Author Topic: Zonal Marking  (Read 17552 times)

Offline STORMTROOPER

  • RAWK Pedagogue.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,766
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #40 on: August 27, 2009, 11:27:39 am »
Its all about opinions. And if people think man for man is batter thats absolutely fine but it needs a good arguement for why we should change something that we are damn good at.
You're assuming that the delivery will be pretty much perfect for that scenaraio ?  and what happens if its not and the ball is 2 feet behind where its supposed to go ?   - 4 opposition players out of the game, we have kept our shape and are on the attack.
Plus, 4 players in the same space ?  Which means there will be no space. Which causes confusion.



surely it would be worth a chance to overcrowd one zone though with the precision of specialist corner takers.

even having 2 players in a defenders specific zone would be a nightmare for the defender.  one of the attackers stands bang next to our defender and blocks our defender from attacking the ball and the 2nd attacker comes into the zone with a running jump against a static, blocked off defender.

has anyone got the statistics for how many goals we have conceded from set pieces in comparison to other teams for last season and this season?

Offline rakey_lfc

  • pwned by Ronaldo...and eBay
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,004
  • I'm a people's man - only the people matter.”
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #41 on: August 27, 2009, 11:28:13 am »
Saturday team I play for uses this and we conceded one from a corner all season last year.

I know its not anything like the pros but point is. It works if you got the players willing to attack the ball every single time.
SUPPORT AND BELIEVE
 
You'll Never Walk Alone

Xbox 360 gamertag - TonyB1604

Offline slaphead

  • Nothing up top.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #42 on: August 27, 2009, 11:28:15 am »
I'd pay money to see a show with, say, Pleat, Hodgson and Taylor sat around with tea and biscuits and a chalkboard just discussing interesting tactical things that caught their eye over the weekend. In fact, Pleat and Taylor could be the main pundits, with, say, Chiles presenting it (because he doesn't know, because he is a fan and a good presenter, it means he asks good questions rather than having a smug opinion, a la Linekar) and a guest coach every week. Maybe today we have Sacchi talking about Liverpool's zonal marking and the finer points of Wigan's new possession style, next week Rijkaard as a guest discussing Arsenal's free flowing football and explaining how Real might go about constructing a tactic to fit there superstars etc etc etc

Great idea mate - I'd just love a proper tactics show of any sort. Players are so tedious compared to tactics, it boggles the mind how much time is spent on them rather than how the game is actually played.

Yeah
The constant references to how they used to play and annoying jibes at one another is bullox.
A good old show, not after any game or anything, just tactics and methods and such
Match Of The Day is still a must isnt it ?  But I hate how they scrutinise the SLIGHTEST decision or offiside. I know thats what they are paid to do but, still annoying.


Offline hesbighesred

  • Wallasey Wrecker. But you can call me quick fingers. After a threesome with Stevie and Alex
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 12,440
    • Collaborative thoughts on Euro 2012
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #43 on: August 27, 2009, 11:35:12 am »

surely it would be worth a chance to overcrowd one zone though with the precision of specialist corner takers.

even having 2 players in a defenders specific zone would be a nightmare for the defender.  one of the attackers stands bang next to our defender and blocks our defender from attacking the ball and the 2nd attacker comes into the zone with a running jump against a static, blocked off defender.

has anyone got the statistics for how many goals we have conceded from set pieces in comparison to other teams for last season and this season?
Again, isn't what you describe there actually FAR easier to do with man marking? One man takes their tallest defensive header to the near post. Torres lurks at the penalty spot, then accelerates to the near post. His 'marker' has zero chance of keeping up with him, the ball goes towards the near post, where we now have a 2 on 1 situation - 1 is impeding their tall header, Torres has the run on him and the chance of a free leap?
He is the cat who walks by himself, and all roads are alike to him.

Offline hesbighesred

  • Wallasey Wrecker. But you can call me quick fingers. After a threesome with Stevie and Alex
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 12,440
    • Collaborative thoughts on Euro 2012
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #44 on: August 27, 2009, 11:40:57 am »
Yeah
The constant references to how they used to play and annoying jibes at one another is bullox.
A good old show, not after any game or anything, just tactics and methods and such
Match Of The Day is still a must isnt it ?  But I hate how they scrutinise the SLIGHTEST decision or offiside. I know thats what they are paid to do but, still annoying.
It definitely still has it's moments but personally I wish MOTD would be replaced permanently by MOTD2. Better pundits, far better presenting, decent questions asked that encourage the pundits to say interesting things. MOTD, sadly, is completely formulaic and tedious. 3 weeks in and it's already 'So mark, do you think this puts team x in/out of the title race/4th spot race/avoiding relegation race,' and 'So what about that back four Alan, eh?' Followed by some smug and horrifically unfunny in-joke complete with knowing looks of pukeworthy cringeworthiness that has quite clearly just come from the latest Benidorm golf course they've all been topping up their 'orange' levels on...urrgh.

Like I say, it still has it's moments, almost all of them from Hansen, but I wish they'd just stick with the MOTD2 formula - which is also, actually, a LOT friendlier to casual fans and laymen, despite (or probably because) it has more analysis and the questions asked are more perceptive. My Girlfriend, for example, quite likes MOTD2 and will join in with chatting when that show is on. If it's MOTD she just falls asleep or does something else.
He is the cat who walks by himself, and all roads are alike to him.

