and arrests? 1st ammendment, and all that...

Great to see the children of the sixties aren't all sunning themselves in Florida. The defence of Julian Asange,  Wiki Leaks and the defence of Manning are being sanitised by the left in the USA and Britain. The single issue brigades are backing Asange's extradition on the grounds of women's rights. At the High Court hearing  only a handful of young people turned up to protest. They were unconnected to any of the major left organisations. Its not a personality contest that's the issue. its the right of people and organisations to expose the behaviour of so called democratic governments. You can hear clearly in the utube video a protester demanding the police abide by the constitution. The police acted within the rules set by the ruling elite in the USA, they locked some up abused others and halted the protest, they are their police acting on their unwritten laws.
« Last Edit: March 24, 2011, 01:05:03 pm by Wendy Baby »
My Dad is the most important person in my life. Everything of value I have learnt I learned from him. X

Offline Corkboy

  • Sworn enemy of Bottlegirl. The Boston Toilet Mangler. Grauniad of the Cidatel. Into kinky S&M with the Lash.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,404
  • Is it getting better?
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #570 on: March 24, 2011, 12:38:46 pm »
It's not a wikileaks story  it came from Der Speigal.I posted the original story and this in reply to a post from  Davas yesterday
Wendy, seriously, what the fuck?

This is a thread about the Wikileaks story, and I posted a news item about Der Spiegel doing a similar thing with Afghanistan operations. So you come in, call me a quisling (demonstrating you don't know the meaning of the word) and then start on about ground troops in Libya. Are you drunk?

Offline Wendy Baby

  • Permanently stuck in 1917.
  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 802
  • Everything is in constant movement and change
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #571 on: March 24, 2011, 01:00:19 pm »


I Get told off for not having the right ribbon in my hair :P, about time I told someone else off  :-*
My Dad is the most important person in my life. Everything of value I have learnt I learned from him. X

Offline Wendy Baby

  • Permanently stuck in 1917.
  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 802
  • Everything is in constant movement and change
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #572 on: March 24, 2011, 01:06:07 pm »


Quisling where did I call you that?
My Dad is the most important person in my life. Everything of value I have learnt I learned from him. X

Offline Wendy Baby

  • Permanently stuck in 1917.
  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 802
  • Everything is in constant movement and change
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #573 on: March 24, 2011, 01:07:46 pm »
My Dad is the most important person in my life. Everything of value I have learnt I learned from him. X

Offline Wendy Baby

  • Permanently stuck in 1917.
  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 802
  • Everything is in constant movement and change
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #574 on: March 24, 2011, 01:20:31 pm »
it is easy to sit in an air-conditioned room and point fingers to a couple of soldiers who sees blood, dead bodies, war injuries everyday...and expect them to react like everybody else in those circumstances

You have a valid point  A Long time ago armies lined up in a field faced each other and won the battle by killing more than the other side. That's insane enough but at least it had some honour in battle crap attached to it. Today its about an occupying force suppressing the population who are dehumanised in the eyes of the soldier. They are taught to kill other human beings in as many different ways as possible, is it any wonder they become deranged.
My Dad is the most important person in my life. Everything of value I have learnt I learned from him. X

Offline BIGdavalad

  • Major Malfunction. Yearns To Be A Crab! MOD Agony Aunt. Dulldream Believer. Is the proud owner of a one year old login time.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 28,024
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #575 on: March 24, 2011, 01:21:39 pm »
Have you ever served in the Armed Forces Wendy?
Joining Betfair? Use the referral code UHHFL6VHG and we'll both get some extra cash.

All of the above came from my head unless otherwise stated. If you have been affected by the issues raised by my post, please feel free to contact us on 0800 1234567 and we will send you an information pack on manning the fuck up.

Offline Corkboy

  • Sworn enemy of Bottlegirl. The Boston Toilet Mangler. Grauniad of the Cidatel. Into kinky S&M with the Lash.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,404
  • Is it getting better?
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #576 on: March 24, 2011, 02:09:18 pm »
Quisling where did I call you that?
Wonder what the people of Libya will think when this reaches them? And before quisling Corkyboy asks yes I do think foot soldiers will go into Libya they will have to. Specialist forces to train the rebels at first but like all wars of this kind it won't be enough. The test is when the first made in US boot touches sand what the reaction from the rebels themselves will be

Offline Corkboy

  • Sworn enemy of Bottlegirl. The Boston Toilet Mangler. Grauniad of the Cidatel. Into kinky S&M with the Lash.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,404
  • Is it getting better?
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #577 on: March 24, 2011, 02:44:54 pm »
Have you ever served in the Armed Forces Wendy?

