(Moving this to the Labour thread as it seems to fit better)
Some may say this now but history will be the judge. the vote of no confidence was justified, he never won their confidence or respect for a reason, he was useless from day 1, his attitude throughout the referendum campaign was the final straw, he refused to stand down, this was his decision alone and what followed was unnecessary but it only came about due to his refusal to accept realty.
I think history will vindicate the Labour MPs, they tried their best to avert the disaster they knew was about to come, the disaster they foresaw is now becoming a realty both for Labour and the country.
Sorry, I didn't mean to put that 'but' there, I think it was ill-judged because of its resulting failure. It didn't seem like they anticipated him not standing down at all, which obviously resulted in first the desperate attempts to try stop him re-standing, and then the humiliating challenge of Smith (nothing against Smith, very much a sacrificial lamb, obviously no-one was going to beat Corbyn). All of which just reinforced this shell around Corbyn.
I completely get why they did it, but hard left were never going to let go voluntarily, and that should've been foresaw really. I suppose they saw a little chance and felt they had to go for it but definitely ended up being a damaging failure.
Although I suppose once again it's something that Labour can point to post-Corbyn and say 'sorry, we tried'. Just I really do worry about the level of support Corbyn has and what that means going forward after this election.