Ha!
Can't recall another team filing charges against another team on the bases of tampering.
If I was Indy, I'd have an internal analysis and try to work out how they went from being 1-2 players from challenging a formidable Heat team for the title of best team in the East, and now can't keep hold of their star player whilst seemingly dismantling the whole core of that team.
It's easy to point the finger at Bird, but something stinks in Indy. Only the Knicks can collapse faster than that, that's how low Indy have reached.
I did a bit of a research, it looks like tampering is only when a GM, head of basketball operations, owners, coach etc (pretty much any management staff) are involved. there were 3 teams punished for tampering back in 2013 who were all fined "undisclosed amounts".
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/9362896/three-nba-teams-fined-tampering-ahead-free-agency"The Miami Heat were discovered to have tampered with Pat Riley in 1995 by negotiating with Riley while he was the head coach of the New York Knicks. The Heat "settled," and avoided league-imposed penalties, by compensating the Knicks with $1 million and their first round draft pick in 1996."
The NBA would most likely fine the Lakers (if they were found to have legitimately been tampering), but if it's an extreme case, the Lakers could potentially lose draft picks (like what happened to the Timberwolves, link is below)
http://ftw.usatoday.com/2014/01/nba-joe-smith-illegal-contract-timberwolvesSo it looks like penalties are usually cash settlement, draft picks and/or prohibit a team from signing the player or they can take away picks.
By the way, you are right about the management of Pacers, they shot themselves in the foot by not trading PG last winter, afterwards PG saying he was going to sign with the Lakers and devaluatinghis trade market didn't help.
If I was Utah Jazz, I'd definitely file it against the Celtics since the head coach was in contact with Hayward way before he was a free agent.