Ever put your life in another man's hands, ask him to put his life in yours?

We follow orders, son. We follow orders or people die. It's that simple. Are we clear?

Offline BIGdavalad

  • Major Malfunction. Yearns To Be A Crab! MOD Agony Aunt. Dulldream Believer. Is the proud owner of a one year old login time.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 28,024
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #578 on: March 24, 2011, 02:47:49 pm »
;D
Joining Betfair? Use the referral code UHHFL6VHG and we'll both get some extra cash.

All of the above came from my head unless otherwise stated. If you have been affected by the issues raised by my post, please feel free to contact us on 0800 1234567 and we will send you an information pack on manning the fuck up.

Offline El Campeador

  • Capital of Culture's Campaign Manager...Transfer Board Veteran 5 Stars.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 20,721
  • The shupporters create chances, for sure, djes
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #579 on: March 24, 2011, 03:00:09 pm »
You have a valid point  A Long time ago armies lined up in a field faced each other and won the battle by killing more than the other side. That's insane enough but at least it had some honour in battle crap attached to it. Today its about an occupying force suppressing the population who are dehumanised in the eyes of the soldier. They are taught to kill other human beings in as many different ways as possible, is it any wonder they become deranged.


Offline kopindian

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,951
    • Films I Watch
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #580 on: April 13, 2011, 05:40:08 am »
Wikileaks  have been coordinating with the National Newspaper The Hindu to publish the cables concerning India over the last month. Here is an interview with Julian Assange by the newspaper for those who are interested:

http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/article1688846.ece Part 1
http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/article1691777.ece Part 2

« Last Edit: April 13, 2011, 05:45:51 am by kopindian »

Offline Manav

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,944
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #581 on: June 16, 2011, 01:34:10 pm »
Wikileaks released a video on Assange's house arrest today if anyone's interested:
http://vimeo.com/25113282

Offline xavidub

  • Not on message, ennui
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 16,355
  • SOS Member No. 6218
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #582 on: June 16, 2011, 01:38:21 pm »
I definitely think that war criminals should be executed, not for their crimes, but for being lame-brained enough to make videos, take photographs etc of their misdeeds.
You have to try very hard to see what's going on in front of your face

Offline Corkboy

  • Sworn enemy of Bottlegirl. The Boston Toilet Mangler. Grauniad of the Cidatel. Into kinky S&M with the Lash.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,404
  • Is it getting better?
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #583 on: June 16, 2011, 02:49:00 pm »
Wikileaks released a video on Assange's house arrest today if anyone's interested:
http://vimeo.com/25113282

Astonishing. Under house arrest and electronic supervision for six months and counting and he has yet to be charged with anything. Britain or Burma?

Offline RedRabbit

  • Rampant but without the batteries.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,045
  • این نیز بگذرد
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #584 on: June 16, 2011, 11:23:13 pm »
Astonishing. Under house arrest and electronic supervision for six months and counting and he has yet to be charged with anything. Britain or Burma?

Airstrip One.

Offline socrates the sophist

  • No new LFC topics
  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 805
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #585 on: June 21, 2011, 03:05:15 pm »
I'm going to try and defend the kill team here...
Again, the whole thing of people being "sick, twisted, evil" tries IMO to personify the acts rather than considering that it also might be a by-product of the under-lying colonial agenda of the war on terrorism. (Armies come in to undeveloped nations to spread democracy. Yet some of the troops are killing, burning, raping the natives. Are they sick effers or may be they, subconsciously, understood that they are not here to serve the publicised agenda?)
I'm not necessarily saying that the second case is the actual scenario as I only have some proof (The Wikileaks BP document on Iraqi oil) of that. I'm just asking that we consider (what some might consider small?) possibility that it is the second option. Because in condemning the troops we are letting the ideas, strategies, administrations off the hook.
I mean surely troops are examined before registering for the Army, so they are saying they just turned mad? or that they were inherently evil? we suddenly have creationist-like philosophy?
There aren't many differences in these acts than what was done to native Americans for example (except in the numbers may be, although we can doubt that as well). In there isn't much difference in spreading democracy and the white man's burden.
So lets not blame troops or Rumsfield, its not their fault mainly.   

Offline Naughtykid

  • Ignore everyone else, listen to me. I SAID LISTEN TO ME!!! Oi! Where are you all going?
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,109
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #586 on: June 21, 2011, 03:14:31 pm »
I have an issue with one part of the story.

