Oh its definitely helps picking the right batters in the first place to help us win matches. I agree with getting rid of the Finch and the Marsh brothers. None of them should ever play test cricket for Australia again, I think they have had more than enough chances. I wouldn't mind seeing a lineup like that for the next test and Sri Lanka series, Add Smith to that for the Ashes and you are giving yourself a much better platform to score runs.
I would also consider adding Jake Lehmann to the mix as well.
Yeah I don't love Head at 4, might be a bit high, but whoever is there is just a placeholder for Smith. Then best of Head and Wade can remain at 5.
And yeah absolutely Jake Lehmann. Has had a couple decent seasons and actually bats middle order, rather than trying to force an opener into the spot.
Harris hasn't set the world on fire but he's not looked out of his depth. He's been rewarded for a few good seasons opening so I say stick with him. Even Renshaw could have opened with him easily if he hadn't started the Shield year badly. I like Renshaw. Burns averaging 50+ opening in his last 13 Shield games. Will Pucovski looks like one to take a gamble on. How we ended up with Finch is just absurd. It's this obsession we have with contrasting openers. Langer and Hayden, Stackpole and Lawry, Rogers and Warner. I'd hate to describe what we're doing as overthinking it but you really just need to pick your best performing openers.
If you really want to be creative do it at the bottom like I saw from SB Tang on twitter. James Pattinson at 7. Pain down to 8.
Burns
Harris
Khawaja
Head
Wade/Lehmann
Maxwell
Pattinson/Stoinis
Paine
Cummins
Lyon
Hazlewood