Author Topic: More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA  (Read 1822 times)

Offline PiranhaBill

  • Main Stander
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA
« on: November 23, 2006, 09:06:41 am »
http://icliverpool.icnetwork.co.uk/0500liverpoolfc/0100news/tm_headline=agency-refuses-to-hand-over-%2Dpound%2D9m-to-liverpool-fc%26method=full%26objectid=18143611%26siteid=50061-name_page.htmlhttp://

Agency refuses to hand over £9m to Liverpool FCNov 23 2006

 

 
By Larry Neild City Editor, Daily Post
 
 
MERSEYSIDE'S biggest government agency, the NWDA, is refusing to hand over £9m to Liverpool FC, despite preparatory work starting on a massive New Anfield project funded by another government arm.

Club executives have signed a deal with Liverpool City Council guaranteeing to underwrite £1m-worth of improvement work at Stanley Park.

It will enable work on the restoration of the Victorian park to be planned, rather than wait until the funding squabble is resolved. Up to £9m of European funding has to be spent within a certain timescale to avoid funding managers in Brussels clawing back the cash.

But there is still no sign that a similar amount of vital public funding will be released by the Northwest Development Agency.

NWDA chief executive Steven Broomhead said: "The agency has yet to see any clear evidence of the club's ability to commence with the stadium project, that is to raise the necessary funds. We are eager for the project to start, and we have ring-fenced funding from the agency as our contribution."

Liverpool City Council has agreed to be the legal responsible body for public funding, which means the council will have to refund public money spent if the stadium project collapses.


Without the underwriting deal, city council tax payers could have been left picking up the bill for the park improvements if the overall stadium project had not gone ahead.


Merseyside's Objective 1 projects committee agreed to fund public realm works around the proposed new stadium to the tune of £9m after receiving the club's assurances that it had a package in place to pay for the new £190m 60,000-seater stadium.


But NWDA officials in Warrington say they have written several letters to the club's chief executive, Rick Parry, asking for clarification.


It is understood that concerns raised by officials at the Warrington agency include possible changes of ownership at Anfield.


One source close to the agency said last night: "There is a lot of speculation about the future ownership of the club. If a new owner does take over, that person, or those people, may have a different attitude to a new ground, or towards a shared stadium with Everton. They may even want to look at the level of debt at Anfield before committing to a new stadium."


Club officials continue to make guarded comments about the future, insisting the club is committed to delivering a new stadium.


Last night, Frank McKenna, chairman of Downtown Liverpool in Business, said: "It really is about time the club proved it has the funding and is starting work on the new ground. There are other projects eager for funding, such as the proposed extension of the runway at Liverpool John Lennon Airport.


"Some people suggest that the runway extension is far more crucial anyway to the local economy than a football stadium. The club must finally come forward and show people the colour of its money."


Last night, a Liverpool council spokesman said: "The city council accepted the grant offer from Objective 1 earlier this month, following discussions with Liverpool Football Club, during which we were reassured that they are making satisfactory progress in getting the funding for the scheme in place.


"We are now proceeding with preparatory work such as finalising the joint venture company and securing contracts ahead of the start of the development of the scheme. We will not be starting on site with actual works until we have full confirmation that their funding and the money from the Northwest Development Agency is in place."


http://icliverpool.icnetwork.co.uk/0500liverpoolfc/0100news/tm_headline=ownership-must-be-established-before-stadium-issue-can-be-resolved%26method=full%26objectid=18143613%26siteid=50061-name_page.html

Ownership must be established before stadium issue can be resolvedNov 23 2006

 

 
Daily Post
 
 
THE need to resolve the stadium issue is intrinsically tied up with the future ownership of Liverpool FC.

The club's board of directors had been scheduled to meet today, but it is understood that will not happen. When the directors do meet, they will be told about two serious contenders for the club. US billionaire George Gillett, owner of the Montreal Canadians ice hockey club, is said to be the leading contender.

Bankers NM Rothschild are reported to be advising the Gillett bid, which would see an offer of around £250m for the club. That would be £150m to purchase the shares, with £100m to cover the club's existing debts. Gillett would also provide a commitment to fund the new stadium.

Also a high player in the takeover race is Dubai International Capital, Emirates private equity arm, advised by JP Morgan, who arranged financing for the deal by Malcolm Glazer to take over Manchester United. Wealthy Belfast-based property tycoon John Miskelly is thought to be a third bidder.

The club chairman, David Moores, a member of the Littlewoods dynasty, owns 51% of the shares in Liverpool FC.
 



Offline S24 LFC

  • For Sale!
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,440
  • Part of the establishment
Re: More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA
« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2006, 09:33:14 am »
more shite
Our round the world trip.

www.getjealous.com/sas091011

Offline GibletII

  • Anny Roader
  • ****
  • Posts: 423
  • Fug Off Luton
Re: More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA
« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2006, 10:07:53 am »
It's a non story, the Post and Echo seem to be in bed with certain people/agencys with agendas.