The bit were it talks about a soldier keeping a skull as a souvenir. That has to be complete bullshit. Surely it would be a fucking head.

Offline Corkboy

  • Sworn enemy of Bottlegirl. The Boston Toilet Mangler. Grauniad of the Cidatel. Into kinky S&M with the Lash.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,404
  • Is it getting better?
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #587 on: July 13, 2011, 08:20:53 pm »
Judgement reserved in the appeal against Assange's extradition, not expected for three weeks.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/blog/2011/jul/13/julian-assange-extradition-appeal-hearing-day-two-live-coverage

Offline jerseyhoya

  • Would love to get some of that Cock money
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,275
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #588 on: September 4, 2011, 07:23:09 am »

Offline The Gulleysucker

  • RAWK's very own spinached up Popeye. Transfer Board Veteran 5 Stars.
  • RAWK Remembers
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 11,496
  • An Indolent Sybarite
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #589 on: September 4, 2011, 07:33:42 am »
I have an issue with one part of the story.

The bit were it talks about a soldier keeping a skull as a souvenir. That has to be complete bullshit. Surely it would be a fucking head.

Er, nope. Skull stewing....



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_mutilation_of_Japanese_war_dead
I don't do polite so fuck yoursalf with your stupid accusations...

Right you fuckwit I will show you why you are talking out of your fat arse...

Mutton Geoff (Obviously a real nice guy)

Offline Corkboy

  • Sworn enemy of Bottlegirl. The Boston Toilet Mangler. Grauniad of the Cidatel. Into kinky S&M with the Lash.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,404
  • Is it getting better?
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #590 on: September 4, 2011, 05:06:10 pm »
Leak at WikiLeaks - A Dispatch Disaster in Six Acts

For anyone who wasn't arsed reading that, this seems to be the crux...

Quote
A Wikileaks statement on Twitter blames the Guardian and Leigh for the fact that the cables are now freely available online. "We have already spoken to the (US) State Department and commenced pre-litigation action," it said, adding that their targets were the Guardian and a person in Germany who gave out the paper's password. Leigh breached a confidentiality agreement between Wikileaks and the Guardian, it added. The US Embassy in London and the US State Department had been notified of the possible publication already on August 25 so that officials could warn informants.

In a statement the Guardian rejected the accusations from Wikileaks, explaining that the paper had been told the password was temporary and would be deleted within hours. "No concerns were expressed when the book was published and if anyone at WikiLeaks had thought this compromised security they have had seven months to remove the files," the statement said. "That they didn't do so clearly shows the problem was not caused by the Guardian's book."

Offline PJG

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,079
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #591 on: October 27, 2011, 11:37:31 am »
Wikileaks faces collapse following payments freeze, Julian Assange warns

WIKILEAKS, whose spectacular publication of classified data shook world capitals and exposed the inner workings of international diplomacy, may be weeks away from collapse, the organisation's leader said.
Although its attention-grabbing leaks spread outrage and embarrassment across military and diplomatic circles, WikiLeaks' inability to overturn the block on donations imposed by American financial companies may prove its undoing.

"If WikiLeaks does not find a way to remove this blockade we will simply not be able to continue by the turn of the new year," founder Julian Assange said.

"If we don't knock down the blockade we simply will not be able to continue."

As an emergency measure, Assange said his group would cease what he called "publication operations" to focus its energy on fundraising. He added that WikiLeaks, which he said had about 20 employees, needs an additional $US3.5 million to keep it going into 2013.

 .WikiLeaks, launched as an online repository for confidential information, shot to notoriety with the April 2010 disclosure of footage of two Reuters journalists killed by a US military strike in Baghdad.

The Pentagon had claimed that the journalists were likely "intermixed among the insurgents", but the helicopter footage, which captured US airmen firing on prone figures and joking about "dead bastards", unsettled many across the world.

The video was just a foretaste. In the following months, WikiLeaks published nearly half a million secret military documents from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. As a whole the documents provided an unprecedented level of detail into the grueling, bloody conflicts.
Individually, many raised concerns about the actions of the US and its local allies - for example by detailing evidence of abuse, torture and worse by Iraqi security forces.

Although US officials railed against the disclosures, claiming that they were putting lives at risk, it wasn't until WikiLeaks began publishing a massive trove of 250,000 US State Department cables late last year that the financial screws began to tighten.

One after the other, MasterCard, Visa, Bank of America, Western Union and Ebay's PayPal stopped processing donations to WikiLeaks, starving the organization of cash as it was coming under intense political, financial and legal pressure.

