Where do you guys watch him from? What vantage point?
Don't start quoting statistics as proof of payment players quality cus the only stats that matter are goals scored or clean sheets for a keeper.
Watford his awful defending set the tone. New keeper in goal. The instruction had to be keep it tight ten mins don't concede anything in our half. Watch t game his gaff was the catalyst for the game falling apart.
Spurs game h ducked a ball going nowhere that resulted in a goal goal the Loss of three points. It's small crucial things like this that make the difference at the top level.
His positioning is crap and he can't read the game.
Fifty games in a season. H many has Mignolet played? Is this this measure of his quality as well??
The two 'mistakes' you are using are just silly. I only used those stats to prove that what you said was nonsense, as I too think stats are used too much. But they can prove some statements to be untrue.
And lets say these two mistakes are real. That's two mistakes in over 50 games, so yes, the amount of games is a good measure of his quality. The fact that those are the only two mistakes that immediately come into your head show just how good he is. They're not even genuine, clear cut mistakes yet they are your biggest and only example of him being a poor defender.
Everybody has an opinion and it is great when people have contrasting opinions, but in this case there is absolutely no doubt that Nathaniel Clyne has been our best, most consistent player over a huge period of games. Again, the amount of games is vital to show just how good he is.
Just out of interest and because I could do with a laugh, who would you suggest we replace him with?
