Author Topic: New Stadium Name (Read 18838 times)

WOOLTONIAN · « **on:** February 7, 2005, 12:11:21 pm »

I see Parry has opened his eyes to stadium sponsorship.
Personally if we can pull £100mil from a sponsor, I would be more than happy.

It's with this being considered that I would nominate we approach Stanley Bookmakers.
I cant see the natives being upset with the new place being named "Stanley Park"

Any better ideas ?

Paul Tomkins · « **Reply #1 on:** February 7, 2005, 12:13:06 pm »

Cusamano · « **Reply #2 on:** February 7, 2005, 12:14:12 pm »

I would settle for that.

Forbsie · « **Reply #3 on:** February 7, 2005, 12:14:45 pm »

Quote from: WOOLTONIAN on February 7, 2005, 12:11:21 pm

I see Parry has opened his eyes to stadium sponsorship.
Personally if we can pull £100mil from a sponsor, I would be more than happy.

It's with this being considered that I would nominate we approach Stanley Bookmakers.
I cant see the natives being upset with the new place being named "Stanley Park"

Wouldn't bet on it

WOOLTONIAN · « **Reply #4 on:** February 7, 2005, 12:15:16 pm »

Pure fuckin genius Paul innit

what's our chances of pulling that off ?
Is Parry as on the ball do yer think ?

Maggie May · « **Reply #5 on:** February 7, 2005, 12:27:40 pm »

Well I think we'd rarely do better than to invite London Rubber Company to be our sponsors. "Hot Rod" and "Inspirational" would do very well for player profiles, whilst "Beyond Seven" would be very attractive for a consecutive run of results.

Aaron The Red · « **Reply #6 on:** February 7, 2005, 09:15:23 pm »

I think it should still be called anfield lose the name lose the magic don't care how much money selling the naming rights generates some things are worth more than money OUR! stadium is one of those things.
We have never been sell outs and shouldn't start now leave that to the souless london clubs!!!

The Albert Cock · « **Reply #7 on:** February 8, 2005, 05:53:18 pm »

i think we all feel the same aaron, its not ideal mate.

what woudl you prefer souless or trophyless though?

Matt S · « **Reply #8 on:** February 8, 2005, 07:18:45 pm »

not arsed what its called. It wont be Anfield so whats the point in pretending it is. Theres no 'magic' there now anyway, accept on special occasions. And I'm sure the new bowl will be just as loud on those occasions.

Aaron The Red · « **Reply #9 on:** February 9, 2005, 01:45:51 pm »

Even if we get loads of money for the naming rights theres no guarantee the money will bring success. Obviously if the money was spent well and we won the title then yeah it'll have been a good idea but the way things have gone for the last 10 years or so I'd have to see it before i believe it.
However I do believe we have the right man for the job in Benitez and if he were to win the league next season i think we should name the stadium after him.(lol)
As long as there's a KOP in the new stadium I'll be happy enough!!

gates of shanks · « **Reply #10 on:** February 9, 2005, 02:16:58 pm »

I'd be more than happy with that

Roughie Scouse · « **Reply #11 on:** June 2, 2005, 11:00:57 am »

I heard it was going to be called Strawberry Fields!

Al Bol · « **Reply #12 on:** June 2, 2005, 10:47:54 pm »

Quote from: East Anglian Scouse on June 2, 2005, 11:00:57 am

I heard it was going to be called Strawberry Fields!

What, forever?

DonkeyWan · « **Reply #13 on:** June 3, 2005, 11:51:15 am »

Thes enames only last for 15 years though?

jward85 · « **Reply #14 on:** June 3, 2005, 12:41:42 pm »

Quote from: Dixon on February 8, 2005, 05:53:18 pm

i think we all feel the same aaron, its not ideal mate.

what woudl you prefer souless or trophyless though?

Dunno about most people, but personally I can geniunely say i'd prefer trophyless than soulless.

Onward Liverpudlian · « **Reply #15 on:** June 3, 2005, 03:17:41 pm »

As it's in Anfield and as it's on Anfield Road and as it's virtually merged as one with the old site (to become Anfield Plaza) then how about 'Anfield'.

robertma · « **Reply #16 on:** June 3, 2005, 03:53:50 pm »

So long as the name has a Liverpool connection i'd be happy

ds2190 · « **Reply #17 on:** June 4, 2005, 12:26:33 pm »

Name the stadium New Anfield and then do sponsorship for the stands...that way you can change every few years to get better deals

Arwen · « **Reply #18 on:** June 4, 2005, 07:59:49 pm »

I hope Parry won't sell name of stadium. For me it's more important than £100mil. I suggest merely Anfield Stadium.

