I'm glad I'm not the only who noticed this. It's not all that recent a style for them either. For many years in europe and nearly 2 seasons in the league. 2 Players sitting deep and passing sideways.
Yup.
I'd go even further than that.
Fergie is ruthless, a peerless man manager and phenomenal at implementing tough changes at the right time.
However he isn't a spectacular innovator or tactical thinker.
I honestly believe, honestly, that within a couple of years of arriving on these shores, Fergie saw which way the wind was blowing, saw what Rafa was going for and how well it could work, and set out to achieve much the same. In Rafa's first couple of seasons Fergie was still more wedded to a 4-4-2, despite the influence of the (at one time) much maligned 'negative' Queiroz.
However, he's switched increasingly to a 4-5-1 variant, has completely abandoned having an attacking midfielder (a staple of his first 20 years or so), has wingers who cut in more and more (with the likes of Rooney, Park and Tevez often making a Kuyt like hard working option...though R and T are obviously superior), and has been, especially these last two years, rotating quite ruthlessly...even more so than Benítez does, especially in terms of leaving out his 'stars' and in rotating key areas that people get all frothy about when we do it (EG CM and CB).
Look at his European tactics in particular...and that for me is the clincher and the reason why he's embraced a lot of Rafa's philosophy (IE to win in Europe) and the last two seasons he's played very much like we did in Rafa's first couple of seasons, IE keeping it ridiculously tight.
Very annoying that Fergie is still somehow credited with playing expansively in Europe...which they certainly didn't last season, maybe have started to a bit this season (Inter being a positive display, though seemingly a counter attack based one rather than them controlling the opposition) wheras we have developed from solidity and countering to actually being a team that dominates the very best teams on their home grounds...Inter, Barca, Real...the latter have dismissed us defensive but both are wrong. We out created and out possessed both clubs, starting defensively but getting an increasing grip on the match an deventually dominating.
A pure countering side does not recover from 1-0 down at the Nou Camp FFS. How does a defensive side like us become the only team (correct me if I'm wrong) to have come from behind to beat the Mancs this year? Has anyone else even scored 2 past them? In fact, how did this myth of us being a defensive, counter attacking side start? Defensive I can just about cope with...but if it is defensive it's defensive in the style of Milan/Juve and co circa early 90's...defense based on control of possession and carefully picked and worked attacks...not 10 behind the ball and break at great pace where possible. Maybe that's why Inter showed us proper respect after our victory...the Italians know the difference between desperate defence and actual control of a game better than anyone.