Assange said Monday that the restrictions - imposed in early December - had cut off some 95 per cent of the money he believes his organization could have received.

WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson defended the estimate as "conservative", noting that in 2010 the average monthly donation to WikiLeaks had been more than 100,000 euros ($US140,000), while in 2011 the amount had fallen to between 6,000 and 7,000 euros.

Each company has given its own explanation for the blockade, expressing some level of concern over the nature of the secret-spilling site.

But WikiLeaks supporters often point out that MasterCard and Visa still process payments for fringe groups such as the American Ku Klux Klan or the far-right British National Party and that neither WikiLeaks nor any of its staff have been charged with any crime.

Assange said his group was being subjected to corporate censorship, a sentiment backed by Dave Winer, a visiting scholar at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute.

"This was done without due process, without any charges, and has been in place since December last year", he said in a blog post about the blockade.

"If I want to give $100 to WikiLeaks, and if I want to use my credit card to do so, who are they to say I can't?"

WikiLeaks has recently taken steps to work around the blockade, including a series of auctions and moves toward cell phone-enabled donations. Assange said Monday that his group was switching its focus from soliciting small-time donations, which typically net about $25, to getting money from a "constellation of wealthy individuals".

He didn't elaborate, but Assange has several wealthy backers, including Frontline Club founder Vaughan Smith, whose manor house in eastern England has been put at Assange's disposal while he fights extradition to Sweden on sex crime allegations.

A decision on whether to extradite him is expected in the next few weeks. Speaking to journalists after Monday's appearance, Assange put his chances of being extradited without the possibility of appeal at "30 percent".

Also looming in the background is a US grand jury investigation into WikiLeaks' disclosures. Earlier this month, a small California-based Internet provider became the second company to confirm it was fighting a court order demanding customer account information as part of the American WikiLeaks inquiry.

WikiLeaks' suspected source, US Army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning, remains in custody at Fort Leavenworth prison in Kansas.

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/australian-it/wikileaks-faces-collapse-following-donations-freeze-julian-assange-warns/story-e6frgakx-1226176821380

Offline Corkboy

  • Sworn enemy of Bottlegirl. The Boston Toilet Mangler. Grauniad of the Cidatel. Into kinky S&M with the Lash.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,404
  • Is it getting better?
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #592 on: November 2, 2011, 10:17:11 am »
Julian Assange loses appeal against extradition

High court judges rule the WikiLeaks founder should face accusations of rape in Sweden
     
    Robert Booth
    guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 2 November 2011 09.48 GMT

The WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, has lost his high court appeal against extradition to Sweden to face rape allegations.

Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Ouseley handed down their judgment in the 40-year-old Australian's appeal against a European arrest warrant issued by Swedish prosecutors after rape and sexual assault accusations made by two Swedish women following his visit to Stockholm in August 2010.

The decision means Assange could be removed to Sweden within 10 days, though it is more likely that the earliest time he would find himself on Swedish soil would be around 26 November.

Assange has 14 days to seek leave to appeal to the supreme court if he believes there is a wider issue of "public importance" at stake in the decision. If he is successful in persuading the high court of that, he is likely to remain on conditional bail until a hearing, which is unlikely to take place until next year.

If he is denied the right to appeal then British law enforcement officers will be responsible for arranging his removal to Sweden within 10 days.

The decision comes three and a half months after the end of an appeal hearing in July, when lawyers for Assange argued the arrest warrant was invalid because of significant discrepancies between its allegations of sexual assault and rape and the testimonies of the two women he allegedly had sex with.

Ben Emmerson QC, for Assange, had claimed the warrant "misstates the conduct and is, by that reason alone, an invalid warrant".

He recounted evidence of the encounter on the night of 13 August 2010 between Assange and a woman known as AA, who was hosting Assange at her apartment, during which AA said Assange tried to have sex with her without a condom.

Emmerson said there was no evidence of a lack of consent sufficient for the unlawful coercion allegation contained in the arrest warrant.

He argued the court had to decide only on whether the arrest warrant in connection with the events was valid on "strict and narrow" legal grounds.

Acting for the Swedish director of public prosecutions, Clare Montgomery QC said the charges detailed in the warrant were valid allegations and said AA, and another woman, known as SW, had described "circumstances in which they did not freely consent without coercion".

She said the definition of an extradition offence "means the conduct complained of. It has nothing to do with the evidence."

