Are people who believe in God clueless bellends?
Where on the bell end scale would you put a religious man compared to a man that believes we never went to the moon?
Also, based on some of the photographic evidence, do you think that some photos were taken back on earth or doctored back on earth?
No I don't believe that believing in god is bellendery although religion and conspiracy are on the same continuum. They are both about our natural desire to make sense of the world. It feels 'right' if there is some over-arching structure or meaning to everything that happens. I'm as guilty as anyone for having the impulse to think that what I wear might impact the outcome of a football match for example. We look for patterns in the world around us. The difference between religion and conspiracy theory is that to be fair to those who are religious, there is no absolute evidence to say there is no God. For the moon landings and 9/11, the evidence is incontrovertible that they happened. There is absolute proof, beyond any reasonable doubt, that the 'official' story is correct.
So on a scale of one to ten, a religious person is not a bellend at all, just misguided (in my opinion), but a person who wilfully maintains that the moon landings was a hoax in the face of all evidence, on the basis o the gormless twats who promote the conspiracy, is an eleven.
And no, the pictures weren't doctored. I know what you're referring to and it just highlights the stupidity of the dozy, clueless pricks who make the claims. A basic understanding of the way cameras and film works, basic optics, parallax, perspective etc would render all the claims meaningless. It takes a deep level of stupidity or wilfull ignorance to relieve any of that shit.