Offline b_joseph

  • b_jesus, b_mary, b_joseph and the wee b_donkey. Unloyal gloryhunter who was probably Kelly Osbourne in another life.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 23,621
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #45 on: August 27, 2009, 11:41:09 am »
Again, isn't what you describe there actually FAR easier to do with man marking? One man takes their tallest defensive header to the near post. Torres lurks at the penalty spot, then accelerates to the near post. His 'marker' has zero chance of keeping up with him, the ball goes towards the near post, where we now have a 2 on 1 situation - 1 is impeding their tall header, Torres has the run on him and the chance of a free leap?
Communication though. You can always give out the instructions that you've moved on the responsibility of a player to someone else...the match up wont be great but atleast you'd still have a man on that player.

Couldnt that work?

Online Hazell

  • Ultimate Movie Night Draft Winner 2017. King - or Queen - of Mystery. Hyzenthlay. The 5th Benitle's sex conch.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 77,493
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #46 on: August 27, 2009, 11:44:38 am »
Give me man to man, so atleast each player can challenge their opposing player at all times.

Not true. If there's a crowd in the box, a player can run off of his man, leaving him with a free header if the ball comes to him. I know Torres and Kuyt have exploited this in the past.

Both systems have pros and cons, butand it's up the players to do their jobs
We have to change from doubter to believer. Now.

Offline slaphead

  • Nothing up top.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #47 on: August 27, 2009, 11:45:00 am »

has anyone got the statistics for how many goals we have conceded from set pieces in comparison to other teams for last season and this season?

I dont have it but I'll look
But I do know we allowed our opponents fewer attempts on target than any other team last season.

Offline b_joseph

  • b_jesus, b_mary, b_joseph and the wee b_donkey. Unloyal gloryhunter who was probably Kelly Osbourne in another life.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 23,621
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #48 on: August 27, 2009, 11:47:29 am »
Not true. If there's a crowd in the box, a player can run off of his man, leaving him with a free header if the ball comes to him. I know Torres and Kuyt have exploited this in the past.

Both systems have pros and cons, butand it's up the players to do their jobs

But like I said earlier. Dont crowd the box if you are the team on the defensive...it would look risky but you'd avoid the possibility of the attacker using another defender as a screen to free himself.


Agree with the bolded.

Offline slaphead

  • Nothing up top.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #49 on: August 27, 2009, 11:54:43 am »

has anyone got the statistics for how many goals we have conceded from set pieces in comparison to other teams for last season and this season?

Right - check this out. Its not last season but it is good.

http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Uk/uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool/2006-09/msg01335.html

This was 2005 season mind, but, here is a caption "The truth is that Liverpool conceded goals from only two corners last season, both coming in premiership games.  In total the Reds faced 137 corners in the league, meaning we conceded in 1.5% of them. Only Chelsea came close, conceding three from 127 corners (2.4%)

Thats some statistic there
Obvioulsy that will have been different last season but its very interesting

Online Hazell

  • Ultimate Movie Night Draft Winner 2017. King - or Queen - of Mystery. Hyzenthlay. The 5th Benitle's sex conch.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 77,493
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #50 on: August 27, 2009, 11:56:23 am »
But like I said earlier. Dont crowd the box if you are the team on the defensive...it would look risky but you'd avoid the possibility of the attacker using another defender as a screen to free himself.


Agree with the bolded.

But people are naturally risk averse, considering the amount of goals that are scored from corners, leaving your team open like that would increase the probability of the opposition scoring.

Besides which, it takes a bit of clever movement from the attacker, with him moving into an area that's already marked, then his teammate being able to screen his marker.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2009, 11:58:18 am by Hazell »
We have to change from doubter to believer. Now.

Offline hesbighesred

  • Wallasey Wrecker. But you can call me quick fingers. After a threesome with Stevie and Alex
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 12,440
    • Collaborative thoughts on Euro 2012
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #51 on: August 27, 2009, 11:56:46 am »
Communication though. You can always give out the instructions that you've moved on the responsibility of a player to someone else...the match up wont be great but atleast you'd still have a man on that player.

Couldnt that work?
I'm not sure what you mean there, or which system your referring to.

IF it's man to man, surely the whole point of the system is that you DON'T pass your man on? If you pass your man on, then someone else has to leave there man, so haven't you just effectively created two free men in the box?

But as I say I'm not sure what you meant, so if you could clarify ;)
He is the cat who walks by himself, and all roads are alike to him.

Offline Bandy

  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 971
  • Linux Based Fun.
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #52 on: August 27, 2009, 11:57:24 am »
Zonal marking is fine when everyone is fit and playing well.

If you remember some of the nightmare seasons where we did Man to Man marking and every corner of theirs led to a goal - then that's hardly a perfect system either. The problem is a lot of 'pundits' don't understand what they are attempting to talk about.
And it was all going so well

Offline STORMTROOPER

  • RAWK Pedagogue.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,766
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #53 on: August 27, 2009, 11:59:53 am »
Right - check this out. Its not last season but it is good.

http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Uk/uk.sport.football.clubs.liverpool/2006-09/msg01335.html

This was 2005 season mind, but, here is a caption "The truth is that Liverpool conceded goals from only two corners last season, both coming in Premier League games.  In total the Reds faced 137 corners in the league, meaning we conceded in 1.5% of them. Only Chelsea came close, conceding three from 127 corners (2.4%)

Thats some statistic there
Obvioulsy that will have been different last season but its very interesting



yeah, i was aware the system worked well a few years back, i was wondering what the stats were last season and this season as teams now seem to have developed specific tactics to use against us at set pieces.