In February, when Assange challenged the extradition moves at Westminster magistrates court, his legal team warned their client could be at "real risk" of the death penalty of detention in Guantánamo Bay because they feared the US authorities would request his extradition from Sweden to face charges relating to WikiLeaks obtaining and publishing hundreds of thousands of classified US government documents.

The senior district judge threw out the appeal and ordered his extradition, and a week later Assange appealed to the high court.

He changed his legal team and adopted a less vocal strategy.

Assange has in effect been under house arrest at Ellingham Hall in Norfolk since December 2010. He has to sign in at a local police station every day, he wears an electronic tag that monitors his movements and he has to be back inside the house by 10pm each night.

Swedish prosecutors said Assange has been "detained in his absence on probable cause suspected of rape (less severe crime), sexual molestation and unlawful coercion."

source

Offline Mr Kipling

  • Manhattanite
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 8,846
  • "Dream of Kloppifornication"
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #593 on: November 2, 2011, 11:27:47 am »
Just flicked over to Sky News and the presenter said: "and there goes the great cheerleader of transparency in his vehicle with blacked out windows"

What an obnoxious bastard. He does work for Sky though.

Offline PJG

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,079
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #594 on: December 2, 2011, 08:47:21 am »
Assange: Using iPhone, gmail, Blackberry? You're screwed!

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange says that governments worldwide have been using electronic devices, such as smart-phones and computers, to monitor what people are saying, where they are going and what they are writing.

The controversial journalist spoke at a panel of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism held at the City University in London on Monday. The panel inaugurated Wikileak’s new project: the Spyfiles. They provide details on the deals private surveillance companies made with various governments all over the globe to design monitoring software integrated into electronic devices, which could be used to monitor the activities of whoever these governments want to keep track of.
“Who here has a BlackBerry? Who here uses Gmail? Well you are all screwed!” Assange exclaimed. “The reality is intelligence contractors are selling right to countries around the world mass surveillance systems for all of those products.”

The Wikileaks founder went on to say that these international surveillance companies, based mostly in “more technologically sophisticated countries,” often sold their technology to less advanced countries: states that have often been despised by the West for their allegedly authoritarian political regimes.
These include the Gaddafi regime in Libya, to which French company Amesys sold equipment designed to keep track of the then opposition members living abroad. Some of these dissidents are now part of the current ruling elite, but what raises eyebrows is that Gaddafi’s intelligence was able to pry on his opponents in the US, the UK and Finland.

Today we release over 287 files documenting the reality of the international mass surveillance industry – an industry which now sells equipment to dictators and democracies alike in order to intercept entire populations” Assange told reporters.

But software users in the West are not safe either. Assange and other members of the panel told reporters how western intelligence services used electronic devices to monitor the activities of its citizens. In Britain MI5 apparently used specialized voice recognition software implanted into cell phones that could make out who was speaking to whom. Other intelligence agencies had the ability to figure out where exactly the user was located, what they were typing and what they looked like. One of the programs allowed agencies to take photos of unsuspecting victims by using cameras implanted into their phones.
“The user’s physical location can be tracked if they are carrying a mobile phone, even if it is on standby” Assange said.

Wikileaks recently celebrated the first anniversary of the controversial publication of US diplomatic cable leaks – a publication that made Julian Assange a household name.

Assange is currently under house arrest in London, where he is planning to launch an appeal against the recent ruling of a British court, which decided to extradite the journalist to Sweden, where he is accused of sexually harassing two women. Assange fears that his extradition to Sweden may eventually end up being one to the United States and will be appealing the ruling once again next Monday.

http://rt.com/news/assange-london-panel-wikileaks-805/

Offline Corkboy

  • Sworn enemy of Bottlegirl. The Boston Toilet Mangler. Grauniad of the Cidatel. Into kinky S&M with the Lash.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,404
  • Is it getting better?
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #595 on: February 7, 2012, 04:28:20 pm »
Bradley Manning for Nobel Peace Prize?

Published: 06 February, 2012, 21:49

Bradley Manning, the US soldier accused of passing secret materials to Wikileaks, has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

­The nomination was proposed by The Movement of Icelandic Parliament, which asserts that revelations produced by the documents Manning allegedly exposed “have helped to fuel a worldwide discussion about America’s overseas engagements, civilian war casualties, imperialistic manipulations, and rules of engagement.”

RT spoke to one of the members of The Movement, MP Birgitta Jonsdottir.

She said the group “wanted to raise awareness about the situation with Private Bradley Manning, whom way too few people know of.”

