Author Topic: Suarez banned for 4 months (discuss ban not transfer rubbish) (Read 243420 times)

Zoomers · « **Reply #120 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:02:59 pm »

Fucking hell... At least it means he's staying? But he does miss a fuckload of games...

AB LFC · « **Reply #121 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:05 pm »

He's a brilliant footballer but an absolute fucking idiot. Deserved. Remember it's his third strike aswell. He should be glad he didn't a huge fine,

RoverAndOut · « **Reply #122 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:09 pm »

Where are all the know-it-alls who "debunked" the idea that Suarez could get a global ban then?

An appeal is not usually a risk-free process so Luis may be best advised to take this on the chin and, I don't know, stop biting people?

deano2727 · « **Reply #123 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:13 pm »

Got to say, I feel he deserves a higher punishment, personally. What I dont agree with is us getting punished along with him. Fuck off FIFA.

El Lobo · « **Reply #124 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:16 pm »

To be brutally honest I don't think it'll affect us on the pitch, as I don't think he'll be here.

Snail · « **Reply #125 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:21 pm »

Thanks for updating us, Wimbledon.

Farcical.

Stussy · « **Reply #126 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:23 pm »

Jesus wept

peachybum · « **Reply #127 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:24 pm »

Got no problem with FIFA's decision. This isn't on them it's on Suarez. Biting for the third time is fucking crazy and banning him from football completely was justified. Of course it punishes us but what else could they do. Sadly our season is now a bit fucked but we knew what Suarez was like and we continued to back him and give him new contracts.

Elzar · « **Reply #128 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:25 pm »

Does administrive ban mean we can't register him for the Champions League??

Tom_B · « **Reply #129 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:38 pm »

So we are supposed to pay £200k a week to a player we can't use because of something he did when he wasn't even playing for us?

Surely an appeal, as I would think there are legal issues here.

Broad Spectrum · « **Reply #130 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:38 pm »

There's no way that'll last for club football.

CraigDS · « **Reply #131 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:47 pm »

Out of interest, if I was a player at the WC and dived two footed into a player a broke his leg, as has happened before, has there ever been a precedent of this getting a domestic ban too?

Clint Eastwood · « **Reply #132 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:49 pm »

Quote from: Noh on June 26, 2014, 03:02:20 pm

This occasion has to be dealt with the same way such as harsh tackling or punching whatever.
Luis has gotten unfair and double standard because he is luis suarez.

Nope, he's a tool.

IanMac · « **Reply #133 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:55 pm »

Quote from: Noh on June 26, 2014, 03:02:20 pm

This occasion has to be dealt with the same way such as harsh tackling or punching whatever.
Luis has gotten unfair and double standard because he is luis suarez.

No, it's because he's done it 3 times. 3 fucking times!! He's an idiot.

IgoDirk · « **Reply #134 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:57 pm »

9 League games.

So that's one less than Pepe, who assualted a player on the floor, raking his boots down his back.
More than Ben Thatcher, who elbowed Mendes, hospitalising him.

And whilst not even reperesnting Liverpool. Why should we be punished?

9 League games, why not just give him a lengthier international ban?

redk84 · « **Reply #135 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:03:59 pm »

just a bizarre incident all round.

And we end up the losers overall....

cheers Luis. nutjob.

Redman0151 · « **Reply #136 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:02 pm »

Quote from: Noh on June 26, 2014, 03:02:20 pm

This occasion has to be dealt with the same way such as harsh tackling or punching whatever.
Luis has gotten unfair and double standard because he is luis suarez.

No he's fucking bitten another person for the third time, there's no "poor Luis".

I know Suarez loves to make himself the victim in every situation, but it's ridiculous pushing this onto the media or anybody else.

XabiAlonsosBeard · « **Reply #137 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:11 pm »

I don't think we have a right of appeal. It appears only Suarez and the Uruguayan FA have a right of appeal.

Huge talent. But I think I've had enough now. It's pointless having a great talent if you can only utilise him for 2/3 of a season. I'd sell.

rappcats · « **Reply #138 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:11 pm »

9 for the national team, 12 for LFC - what a fucking joke of a sentence.

(but he still deserved some, but not at a such expense of the club)

Chakan · « **Reply #139 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:13 pm »

Quote from: Tom_B on June 26, 2014, 03:03:38 pm

So we are supposed to pay £200k a week to a player we can't use because of something he did when he wasn't even playing for us?

Surely an appeal, as I would think there are legal issues here.

No wages in that time.

Craig S · « **Reply #140 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:18 pm »

Quote from: suede lady on June 26, 2014, 02:59:41 pm

that is Southampton, Man City, Tottenham, Aston VIlla, West Ham, Everton, WBA, Queens Park Rangers and likely HUll that he will miss

Plus champions league and league cup

bahrainexpat · « **Reply #141 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:19 pm »

Fifa media relations manager Delia Fischer adds: "An appeal may be lodged by the player and/or Uruguay FA."

jamie_c · « **Reply #142 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:26 pm »

Very minor point, but given the incident happened on 24th i assume it's 4 months from then rather than todays date.