Offline b_joseph

  • b_jesus, b_mary, b_joseph and the wee b_donkey. Unloyal gloryhunter who was probably Kelly Osbourne in another life.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 23,621
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #54 on: August 27, 2009, 12:04:51 pm »
I'm not sure what you mean there, or which system your referring to.

IF it's man to man, surely the whole point of the system is that you DON'T pass your man on? If you pass your man on, then someone else has to leave there man, so haven't you just effectively created two free men in the box?

But as I say I'm not sure what you meant, so if you could clarify ;)
Man to man.

If you have 1 defender marking an attacker at the front post and the person they are marking is static. You, as the defender that is passing on the attacking player ( to the defender already at the near post ) who has made the dash to the front post can then move to the attacker who was already at the front post because he is stationary.
The defender who was on the attacker that you are now marking, has a better shot at defending any ball that is delivered to the near post because he is already there.


Sounds muddled, I'm sorry about that. It is so much easier to explain in training or in person.

The issue with man to man though is that you need a good amount of players that are quality headers of the ball. Because you do a lot of switching, you cant have a scenario where you as a 6'4'' defender is passing on a player to a 5'9'' defender.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2009, 12:11:02 pm by b_joseph »

Offline slaphead

  • Nothing up top.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #55 on: August 27, 2009, 12:14:14 pm »

yeah, i was aware the system worked well a few years back, i was wondering what the stats were last season and this season as teams now seem to have developed specific tactics to use against us at set pieces.

Sorry
I'm not too sure - cant find anything definitive.
But my guess is we would be in the top 3 teams in the league at defending set pieces
Wheres Statto when you need him

Offline ARI

  • Main Stander
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #56 on: August 27, 2009, 12:24:18 pm »
I'd pay money to see a show with, say, Pleat, Hodgson and Taylor sat around with tea and biscuits and a chalkboard just discussing interesting tactical things...

Great idea mate - I'd just love a proper tactics show of any sort. Players are so tedious compared to tactics, it boggles the mind how much time is spent on them rather than how the game is actually played.

Just like you I'm crazy about tactics and have made it a point to understand the game more. (Damn Rafa! Look what you made me into). Your point of the lackadaisical attitude towards tactics in English football is well made. Wilson's Pyramid book to a certain extent mentions this but even more damning is Simon Kuper and Stefan Symanski's Freakonomics look a like called Why England Lose and Other Football Phenomena Explained. The examples and statistics in the book are quite numbing in terms of  the reason for the apathy towards tactics and education in football in England and confirms what I always believed about English football, never mind the standard of punditry.

Going back to Zonal marking, I think it's disgusting that none of the pundits picked up on the fact that over 3 matches against 2, far bigger English oppositions last season, Barca with much smaller players never conceded a goal employing a system not unlike ours, zonal marking plus man marking.

Not surprising too that as mentioned by another poster that Scolari employed zonal marking with Chelsea as anyone could see that's what Brazil used in the Confed Cup, although the history of zonal and Brazil go back much further. The two best teams in world use zonal! Well whaddaya know!!

I recall Tomkins numbers that in the 07 season I believe we conceded the least number of goals from setpieces in the league, a grand percentage of 1.5% with Chelsea next at 2.5%. These numbers suggest they work and until some bloody pundit can prove decisively with the numbers and examples to back him up then Rafa is right to carry on with it.

By employing zonal I don't think Rafa is saying zonal is better than man2 man but since he has obviously done enough research on it obviously he believes in the system and probably more importantly is comfortable with it.

I don't pretend to know the intricacies between man2man and zonal but I like the concept of zonal as it dovetails well with Rafa's philosophy of the team first mentality where the team takes responsibility for conceding goals as opposed to 1 player who lost his marker. Harks back to Shanks socialist leanings of the team being the be all and end all.  The reason I feel we have conceded more of late is possibly due to reasons other than the ineffectiveness of the system. A lack of confidence, rejigging of the formation, system are possible contributory factors but unfortunately pundits never look at these and hardly ever mention the mental state of teams and players, the most vital factor in top level sports, when commenting on why things happened.




Offline Wallingtonian

  • "Always been a blues fan..." <--- outed! Bless :) Waspish.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,050
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #57 on: August 27, 2009, 12:25:48 pm »
In last season's 5-1 game at Newcastle our second goal was scored by Hyypia, a header from a corner kick.  Shay Given made probably 3 great saves to prevent Liverpool scoring even more goals from corner kicks in the first half.  Newcastle's man-to-man system was never once criticised in commentary by Gray.  Then Newcastle's CB scored a header from a corner just before half-time and guess what?  Yes, it was concluded that the inherently unsound zonal marking system was to blame, although the man-to-man system was not mentioned as the cause of the mayhem at every corner kick at the other end.  It's a funny old game and no mistake!