“It is extremely important that we honor the whistleblowers of our world,” she said, so people will not be silenced from performing their civic duty “by reporting on crimes, be it corporate, state or military.”

Jonsdottir believes Manning has as much chance to win the prize as any other nominee.

But, Icelandic MP said, the decision on a Nobel Peace Prize is a very politicized matter, “because peace – just like war – is a very political issue.”

Manning was arrested in May 2010 on suspicion of having passed classified materials to WikiLeaks. After a pretrial hearing concluded last month, it was announced that the case would be tried in a military court.

Manning faces 22 charges of violating the military code, from theft of records to aiding the enemy.

If found guilty, he could face life in prison or execution. The soldier has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

­Clark Stoeckley, an artist who has dedicated much of his work to the Manning case, believes that “he will probably be one of the highest vote-getters for this Nobel Peace Prize,” and he hopes Manning wins.

Stoeckley also believes winning the prize will dramatically improve Manning’s situation, because “it will be hard to keep him in prison after winning prize like that.”

source

Offline Corkboy

  • Sworn enemy of Bottlegirl. The Boston Toilet Mangler. Grauniad of the Cidatel. Into kinky S&M with the Lash.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,404
  • Is it getting better?
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #596 on: March 12, 2012, 02:39:44 pm »
Bradley Manning's treatment was cruel and inhuman, UN torture chief rules

UN special rapporteur on torture's findings likely to reignite criticism of US government's treatment of WikiLeaks suspect

    Ed Pilkington in New York
    guardian.co.uk, Monday 12 March 2012 13.41 GMT

The UN special rapporteur on torture has formally accused the US government of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment towards Bradley Manning, the US soldier who was held in solitary confinement for almost a year on suspicion of being the WikiLeaks source.

Juan Mendez has completed a 14-month investigation into the treatment of Manning since the soldier's arrest at a US military base in May 2010. He concludes that the US military was at least culpable of cruel and inhumane treatment in keeping Manning locked up alone for 23 hours a day over an 11-month period in conditions that he also found might have constituted torture.

"The special rapporteur concludes that imposing seriously punitive conditions of detention on someone who has not been found guilty of any crime is a violation of his right to physical and psychological integrity as well as of his presumption of innocence," Mendez writes.

The findings of cruel and inhuman treatment are published as an addendum to the special rapporteur's report to the UN general assembly on the promotion and protection of human rights. They are likely to reignite criticism of the US government's harsh treatment of Manning ahead of his court martial later this year.

Manning, 24, was arrested on May 29 2010 at the Forward Operating Base Hammer outside Baghdad, where he was working as an intelligence analyst. Manning has been charged with 22 counts, including aiding the enemy, relating to the leaking a massive trove of state secrets to the whistleblowing website WikiLeaks.

Mendez, who runs the UN office that investigates incidents of alleged torture around the world, told the Guardian: "I conclude that the 11 months under conditions of solitary confinement (regardless of the name given to his regime by the prison authorities) constitutes at a minimum cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment in violation of article 16 of the convention against torture. If the effects in regards to pain and suffering inflicted on Manning were more severe, they could constitute torture."

Manning was initially held for almost three months at Camp Arifjan in Kuwait, and then transferred in July 2010 to the Marine corps base at Quantico in Virginia. He was held there for another eight months in conditions that aroused widespread condemnation, including being held in solitary confinement for 23 hours a day and being made to strip naked at night.

In his opening letter to the US government on December 30 2010, Mendez said that the prolonged period of isolated confinment was believed to have been imposed "in an effort to coerce him into 'cooperation' with the authorities, allegedly for the purpose of persuading him to implicate others."

It is known that the US department of justice is conducting a grand jury in Virginia exploring the possibility of bringing charges against Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder.

The US mission to the UN in Geneva responded to Mendez on January 27 2011. It said that the US government "is committed to protecting human rights in our country and abroad, and we value the work of the special rapporteur".

In a later letter, dated May 19 2011, the Pentagon's legal counsel told Mendez that it was satisfied that Manning's treatment at Quantico had been fine. "Though Private Manning was classified as a maximum custody detainee at Quantico, he occupied the very same type of single-occupancy cell that all other pretrial detainees occupied."

But the Pentagon's arguments did not impress the special rapporteur. He stressed in his final conclusions that "solitary confinement is a harsh measure which may cause serious psychological and physiological adverse effects on individuals regardless of their specific conditions." Moreover, "[d]epending on the specific reason for its application, conditions, length, effects and other circumstances, solitary confinement can amount to a breach of article seven of the international covenant on civil and political rights, and to an act defined in article one or article 16 of the convention against torture."

