Just to be VERY clear, writing a lot of things doesn't equal detail. Just as an example "helping people with kids" - the last Labour administration's actions led to us having the highest childcare costs in Europe. Tax credits sound great but without adding any restrictions on what childcare providers could charge they basically just increased profits for childcare providers whilst not really helping those with kids. That's the kind of thing you're passing off as detail. But the point is, this is not the Labour thread, you have made it such. I tried to bring it back and you turned it back to the Labour thread, nothing to do with me ignoring your "detailed" answers.
This is a thread about industrial action. Labour aren't supporting the strikes, telling people they can't show support on pickets. They are saying they won't find the money for pay restoration.
That's the only context in which Labour should be being discussed in this thread. And none of it changes my vote because I couldn't vote Labour here even if I wanted to BECAUSE the main parties don't believe in democracy and like the rigged system that splits power between them and them alone. So you'll forgive me if I don't hop over to the Labour thread for a chat about the folks who won't even leave me in a position to possibly vote for them and who don't even leaflet here.
Read my posts again. I actually went into detail supporting the NHS strikes and how the Torys fobbed off NHS workers for years, how Labour values NHS workers and the NHS. it was about actually caring. trying to create a decent society, those points are all relevant to the strikes, the only reason we moved on was when you brought up Blair and now your trying to claim I derailed the thread. lets say we both went off topic. you took it off topic, I answered the points you were making so we both went off topic.
Read my reply's to your early posts, I answered the points you made you ignored my reply's, your now making some argument about detail doesn't mean I answered the point.
I didn't think I needed to go into detail when talking about helping people with kids, nobody has to do that on this site, Labour supporters know this already, it's all been covered countless times. so Labour bring higher benefits and tax credits to help parents, sure start and you chose to focus on some stat that may or not be true to attack them.
I also didn't go into detail on taking millions of kids out of poverty, education etc either, same with the elderly and vulnerable. that's detail and shows some of the things you look for when deciding if someone is on the left and right so maybe you missed my point, all that detail was about how you judge if a party is left or right wing, it always gets ignored as people chose to focus on something abstract to claim they are right wing or Torys.
I don't need to hear someone tell me if it's left or right wing, I know what right wing policys are, the right will never bring in policys like the policys Labour brought in when in power.
It seems people think being left wing means you must oppose everything the Torys say or do.
You ignored the points I made in my replys and came out with other points, loads of different points and then accuse me of not answering all your points to claim I wasn't arguing in good faith.
I will leave it at that.