The guy doesn't want to put a vaccine in his body - not a crime.
He wants to play tennis - not a crime.
He's uniquely placed to not infect others because of the regularity at which he gets tested, tennis being an individual sport, and the amount of scrutiny he will be under.
I get that it may set a dangerous precedent, but this simplistic "one rule for the elite, one rule for the rest" is also a bit lame. Listen I've got every reason to agree with you guys because I've been through terrible bereavement last year due to Covid, although I also lost my Father from cardiac arrest 7 days after he took the vaccine. I still went ahead and made sure my whole family got vaccinated. So I'm not an anti vaxxer - I just believe fundamental personal liberties must be protected, even if it throws up difficult problems such as this.
Seriously - the uproar is OTT and he's being made into a pantomime villain by the public. Different rules SHOULD apply to an elite sportsperson like him - it's just a fact. He has a right not to have a vaccine forced into him in order to play tennis. People are losing a sense of individual liberty.
I believe in taking the vaccine, but I will defend the right of others not to take it unless absolutely necessary (like if you're a Doctor in a hospital). You can't judge an elite tennis player in the same way.
I wish people would just try to see the other side and not get so defensive if the opinion held on here sits in the minority, as mine clearly seems to.