He also said that the US government had tried to justify Manning's solitary confinement by calling it "prevention of harm watch". Yet the military had offered no details as to what actual harm was being prevented.

Mendez told the Guardian that he could not reach a definitive conclusion on whether Manning had been tortured because he has consistently been denied permission by the US military to interview the prisoner under acceptable circumstances.

The Pentagon has refused to allow Mendez to see Manning in private, insisting that all conversations must be monitored. "You should have no expectation of privacy in your communications with Private Manning," the Pentagon wrote.

The lack of privacy is a violation of human rights procedures, the UN says, and considered unacceptable by the UN special rapporteur.

Manning's travails in solitary confinement came to an end on April 20 2011 when he was transferred from Quantico to Fort Leavenworth in Kansas, where he was held in more open conditions. He is currently being held in a facility in Virginia so that he can make frequent pre-trial appearances at Fort Meade in Maryland ahead of his eventual court martial.

source

Offline CornerFlag

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,681
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #597 on: July 30, 2013, 11:35:12 pm »
"Manning cleared of 'aiding the enemy' but found guilty of five espionage charges"

Quote
Bradley Manning cleared of 'aiding the enemy' but guilty of most other charges
• Pfc. Manning convicted of multiple Espionage Act violations
• Acquitted of most serious 'aiding the enemy' charge
• Army private faces maximum jail sentence of 136 years

Bradley Manning has already spent 1,157 days in detention since his arrest in May 2010. Photograph: Alex Wong/Getty Images

Bradley Manning, the source of the massive WikiLeaks trove of secret disclosures, faces a possible maximum sentence of 136 years in military jail after he was convicted of most charges on which he stood trial.

Colonel Denise Lind, the military judge presiding over the court martial of the US soldier, delivered her verdict in curt and pointed language. "Guilty, guilty, guilty, guilty," she repeated over and over, as the reality of a prolonged prison sentence for Manning – on top of the three years he has already spent in detention – dawned.

The one ray of light in an otherwise bleak outcome for Manning was that he was found not guilty of the single most serious charge against him – that he knowingly "aided the enemy", in practice al-Qaida, by disclosing information to the WikiLeaks website that in turn made it accessible to all users including enemy groups.

Lind's decision to avoid setting a precedent by applying the swingeing "aiding the enemy" charge to an official leaker will invoke a sigh of relief from news organisations and civil liberties groups who had feared a guilty verdict would send a chill across public interest journalism.

The judge also found Manning not guilty of having leaked an encrypted copy of a video of a US air strike in the Farah province of Aghanistan in which many civilians died. Manning's defence team had argued vociferously that he was not the source of this video, though the soldier did admit to later disclosure of an unencrypted version of the video and related documents.

Lind also accepted Manning's version of several of the key dates in the WikiLeaks disclosures, and took some of the edge from other less serious charges. But the overriding toughness of the verdict remains: the soldier was found guilty in their entirety of 17 out of the 22 counts against him, and of an amended version of four others.

The guilty verdicts included seven out of the eight counts brought under the Espionage Act. On these counts, Manny was accused of leaking the Afghan and Iraq war logs, embassy cables and Guantánamo files "with reason to believe such information could be used to the injury of the US or the advantage of any foreign nation". The 1917 act has previously been reserved largely for those who engage in spying as opposed to leaking; the seven convictions under the act are likely to be seen as a major stepping up of the US government's harsh crackdown on whistleblowing.

Manning was also found guilty of "wrongfully and wantonly" causing to be published on the internet intelligence belonging to the US, "having knowledge that intelligence published on the internet is accesible to the enemy". That guilty ruling could still have widest ramifications for news organisations working on investigations relating to US national security.

The verdict was condemned by human rights campaigners. Amnesty International's senior director of international law and policy, Widney Brown, said: "The government's priorities are upside down. The US government has refused to investigate credible allegations of torture and other crimes under international law despite overwhelming evidence.

"Yet they decided to prosecute Manning who it seems was trying to do the right thing – reveal credible evidence of unlawful behaviour by the government. You investigate and prosecute those who destroy the credibility of the government by engaging in acts such as torture which are prohibited under the US Constitution and in international law."

Ben Wizner, of the American Civil LIberties Union, said: "While we're relieved that Mr Manning was acquitted of the most dangerous charge, the ACLU has long held the view that leaks to the press in the public interest should not be prosecuted under the Espionage Act.

