I don’t find it surprising that these things happen in the industry. What is kind of terrifying though, is that it was probably much, much worse in years gone by. There are so many stories that will never see the light of day.
As horrible as some of these stories are though, I do think we need to let the dust settle a little bit in some instances. I’m personally not keen on the rush to ruin somebody’s entire career and reputation within a few tweets. The accused need to be allowed at least a chance to respond before we all label them as guilty.
It's a fine line though isnt it? With the oddly tribal nature of wrestling, any response by the accused will be accepted by many instantly, and life will go on (except with the abused being blacklisted typically). Certain fans and bookers will protect any comment, so they remain protected
I think in the cases where there is clear evidence or multiple accounts, they shouldn't get a word in.
With the likes of Starr, Galagher, Coffey, Whiplash, Banks, there is either multiple accounts or evidence which can be seen. They should be deemed rotten, and in appropriate cases, face legal ramifications.
With those where it is a bit more contentious so to speak, investigations should be conducted, but I dont think the accused should have their say, because they hold power in this situation, they have an advantage. They could say anything and close down the accusations against them, even if they are true.
So, for example, I think it is right that WWE are looking into the allegations against him.
Out of all the names, the only one I hold any slightly different views about is Jimmy Havoc. I dont believe he should wrestle again, but unlike the others who seem to be abusing positions of power, Havoc MAY be mentally unwell (the accusation against him include heavy drinking and using threats of self harm and suicide to manipulate his GF. It is awful behaviour, unforgivable, but he himself may need psychiatric help and rehab. Again I may be naive but that may change how he is to women. It wont absolve him but it is better I guess)
