Honestly it's pointless arguing with you about this. You just ignore all the actual arguments made, and only want to talk about how people feel regardless of the facts.
This is politics though, it’s *about* how people feel. You aren’t going to persuade anyone unless you can change how they feel, and I think you’re fundamentally mistaken about how - or to be honest even whether - that’s possible. The fundamental bottom line imo, if I really wanted to nail it down, is that people don’t actually believe there’s any such thing as transgender. They will go along with the idea to the extent that it helps people deal with their anguish - but push it beyond that into demedicalising it, blocking puberty, surgery for teens, access to prisons, allowing men into women’s sports, etc. and I do not think the public will ever accompany you there. Anything that harms others or even infringes on others is just not going to be acceptable. Some might acquiesce to a pronoun but even that is pushing it. End of the day people have very limited scope for accepting things that aren’t true.
I’m sorry but I think your good intentions on this issue are misguided and I do not think the public will ever believe that your progressive policies are the right way to tackle the issue. I do not think it is one you can win.
And lastly, minor point, but since you’re picking me up on this I actually said the opposite:
And you're point about talking about things being rare - you are the one who has just said that women never rape women.
It’s possible eg as a joint enterprise, but rare