Hodgson's 10/11 season
With LFC
Played 20, Points 25, 1.25 PPG. (7W, 4D, 9L). GD -3.
Over the whole season to date, that PPG is better than 11 teams, and is level with Fulham's. (Fulham have a GD of +4).
So LFC would currently be approximately 9th in the table if our form in Games 21 to 36 had matched that of the first 20 games.
With WBA
Played 12, Points 20, 1.67 PPG. (5W, 5D, 2L). GD +2.
Over the whole season to date, only 4 teams (MU, Chelsea, Arsenal, Man C) have a PPG better than 1.67. Apart from LFC, the next best is Spurs with 1.56.
Overall
Played 32, Points 45, 1.41 PPG. (12W, 9D, 11L). GD -1.
Over the whole season to date, that PPG is better than 14 teams. ie, not counting LFC, only 5 teams have a better PPG.
So Hodgson's combined PPG works out at approx 53 or 54 points over 38 games. Last season that was better than 12 teams. The season before it was better than 13 or 14 teams.
Obviously Hodgson's combined PPG is not as good as LFC's combined PPG (that of Hodgson plus Kenny), which is 1.61. So Kenny has done much better at LFC than Roy has done at WBA.
So if Hodgson had stayed with LFC,