He’s been carrying our attack since Jan. He misses some easy chances but our season would’ve been over long ago if not for him.
Sorry, but I disagree. If you criticise Nunez, someone who scores a decent number of goals, whilst missing easy chances (and creating loads); but then on the other hand priase Diaz who doesn't score a decent number of goals, whilst missing easy chances (and creating not as much) - then how is that fair. Diaz, before today, in 25 full 90s, had 8 goals (from >10.6 xG, so underperforming his xG by 24.6% - and 4 assists (from 4.2 xA). Nunez, from 4 games fewer (21 full 90s), had 11 goals (from 14.2 nPxG, so underperforming by 22.% - LESS than Diaz has this season!), and 8 assists (from 5.6 xA). Nunez is 3 years younger lets not forget - Diaz is at an age where he should be at his prime, and not developing, whereas Nunez is only 24.
Just seems really unfair to criticise Nunez, who has underperforming his xG by *LESS* than Diaz, whilst creating more, and being 3 years younger as someone who many on here seem to want to get rid of; but then having people claim his been carrying our attack, and been brilliant, whilst underperforming Nunez on all metrics.