"Since he already pleaded guilty to charges of leaking information – which carry significant punishment – it seems clear that the government was seeking to intimidate anyone who might consider revealing valuable information in the future."

In a statement to the Guardian, Manning's family expressed "deep thanks" to his civilian lawyer, David Coombs, who has worked on the case for three years. They added: "While we are obviously disappointed in today's verdicts, we are happy that Judge Lind agreed with us that Brad never intended to help America's enemies in any way. Brad loves his country and was proud to wear its uniform."

Once the counts are added up, the prospects for the Manning are bleak. Barring reduction of sentence for mitigation, which becomes the subject of another mini-trial dedicated to sentencing that starts tomorrow, Manning will face a substantial chunk of his adult life in military custody.

He has already spent 1,157 days in detention since his arrest in May 2010 – most recently in Fort Leavenworth in Kansas – which will be deducted from his eventual sentence.

A further 112 days will be taken off the sentence as part of a pre-trial ruling in which Lind compensated him for the excessively harsh treatment he endured at the Quantico marine base in Virginia between July 2010 and April 2011. He was kept on suicide watch for long stretches despite expert opinion from military psychiatrists who deemed him to be at low risk of self-harm, and at one point was forced to strip naked at night in conditions that the UN denounced as a form of torture.

Lind has indicated that she will go straight into the sentencing phase of the trial, in which both defence and prosecution lawyers will call new witnesses. This is being seen as the critical stage of the trial for Manning's defence: the soldier admitted months ago to being the source of the WikiLeaks disclosures, and much of the defence strategy has been focused on attempting to reduce his sentence through mitigation.

With that in mind, the soldier's main counsel, David Coombs, is likely to present evidence during the sentencing phase that Manning was in a fragile emotional state at the time he began leaking and was struggling with issues over his sexuality. In pre-trial hearings, the defence has argued that despite his at times erratic behaviour, the accused was offered very little support or counselling from his superiors at Forward Operating Base Hammer outside Baghdad.

The outcome will now be pored over by government agencies, lawyers, journalists and civil liberties groups for its implications for whistleblowing, investigative reporting and the guarding of state secrets in the digital age. By passing to WikiLeaks more than 700,000 documents, Manning became the first mass digital leaker in history, opening a whole new chapter in the age-old tug-of-war between government secrecy and the public's right to information in a democracy.

Among those who will also be closely analysing the verdict are Edward Snowden, the former NSA contractor who has disclosed the existence of secret government dragnets of the phone records of millions of Americans, who has indicated that the treatment of Manning was one reason for his decision to seek asylum in another country rather than face similar aggressive prosecution in America. The British government will also be dissecting the courtroom results after the Guardian disclosed that Manning is a joint British American citizen.

Another party that will be intimately engaged with the verdict is WikiLeaks, and its founder, Julian Assange. They have been the subject of a secret grand jury investigation in Virginia that has been looking into whether to prosecute them for their role in the Manning disclosures.

WikiLeaks and Assange were mentioned repeatedly during the trial by the US government which tried to prove that the anti-secrecy organisation had directly steered Manning in his leaking activities, an allegation strongly denied by the accused. Prosecutors drew heavily on still classified web conversations between Manning and an individual going by the name of "Press Association", whom the government alleges was Assange.
My Twitter

Last time I went there I saw masturbating chimpanzees. Whether you think that's worthy of Ł22 is up to you. All I'll say is I now have an annual pass.

Offline Nazi Dickhead

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,270
  • Man moth?
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #598 on: July 31, 2013, 10:08:18 am »
How can we just sit by and watch this man be locked away for exposing the crimes and atrocities committed by the U.S Government?

A crazy crazy time we live in.
-YNWA-

Offline Pinky_Bieber

  • shit fan whose IQ is unlikely to be exceeding 59
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,492
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Wikileaks:
« Reply #599 on: July 31, 2013, 05:37:16 pm »
How can we just sit by and watch this man be locked away for exposing the crimes and atrocities committed by the U.S Government?

A crazy crazy time we live in.

exposing the crimes to who exactly?  you think people didnt know what is going on?

there is injustice everywhere,and for me no crime is bigger than the other...russians with chechens and other muslim countries that are under russian territory, turks with kurds,israelis with palestinians,china with tibet,spain with basque etc

its crazy world, and pointing the finger towards USA all the time is silly

i'm against of any crime and everyone should clean up his own backyard first before he starts making judgments and jumps on that ship "lets blame America for everything"
YNWA