I dont think you're in any position to say that given the absolute bile you've written about Kenny Dalglish on here.
Can you elaborate please? You seem to think that saying so is enough.
What "absolute bile" have I written about Kenny Dalglish on here?
Is it or is it not the case that Kenny Dalglish chose to deploy Downing repeatedly over Maxi Rodriguez? Is it or is it not factually correct that he introduced Downing as a substitute shortly after and/or shortly before taking Andy Carroll out of the game?
Is it or is it not factually correct that Kenny Dalglish at the very least did not veto paying 35 million quid for an injured Andy Carroll?
In any case, Kenny Dalglish is so (
rightly) firmly ensconced
as a Liverpool FC legend, as a player and manager, that neither what
you claim is "the absolute bile" that I have written about him on here, nor your over-the-top defense of him matter one iota.
Finally, even if what you had said was accurate, which it is not, the statements that excuses and explanations differ in kind, and that dismissing the latter by calling them the former is a bit lame, would (and actually are) still be true.