Offline fowler_is_god9

  • Makes an electron look positive.
  • Anny Roader
  • ****
  • Posts: 408
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #58 on: August 27, 2009, 12:26:58 pm »
We used to be known as the most intelligent fans in the game.  How times have changed.

The gobshite fan base that have jumped on our bandwagon in the past few seasons are the cause but some longer term fans are also the problem.  The gobshite fan base generally listen to the media and don't have an opinion of their own.  This is bad enough but what makes it even worse is it has caused a new breed of fan, the superfan.  To combat the media influenced idiots we've now got the exact opposite.  If Benitez was playing man to man and we were all over the place looking panic stricken every corner and set piece, and the media pointed this out, there would be an exact thread saying man to man was great and the same people saying they love zonal would be saying they love man to man.

The superfan has now taken over the idiot in terms of number.  You only have to read RAWK to see this.  There is now an obvious police of people who jump on any comment which is in anyway negative to the manager which to say is unhealthy is an understatement.

People might completely back the manager but disagree with one thing eg zonal marking, 1 man up front, Gerrard in midfield and instantly they are classed as an idiot who only listens to the media.  So ironic when these people don't have an opinion of their own they just have Benitez's opinion.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2009, 12:56:48 pm by fowler_is_god9 »

Offline jDJ

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,171
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #59 on: August 27, 2009, 12:45:17 pm »
zonal marking isn't flawed, it's been used to great success by many teams all over the world for many years.

However, to concede 3 goals from set pieces this season is outrageously bad and the likes of Carra and Skrtel should be thoroughly ashamed of that Stat.

I'd like to see Riera on the pitch.  I rate him very highly as an attacking player and I think he provides a real presence in the air, both defensively and when we're attacking the opposition at set pieces.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2009, 12:46:53 pm by jDJ »

Offline The Nihilists

  • Bovvered
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,838
  • I will cut off your Johnson
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #60 on: August 27, 2009, 01:06:32 pm »
First of all, zonal cannot be blamed for the Lucas own goal. He was in the right spot at the right time and he won the ball - he just got his header wrong!

Next, how many big players and massive headers do we have?

Offline hesbighesred

  • Wallasey Wrecker. But you can call me quick fingers. After a threesome with Stevie and Alex
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 12,440
    • Collaborative thoughts on Euro 2012
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #61 on: August 27, 2009, 01:09:41 pm »
Man to man.

If you have 1 defender marking an attacker at the front post and the person they are marking is static. You, as the defender that is passing on the attacking player ( to the defender already at the near post ) who has made the dash to the front post can then move to the attacker who was already at the front post because he is stationary.
The defender who was on the attacker that you are now marking, has a better shot at defending any ball that is delivered to the near post because he is already there.


Sounds muddled, I'm sorry about that. It is so much easier to explain in training or in person.

The issue with man to man though is that you need a good amount of players that are quality headers of the ball. Because you do a lot of switching, you cant have a scenario where you as a 6'4'' defender is passing on a player to a 5'9'' defender.

Thanks man.

But doesn't that mean you'd then have 2 defenders marking the stationary near post man, which leaves our 'running' man Torres with a completely free leap and header?

That whole thing about passing on in man-to-man I'm also really, really struggling with:

1) Isn't man to man supposed to be simpler? I'm already struggling to get my head around this 'pass the parcel' aspect of giving your man over to some one else. Who do you then mark? What happens to the person who was supposed to be marking the person you then mark? How on earth do you communicate all this information in the time it takes a ball to reach someone's head from the corner flag?

That's what I mean about, surely, if you're passing on your man you've already failed? I thought the whole point of man to man was to stick to your man, and only your man, and isnt' that what Souness etc mean by responsibility? My no5 was on their 9, so if 9 gets free, I blame my 5. Simples.

2) What you describe, regardless of my quibbles above, is also something that gives the corner taker room to suddenly improvise. So, you've now got a defensive 2 on 1 against their best attacking header. Unless that happens while the ball is actually in the air I, as the corner taker, can now improvise and hit to the back post/edge of the area instead? Logically by having extra people on one man that means a shortfall somewhere else. Or maybe I'd take a short corner, allowing my men time again to lose those markers or move them somewhere we want them to be?

Still, this is what I mean about knowing the systems - this is an interesting little debate (to me) about potential merits and pitfalls of one system over another. I wouldnt' be fussed if it's this sort of stuff the media, in particular, discussed in the zonal debate (hence that BBC analysis on it was quality)- I'd love it in fact.
He is the cat who walks by himself, and all roads are alike to him.

Offline hesbighesred

  • Wallasey Wrecker. But you can call me quick fingers. After a threesome with Stevie and Alex
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 12,440
    • Collaborative thoughts on Euro 2012
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #62 on: August 27, 2009, 01:10:55 pm »
We used to be known as the most intelligent fans in the game.  How times have changed.

The gobshite fan base that have jumped on our bandwagon in the past few seasons are the cause but some longer term fans are also the problem.  The gobshite fan base generally listen to the media and don't have an opinion of their own.  This is bad enough but what makes it even worse is it has caused a new breed of fan, the superfan.  To combat the media influenced idiots we've now got the exact opposite.  If Benitez was playing man to man and we were all over the place looking panic stricken every corner and set piece, and the media pointed this out, there would be an exact thread saying man to man was great and the same people saying they love zonal would be saying they love man to man.