The Bill Hicks Appreciation Society · « **Reply #19 on:** June 4, 2005, 08:05:57 pm »

I think Stanley Park is more than adequate

Arwen · « **Reply #20 on:** June 4, 2005, 08:26:40 pm »

This is Stanley

Why not Anfield?
from liverpoolfc.tv
"Is there a name for the new stadium?
Ricka Parry: The presumption is that it's going to be Anfield and there's been no suggestion that it will be called anything else."

The Bill Hicks Appreciation Society · « **Reply #21 on:** June 4, 2005, 08:48:23 pm »

Quote from: Arwen on June 4, 2005, 08:26:40 pm

This is Stanley Why not Anfield?
from liverpoolfc.tv
"Is there a name for the new stadium?
Ricka Parry: The presumption is that it's going to be Anfield and there's been no suggestion that it will be called anything else."

just think it's too sentimental. it won't be Anfield and new anfield sounds a bit pants, and it's going to be in Stanley Park, just makes sense is all.

Arwen · « **Reply #22 on:** June 4, 2005, 09:33:02 pm »

Is Anfield too sentimental? Stanley Park as name is without soul.

SMD · « **Reply #23 on:** June 4, 2005, 09:34:57 pm »

I don't mind either way, so long as it's not shit and has something to do with Liverpool.

I guess I prefer us to make new history rather than try and live off it.

The Bill Hicks Appreciation Society · « **Reply #24 on:** June 4, 2005, 09:42:20 pm »

Quote from: SMD on June 4, 2005, 09:34:57 pm

I guess I prefer us to make new history rather than try and live off it.

my sentiments exactly!

Ken-Obi · « **Reply #25 on:** June 5, 2005, 10:17:05 am »

Quote from: Arwen on June 4, 2005, 08:26:40 pm

This is Stanley

This got me thinking for quite a while.

Doesn't sound as good as 'This is Anfield' but Anfield was famous and intimidating because the crowd was mad, the noise was legendary, the supporters first class.

I can't see why 'This is Stanley' won't be good if the same atmosphere can be recreated or amplified at the new place.

Still... read it a few times, you get the picture. $:-\$

This is Anfield,
This is Stanley
This is Stanley
This is Stanley.

Hmm...

SMD · « **Reply #26 on:** June 5, 2005, 10:24:31 am »

"This is Stanley Park.

If you found Anfield intimidating, you might as well leave now."

The Bill Hicks Appreciation Society · « **Reply #27 on:** June 5, 2005, 10:26:40 am »

Quote from: SMD on June 5, 2005, 10:24:31 am

"This is Stanley Park.

If you found Anfield intimidating, you might as well leave now."

Sim6 · « **Reply #28 on:** June 8, 2005, 06:00:16 pm »

Carlsberg sponsoring us:
Probably the best stadium in the world

LpoolHope5* · « **Reply #29 on:** June 8, 2005, 09:56:19 pm »

The Benetiz Bowl

81a · « **Reply #30 on:** June 9, 2005, 12:44:34 am »

The 25th of May Stadium.

JPS · « **Reply #31 on:** June 9, 2005, 04:57:48 pm »

The Reebok Stadium? Oh, hang on...

Beef · « **Reply #32 on:** June 9, 2005, 08:48:10 pm »

I am not keen on the name Stanley Park. I want it to stay as Anfield!

LFC Lad · « **Reply #33 on:** June 9, 2005, 10:24:10 pm »

If Rick Parry wants to pull in sponsorship cash by using the new ground, he could sell the names of one or two of the stands to a sponsor. He shouln't sell the name of the ground. It should be called Anfield.

Jearm84 · « **Reply #34 on:** June 10, 2005, 11:38:28 pm »

Anfield or New Anfield to be honest

Arwen · « **Reply #35 on:** June 11, 2005, 06:27:56 pm »

Quote from: LFC Lad on June 9, 2005, 10:24:10 pm

It should be called Anfield.

I totally agree with your opinion. Anfield forever! So yes for Anfield Stadium.

xabialonso05 · « **Reply #36 on:** June 17, 2005, 08:23:33 pm »

Don't want a new stadium. FULL STOP

5-Time-Champions · « **Reply #37 on:** June 17, 2005, 09:02:47 pm »

I dont want to see a new stadium because there is nothing wrong with the present one I dont think and it would be good if they done some redevelopment on that and that way they can save millions and still have a perfectly good ground. As for this ground share shit, I think we are fine with a ground of our own, plus what colour would the ground be? Half red, half blue?

Shankly2005 · « **Reply #38 on:** June 17, 2005, 09:51:28 pm »

we dont need a new stadium, and the atmosphere wouldnt be the same

SMD · « **Reply #39 on:** June 17, 2005, 10:38:46 pm »

They can't feasibly redevelop any more, that's the whole point.