Means it would be 8 rather than 9 games for us and he'd be back for Hull

Giz a Gobble · « **Reply #143 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:35 pm »

Find it very difficult to have any degree of sympathy for him to be honest whilst he'll (I assume) be picking up his wages every week. Least he could do is donate a good chunk of it to local charities. My only concern is for LFC and how this impacts on us.

Stupid, stupid, stupid. We can moan about FIFA as much as we want, the reality is only one person has put us in this situation....

stevedo · « **Reply #144 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:37 pm »

Quote from: Ｓｉａｎ on June 26, 2014, 02:55:46 pm

Are they fucking serious?

Deadly. What a crock of crap.

DeLeiva · « **Reply #145 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:46 pm »

Silly, silly boy.

He has never completed a full season with us.... Such a daft thing to do.............. again.

Kadian · « **Reply #146 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:47 pm »

WHAT THE FUCK?!

SERIOUSLY WHAT THE FUCK

ronnnie yates · « **Reply #147 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:49 pm »

have to be honest , i thought it was going to be worse , ive been having a look at the foreign press , f uck me they want to hang him ,

suede lady · « **Reply #148 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:50 pm »

Quote from: momo22 on June 26, 2014, 03:01:05 pm

Plus champions league and league cup games.

yes but it makes no sense. either 9 games or 4 months, unless they don't count actually playing football as a football related activity

bill69 · « **Reply #149 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:04:55 pm »

Quote from: Chris~ on June 26, 2014, 03:02:57 pm

A quick look and assuming the ban starts today he misses 8 League games, 3 Champions League and a league cup game or two. Not sure if it's worth appealing. Say it takes a month to get the appeal heard, we could then be missing him deeper in to the season.

Unfortunately it won't be us that decides whether to appeal...

Oliver Kay ‏@OliverKayTimes · 3m
Fifa making up rules as they go along, but to judge by what they've just told me, only #URU (not #LFC) would be allowed to appeal Suarez ban

Upinsmoke · « **Reply #150 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:05:00 pm »

Quote from: IgoDirk on June 26, 2014, 03:03:57 pm

9 League games.

So that's one less than Pepe, who assualted a player on the floor, raking his boots down his back.
More than Ben Thatcher, who elbowed Mendes, hospitalising him.

And whilst not even reperesnting Liverpool. Why should we be punished?

9 League games, why not just give him a lengthier international ban?

Did Pepe do that three times? Use your brain mate.

CraigDS · « **Reply #151 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:05:07 pm »

Quote from: bahrainexpat on June 26, 2014, 03:04:19 pm

Fifa media relations manager Delia Fischer adds: "An appeal may be lodged by the player and/or Uruguay FA."

And what about his fucking club who you have no brought into this matter?

deano2727 · « **Reply #152 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:05:13 pm »

Quote from: bahrainexpat on June 26, 2014, 03:04:19 pm

Fifa media relations manager Delia Fischer adds: "An appeal may be lodged by the player and/or Uruguay FA."

No mention of his club...

Fuck that, take those c*nts to CAS.

Redman0151 · « **Reply #153 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:05:17 pm »

Quote from: suede lady on June 26, 2014, 03:04:50 pm

yes but it makes no sense. either 9 games or 4 months, unless they don't count actually playing football as a football related activity

9 international games + 4 months blanket ban from football

Agger · « **Reply #154 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:05:31 pm »

Joke.

Hazell · « **Reply #155 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:05:33 pm »

Quote from: Frisbee Nick on June 26, 2014, 02:55:57 pm

What were people expecting? They were always going to throw the book at him. It's bollocks that we have to suffer for what he did in a Uruguay shirt but it doesn't come as a shock.

We coped ok at the start of last season, we can do so again.

I was expecting an international ban of some sort but not an 'all football ban'. Surprising considering suspensions for other acts of violent conduct on the pitch in international matches are limited to international matches themselves. Seems more in keeping with trying to appease the masses.

Ah well, like you say, we can cope without him so yeah, it's a bit of a pain but not the end of the world.

Dave D · « **Reply #156 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:05:37 pm »

It's ok, the games he'll miss are against shite small time clubs anyway.

Danny mills must be gutted that Luis didn't get life in prison without release.

Harinder · « **Reply #157 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:05:48 pm »

This isn't a transfer forum topic. Don't even attempt to turn it into one. Discuss the ban which is fair and opine/whine away but please do not start opining on possible transfer deals.

It's just not cricket

Djimi Smicer34 · « **Reply #158 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:05:50 pm »

Quote from: Noh on June 26, 2014, 03:02:20 pm

This occasion has to be dealt with the same way such as harsh tackling or punching whatever.
Luis has gotten unfair and double standard because he is luis suarez.

No, he's gotten what he deserved because he bit someone for the third time.

Poor Liverpool, not poor Luis bloody Suarez.

Skeeve · « **Reply #159 on:** June 26, 2014, 03:05:50 pm »

Quote from: rob1408 on June 26, 2014, 02:56:19 pm

I'd sell him if there are any takers. On first glance the punishment seems harsh until you remember this is the third time. The lad gives his all for us, but we can't afford to have a player that misses a large chunk of games every season.

Serial legbreakers do not get banned from all football for subsequent offences though and they do far more damage to their opponents.

A lengthy international ban would be fair enough as a punishment for his actions, but punishing his club more than his country for what happened during an international is fucking ridiculous.