The superfan has now taken over the idiot in terms of number.  You only have to read RAWK to see this.  There is now an obvious police of people who jump on any comment which is in anyway negative to the manager which is to say unhealthy is understatement.

People might completely back the manager but disagree with one thing eg zonal marking, 1 man up front, Gerrard in midfield and instantly they are classed as an idiot who only listens to the media.  So ironic when these people don't have an opinion of their own they just have Benitez's opinion.


You're talking absolute bullshit there Fowler.

If you honestly think there's more 'superfans' on here then idiots, then you can't fucking count. Sorry, but that's the truth. I'm not about to take a lecture on the horrible woes of superfans from someone who can't count - or if they can count, lets their own bias twist reality to the extent you have.

There is no way there are more 'superfans' than idiots on this board. No way. If that were true, every good result, the match thread would grow to inhuman proportions full of superfans blindly cheerleading the team and how great Rafa is.

Does that happen? Does it fuck.

Instead, the forum is relatively quiet while things are going well, only to absolutely explode, as it has recently. The majority of this new traffic then. What form does it take? After Villa, was the post match thread chock full of 'Superfans' going 'no worries lads, we'll still win the league, that was a fine, unlucky performance, no problems whatsoever, I love Rafa don't you?' Was it fuck.

It was chock full of people bitching, moaning, talking about how shit we are, how Rafa needs to sort 'it' straightaway - while there's at least 5 seperate groups all fixated on one issue all equally and loudly convinced that 'it' is 'the one true problem' - for some its Zonal, others it's Gerrard not being in CM, still others it's the basic existence of Lucas - plus a massive cheerleading chorus of 'I've been saying it'll all go horribly wrong since 20XX, you should have believed me - the signs were there throughout all the devastating football we've played recently, if only you'd watched with the trained eye of a died in the wool ignorant pessimist bore with a great love of saying 'i told you so'.

You're also talking utter bollocks about the types of debates people have. No-ones been shot down on this thread for doubting zonal marking. People don't get shot down for suggesting Gerrard in CM, certainly not if they explain reasons. The one person in this thread who really has been shot down was the one who got their support of man-marking, clearly and obviously, straight out of Souness' mouth. If you come on here spouting media cliches with none of your own thought backing it up then you fucking deserve to be shot down.

There is NO WAY that there are more cheerleaders on RAWK then there are pessimist moaners. That you even think that, Fowler, says a LOT about what type of mindset you have - because I have to say one thing I've really noticed about the pessimist moaners is that, just like right wing white men, they like to paint themselves as some kind of persecuted minority, though it's their voices that blare the loudest no matter what TV/Radio/Paper you watch/listen to/read.

And RAWK is one of the best - it clearly makes an effort to try and keep the tone constructive. Looking at TIA and Liverpoolway, for example, over the last season and a half has made me want to shoot myself at times.

Even on a good day, 5 of the top topics will be stuff like:

"Just how shit it lucas anyway"
"Rafa must fix problem x,y,z NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW"
"Is Rafa a fat spanish waiter, or a c**t?"
"Why can't Rafa see the obvious wisdom of what I, Fat Dave, 45 years old, unemployed, with a GCSE in metal-work, petty criminal record and severe problems with Alcohol abuse, am saying on the internet about picking his best 11 week in week out in a 4-4-2 like wot we dun in the old days wen we wuz class?"

The superfan has taken over the idiot in terms of number.

How I wish that were true, fowler. How I fucking wish. I long for the day. I'd love to come on RAWK, or listen to talkshite, or whatever, and bathe in a glow of people just singing Rafa and the team's praises. That didn't even happen after Istanbul or the FA cup though, sadly, and it certainly isn't happening now.
He is the cat who walks by himself, and all roads are alike to him.

Offline hesbighesred

  • Wallasey Wrecker. But you can call me quick fingers. After a threesome with Stevie and Alex
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 12,440
    • Collaborative thoughts on Euro 2012
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #63 on: August 27, 2009, 01:13:41 pm »
Good post, thanks - I'll have to check out that book, so cheers for the recommendation. I loved 'Inverting the Pyramid' - in fact it's easily one of my favourite ever factual books.
He is the cat who walks by himself, and all roads are alike to him.

Online smicer07

  • Negative, miserable sod!
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 36,228
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #64 on: August 27, 2009, 01:14:49 pm »


You're talking absolute bullshit there Fowler.

If you honestly think there's more 'superfans' on here then idiots, then you can't fucking count. Sorry, but that's the truth. I'm not about to take a lecture on the horrible woes of superfans from someone who can't count - or if they can count, lets their own bias twist reality to the extent you have.

There is no way there are more 'superfans' than idiots on this board. No way. If that were true, every good result, the match thread would grow to inhuman proportions full of superfans blindly cheerleading the team and how great Rafa is.

Does that happen? Does it fuck.

Instead, the forum is relatively quiet while things are going well, only to absolutely explode, as it has recently. The majority of this new traffic then. What form does it take? After Villa, was the post match thread chock full of 'Superfans' going 'no worries lads, we'll still win the league, that was a fine, unlucky performance, no problems whatsoever, I love Rafa don't you?' Was it fuck.

