I don't understand why people hailed Bazball as this great revolution in test cricket, the results England have achieved with this approach are pretty similar to what they had before Bazball
McCullum arrived in May 22.
We'd just lost in the Windies, lost the Ashes 4-1, lost at home to India, lost at home to New Zealand, lost to India in India and beat Sri Lanka in the six series before 'Bazball' (W1, D0, L5)
And we've beat New Zealand, beat South Africa, beat Pakistan, drew with New Zealand, drew the Ashes and are now losing in India in the six series since (W3, D2, L1)
Similar in a way, sure. As in...played roughly the same teams? Each match had roughly the same amount of..wickets? They were played on roughly similar pitches?