The reason why is far from clear but the output of Liverpools printed media all round is very weak and does a disservice to the city region.

It also highlights the folly of grants and the region structure. Going begging to to some civil servant in Warrington...isn't Liverpool big enough to run it's own finances? And grants to build a runway at the airport - I thought Peel was a private company, if there's a business case they can fund the runway themselves - spend teh grants on transport infrastructure to and from the airport and stadiums!!

Offline nidgemo

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 20,836
  • Semper in excremento, sole profundum qui variat.
  • Super Title: Coming soon! Official Launch May 2008
Re: More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA
« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2006, 10:30:14 am »
Quote
Agency refuses to hand over £9m to Liverpool FCNov 23 2006

Daily Post
 
the NWDA, is refusing to hand over £9m to Liverpool FC

"If a new owner does take over, that person, or those people, may have a different attitude... towards a shared stadium with Everton."

That about sums that up.

The post shit stirring again, and the wanking, fucking, arseholes in tyhe NWDA STILL wanting a shared stadium.

If they're so fucking concerned about proof of funding, perhaps they should go and ask everton do they have their half of the 200 million cost for this fucking shared stadium they keep pushing...
I'm no longer on RAWK, but if you need to contact me about anything, you can email me on nigelmorrison@connectfree.co.uk

Offline Paul

  • Pensioner Abuser
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,468
Re: More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2006, 10:36:53 am »
Dont believe anything in the Post / Echo anymore.

The other week they were claiming Ashworth hospital is being converted into a Category A prison.

What is really happening is they are taking some cat B prison in a wing to be temporarily converted whilst the overcrowding is dealt with.

Hardly the same thing

Online FlashingBlade

  • Organised a piss up in a brewery. Ended up in his pants with a KFC bucket. Future MP. Eats only Fish Heads and Tails. Can't spell 'DOMUM'. Now has no balls.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 8,861
  • From a Shankly Boy to a Klopp Man
Re: More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA
« Reply #5 on: November 23, 2006, 12:24:55 pm »
"..towards a shared stadium with Everton"..theres still some desperate souls out there in the ocean of denial  hoping for the good ship  "Shared Stadium" to come along and rescue them  ....are they waving or drowning ?


Offline Ben S

  • Remember we were partners in crime. Pigeon Fancier. GTL Bus Freak. Also known as Bambi, apparently - or Miss Kitty on Wednesdays....
  • RAWK Staff.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,278
  • Liverpool 5 - 1 London
Re: More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA
« Reply #6 on: November 23, 2006, 08:06:46 pm »
Since when have we had a £100 million debt, guess we can thank Morgan for all this bollocks made up debt shite, twat.

As for the Post, is anyone surprised, shower of c*nts.

Offline ratcatcher

  • Glass is often half-empty...and it's all Parry's fault
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,601
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA
« Reply #7 on: November 23, 2006, 10:07:12 pm »
Since when have we had a £100 million debt, guess we can thank Morgan for all this bollocks made up debt shite, twat.

As for the Post, is anyone surprised, shower of c*nts.
I'd argue that whatever the source, its for the club to show categorically the debt isnt that much. Clearly, they are losing the battle here if more people quote the higher figure (and I understood Morgan said the debt was £70m not £100m)
These are my own opinions. They are not meant or intended as a criticism of anyone else's opinion just because they are different but if you can't see past that, then tough shit!

Offline BrianL

  • Anny Roader
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA
« Reply #8 on: November 25, 2006, 08:37:13 am »
I've never seem or heard Morgan so have no axe to grind with him, apart from the crassness of his offer being delivered the way it once was, but he has never

But i fuckin hate the prick for starting this shite about us being £70m in debt, which certain people have used against us, and inflated every month since.

And why should the club have to prove something is false? Let others prove the level of debt is as high as they say.

But - the club should be proving the truth, i.e. in this case that they have the funding available, and shut these shit-stirrers up. Until they do we'll have to put up with this crap.

Offline ttnbd

  • RAWK Chief Financial Officer
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 18,975
  • ANFIELD4EVER
Re: More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA
« Reply #9 on: November 25, 2006, 08:55:20 am »
But - the club should be proving the truth, i.e. in this case that they have the funding available, and shut these shit-stirrers up. Until they do we'll have to put up with this crap.

but they've already done that, the european objective 1 grant wouldn't have been secured if funding wasn't in place.
So all say thanks to the Shanks

He never walked alone

Lets sing our song for all the world

From this his Liverpool home

Offline BrianL

  • Anny Roader
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: More positive Spin (not) from the Post & NWDA
« Reply #10 on: November 25, 2006, 12:20:21 pm »
well it's not unreasonable on the face of it for a totally separate body to ask to see it then is it?
If there's more to what the NWDA are asking and they're messing the club around, then i want to see the club fighting it's corner publicly, because this drip drip from the media/NWDA is denigrating.