It was chock full of people bitching, moaning, talking about how shit we are, how Rafa needs to sort 'it' straightaway - while there's at least 5 seperate groups all fixated on one issue all equally and loudly convinced that 'it' is 'the one true problem' - for some its Zonal, others it's Gerrard not being in CM, still others it's the basic existence of Lucas - plus a massive cheerleading chorus of 'I've been saying it'll all go horribly wrong since 20XX, you should have believed me - the signs were there throughout all the devastating football we've played recently, if only you'd watched with the trained eye of a died in the wool ignorant pessimist bore with a great love of saying 'i told you so'.

You're also talking utter bollocks about the types of debates people have. No-ones been shot down on this thread for doubting zonal marking. People don't get shot down for suggesting Gerrard in CM, certainly not if they explain reasons. The one person in this thread who really has been shot down was the one who got their support of man-marking, clearly and obviously, straight out of Souness' mouth. If you come on here spouting media cliches with none of your own thought backing it up then you fucking deserve to be shot down.

There is NO WAY that there are more cheerleaders on RAWK then there are pessimist moaners. That you even think that, Fowler, says a LOT about what type of mindset you have - because I have to say one thing I've really noticed about the pessimist moaners is that, just like right wing white men, they like to paint themselves as some kind of persecuted minority, though it's their voices that blare the loudest no matter what TV/Radio/Paper you watch/listen to/read.

And RAWK is one of the best - it clearly makes an effort to try and keep the tone constructive. Looking at TIA and Liverpoolway, for example, over the last season and a half has made me want to shoot myself at times.

Even on a good day, 5 of the top topics will be stuff like:

"Just how shit it lucas anyway"
"Rafa must fix problem x,y,z NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW"
"Is Rafa a fat spanish waiter, or a c**t?"
"Why can't Rafa see the obvious wisdom of what I, Fat Dave, 45 years old, unemployed, with a GCSE in metal-work, petty criminal record and severe problems with Alcohol abuse, am saying on the internet about picking his best 11 week in week out in a 4-4-2 like wot we dun in the old days wen we wuz class?"

The superfan has taken over the idiot in terms of number.

How I wish that were true, fowler. How I fucking wish. I long for the day. I'd love to come on RAWK, or listen to talkshite, or whatever, and bathe in a glow of people just singing Rafa and the team's praises. That didn't even happen after Istanbul or the FA cup though, sadly, and it certainly isn't happening now.

 :wellin  ;D

Offline Libertine

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,654
  • Nothing behind me, everything ahead of me
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #65 on: August 27, 2009, 01:16:34 pm »
there's a lovely quote about this in Inverting the Pyramid from Viktor Maslov, the Torpedo and Dynamo Kiev manager:

"Man-marking humiliates, insults and even morally oppresses the players who resort to it".

 :)

Offline slaphead

  • Nothing up top.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #66 on: August 27, 2009, 01:17:43 pm »
We used to be known as the most intelligent fans in the game.  How times have changed.

The gobshite fan base that have jumped on our bandwagon in the past few seasons are the cause but some longer term fans are also the problem.  The gobshite fan base generally listen to the media and don't have an opinion of their own.  This is bad enough but what makes it even worse is it has caused a new breed of fan, the superfan.  To combat the media influenced idiots we've now got the exact opposite.  If Benitez was playing man to man and we were all over the place looking panic stricken every corner and set piece, and the media pointed this out, there would be an exact thread saying man to man was great and the same people saying they love zonal would be saying they love man to man.

The superfan has now taken over the idiot in terms of number.  You only have to read RAWK to see this.  There is now an obvious police of people who jump on any comment which is in anyway negative to the manager which to say is unhealthy is an understatement.

People might completely back the manager but disagree with one thing eg zonal marking, 1 man up front, Gerrard in midfield and instantly they are classed as an idiot who only listens to the media.  So ironic when these people don't have an opinion of their own they just have Benitez's opinion.

I am a lover of Zonal Marking - no question.
Not beacuse its Rafas opinion that it works best and not because the media bang on about it all the time, but because the facts speak for themselves.
Adn the fact is we have become one of the best defensive teams in the country, while using Zonal Marking. 
I've used both systems, and I am completely sold by Zonal marking.
So I like to think of myself not as  a "superfan" or a "longer term fan" or a "gobshite fan" - simply a fan.
I make up my own mind on things, like Zonal marking, which is why I despise how the media ridicule it because they either dont understand it or dont like the idea of breaking tradition.
I dont class anyone on here an idiot - the only people I class as idiots are the people who are supposed to know better - like the afore mentioned media.
They are the ones who have the power to make peoples mind up about things. They are the ones who drive public opinion.

Offline fowler_is_god9

  • Makes an electron look positive.
  • Anny Roader
  • ****
  • Posts: 408
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #67 on: August 27, 2009, 01:19:47 pm »
First of all, zonal cannot be blamed for the Lucas own goal. He was in the right spot at the right time and he won the ball - he just got his header wrong!

Next, how many big players and massive headers do we have?

Does that really matter?  We could have the keeper, nine 6 foot 10 players and a 3 foot nothing player and Rafa would have that 3 foot nothing player in the box defending corners if we wer 2 nil down.

Online smicer07

  • Negative, miserable sod!
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 36,228
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #68 on: August 27, 2009, 01:20:46 pm »
Does that really matter?  We could have the keeper, nine 6 foot 10 players and a 3 foot nothing player and Rafa would have that 3 foot nothing player in the box defending corners if we wer 2 nil down.

Sammy Lee?

Offline fowler_is_god9

  • Makes an electron look positive.
  • Anny Roader
  • ****
  • Posts: 408
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #69 on: August 27, 2009, 01:25:14 pm »
I am a lover of Zonal Marking - no question.
Not beacuse its Rafas opinion that it works best and not because the media bang on about it all the time, but because the facts speak for themselves.
Adn the fact is we have become one of the best defensive teams in the country, while using Zonal Marking. 
I've used both systems, and I am completely sold by Zonal marking.
So I like to think of myself not as  a "superfan" or a "longer term fan" or a "gobshite fan" - simply a fan.
I make up my own mind on things, like Zonal marking, which is why I despise how the media ridicule it because they either dont understand it or dont like the idea of breaking tradition.
I dont class anyone on here an idiot - the only people I class as idiots are the people who are supposed to know better - like the afore mentioned media.
They are the ones who have the power to make peoples mind up about things. They are the ones who drive public opinion.

That is perfectly fine.  It's your opinion and you haven't expressed it by trying to make anyone look like an idiot or told everyone they must agree with you.  You are a breed of fan that is dying out.  I am not against zonal marking generally myself.  We have one of the best defences in the league, I agree.  It's just that nearly every game I go to now I see us concede a corner and us go to pieces.  In any sport if you consistently do the same thing someone will find a flaw with it.  Man to man marking is hardly perfect either but it seems to me that some teams have a way of attacking zonal marking and for the past season and a bit it has cost us.

Offline RedMarko

  • Master arsonist and goat hater
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,852
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
    • TW42 now!!
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #70 on: August 27, 2009, 01:26:55 pm »
We used to be known as the most intelligent fans in the game.  How times have changed.

The gobshite fan base that have jumped on our bandwagon in the past few seasons are the cause but some longer term fans are also the problem.  The gobshite fan base generally listen to the media and don't have an opinion of their own.  This is bad enough but what makes it even worse is it has caused a new breed of fan, the superfan.  To combat the media influenced idiots we've now got the exact opposite.  If Benitez was playing man to man and we were all over the place looking panic stricken every corner and set piece, and the media pointed this out, there would be an exact thread saying man to man was great and the same people saying they love zonal would be saying they love man to man.

The superfan has now taken over the idiot in terms of number.  You only have to read RAWK to see this.  There is now an obvious police of people who jump on any comment which is in anyway negative to the manager which to say is unhealthy is an understatement.

People might completely back the manager but disagree with one thing eg zonal marking, 1 man up front, Gerrard in midfield and instantly they are classed as an idiot who only listens to the media.  So ironic when these people don't have an opinion of their own they just have Benitez's opinion.

I think you'll find that the internet has changed how people express themselves.
 
I am a fan of zonal marking. I have explained why. And yet you seem to want to label me some 'superfan' because I follow Rafa blindly.
 
To that point - I'd fuckin' love top be a superfan. I try my best to be the best fan of LFC that I can. for me that includes supporting the managers tactics and chosen players/purchases.
 
I have yet to read a definition of supporter that reads:
 
'Supporter: a person who openly expresses opinion against their supposed favourite team on an internet forum for all the world to read whilst contending that that is what the forum is for and they 'have the right' to do so.'
 
Yes - you have the right to do so. but it is not a sign of support.
 
Yes - we all get frustrated at decisions - but that's what chatting to your mates is for.
 
 
As long as Rafa is manager I will support his decisions. If that offends you. Great. If it makes me a 'super fan' even better.
 
Better a super fan of LFC than someone who feels they know more than professionals in the game and feel the need to express such on the internet.

Offline The Nihilists

  • Bovvered
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,838
  • I will cut off your Johnson
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #71 on: August 27, 2009, 01:29:06 pm »
Does that really matter?  We could have the keeper, nine 6 foot 10 players and a 3 foot nothing player and Rafa would have that 3 foot nothing player in the box defending corners if we wer 2 nil down.


Oh Jesus, that's your answer is it? <shakes head in despair>


Offline TrueYorkshireRed

  • That'll be Barnsley then yeah?
  • Anny Roader
  • ****
  • Posts: 391
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #72 on: August 27, 2009, 01:30:54 pm »
The way the fuckers go on about it...especially Tylers monkey and that twat on ITV...you'd think teams that employ man-to-man marking never ship a goal.

The fact is when a team is man-to-man marking its easy to pick out an individual and say who wasnt doing their job and blame that one person...in zonal marking its harder to blame an individual so they blame the system.

As its been said...I think by Alan Hansen on MOTD...on man-to-man marking it only takes one person to switch off to allow a free header and probable easy goal...whereas with zonal marking to allow a free header and probable goal takes a couple of people to not do their job...which is whats happened to us a couple of times so far this season...but not just from set-pieces...I think we've been poor all round defensively for large chunks of the games so far.

Commentators also seem to forget that whatever defensive system a team employs...the attacking team is trying to score...so ineveitabley on occasion their attacking system will beat the defensive system resulting in a goal...how boring would football be otherwise!

Offline slaphead

  • Nothing up top.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #73 on: August 27, 2009, 01:31:46 pm »
That is perfectly fine.  It's your opinion and you haven't expressed it by trying to make anyone look like an idiot or told everyone they must agree with you.  You are a breed of fan that is dying out.  I am not against zonal marking generally myself.  We have one of the best defences in the league, I agree.  It's just that nearly every game I go to now I see us concede a corner and us go to pieces.  In any sport if you consistently do the same thing someone will find a flaw with it.  Man to man marking is hardly perfect either but it seems to me that some teams have a way of attacking zonal marking and for the past season and a bit it has cost us.

Ok good point
Thats what I like about RAWK too by the way, there is a sense of debate rather than a  slanging match
Because of my experiences with it - I find myself very defensive when it comes to Zonal Marking cirticism (excuse the pun)
And I know I shouldn't - but I get very wound up by Sky etc.
I just dont get to as many games as I would like so have to make do with their coverage of games.

Offline GBF

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 19,043
  • The only religion with a God that you can touch!
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #74 on: August 27, 2009, 01:32:21 pm »
All the systems are the best, its only the personnel which make them worst, but our problem isnt the defending part, its attacking at set pieces.  Whatever system we are using there, it is not working well.
01111001 01101111 01110101 00100111 01101100 01101100 00100000 01101110 01100101 01110110 01100101 01110010 00100000 01110111 01100001 01101100 01101011 00100000 01100001 01101100 01101111 01101110 01100101

Offline hesbighesred

  • Wallasey Wrecker. But you can call me quick fingers. After a threesome with Stevie and Alex
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 12,440
    • Collaborative thoughts on Euro 2012
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #75 on: August 27, 2009, 01:33:04 pm »
Does that really matter?  We could have the keeper, nine 6 foot 10 players and a 3 foot nothing player and Rafa would have that 3 foot nothing player in the box defending corners if we wer 2 nil down.
Keeping everyone in the box is actually an attacking, not a defensive tactic.

Go and watch Keane's (2nd?) goal against Bolton again - it explains why better than I ever could. We also routinely break at speed from defending a corner, generally with Kuyt, Mash, Torres and Gerrard using their respective combinations of drive, movement and sheer pace to get into some devastating positions, with space and time ahead of them to play into.

Arsenal used to do this all the time - there was even an MOTD little analysis thing about exactly why this is an attacking tactic in which they showed Arsenal making exactly the type of breaking at pace that we do from corners almost every match. We probably make more decent chances from opposition corners than we do from our own.
He is the cat who walks by himself, and all roads are alike to him.

Offline slaphead

  • Nothing up top.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #76 on: August 27, 2009, 01:33:24 pm »

Commentators also seem to forget that whatever defensive system a team employs...the attacking team is trying to score...so ineveitabley on occasion their attacking system will beat the defensive system resulting in a goal...how boring would football be otherwise!


Spot fucking on my friend

Offline hesbighesred

  • Wallasey Wrecker. But you can call me quick fingers. After a threesome with Stevie and Alex
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 12,440
    • Collaborative thoughts on Euro 2012
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #77 on: August 27, 2009, 01:33:59 pm »
there's a lovely quote about this in Inverting the Pyramid from Viktor Maslov, the Torpedo and Dynamo Kiev manager:

"Man-marking humiliates, insults and even morally oppresses the players who resort to it".

 :)
Class quote that - Maslov was a genius.

EDIT -

Maslov was not a genius because of his passionate views on zonal. I just love the way he expresses it, hence why I like the quote. He was a genius because, if you read up about him, he changed the face of football and was a generation ahead of his time, tactically.
« Last Edit: August 27, 2009, 01:38:53 pm by hesbighesred »
He is the cat who walks by himself, and all roads are alike to him.

Offline slaphead

  • Nothing up top.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,243
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #78 on: August 27, 2009, 01:37:18 pm »
Keeping everyone in the box is actually an attacking, not a defensive tactic.

Go and watch Keane's (2nd?) goal against Bolton again - it explains why better than I ever could. We also routinely break at speed from defending a corner, generally with Kuyt, Mash, Torres and Gerrard using their respective combinations of drive, movement and sheer pace to get into some devastating positions, with space and time ahead of them to play into.

Arsenal used to do this all the time - there was even an MOTD little analysis thing about exactly why this is an attacking tactic in which they showed Arsenal making exactly the type of breaking at pace that we do from corners almost every match. We probably make more decent chances from opposition corners than we do from our own.

My word the last line there tells a story.
Its true though, 4 or 5 players breaking at pace is one scary sight for a defender. Give me someone standing static on the half way line anyday.

Offline Jason McG

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,911
Re: Zonal Marking
« Reply #79 on: August 27, 2009, 01:46:44 pm »
I just love how everyone slags it off in the media yet I think Lee Dixon admitted they used it in the Adams/Bould days... tell me if I'm wrong but weren't they known for being mean in defence? :)

I remember him saying that and the motd team swept it under the carpet quick smart :)
I'm so fucking angry I'm rubbing my face!!!