thought exactly the same thing, there is no clear and obvious, it hit his hand! It's not difficult to understand
Danny Murphy bleating on about "clear and obvious" - it doesnt matter with the handball law, you dickhead.
Its all about winning shiny things.
Norwich’s manager looks & sounds like a Die Hard baddie.
If he's being asked to head the ball too frequently - which isn't exactly his specialty - it could affect his ear and cause an infection. Especially if the ball hits him on the ear directly.
The flags at Goodison
If your moral compass is Piers Moron then I ask you to think whether someone who oversaw illegal phone hacking and published fake pictures depicting War Crimes is an appropriate person to look up to. In fact, I'd suggest you're a bit of a c*nt.
Very plasticy....is that a word? And they take the piss out of us for our flags!!
The irony of Dyche moaning about shithouse players. Get your own house in order first.
Maybe now we have VAR the pundits and commentators will actually bother to learn the rules of the game as its already made them all sound and look like clueless dickheads.Actually...... nah, they probably won't as they still think their opinions are right and rules don't count.Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Lineker:Accidental handball has never counted EVER in football? Hang on, I'm pretty sure that if it hit your hand in the 50s, 60s and 70s and probably the 80s it was ALWAYS given as a handball.And what's this shit about if it hits a defenders hand accidently, nothing will be given?
What about Solanke a few years ago at home v West Brom, can of his chest, hit his arm and in I think.... and was disallowed for handball even though it was accidental? Most pundits make statements that can be disproved within second of them saying it!
Serious question about VAR...would the 'beach ball' goal against us stood?
Tim Cahill phenomenally boring pundit.
Are these for real? This is punditry 2019
VAR and the handball rule are both shite to be fair.
A question posed by pundits this weekend: why are we trying to make football perfect through VAR? The answer is very simple: twenty years of myopic analysis and replays on BBC, Sky, and BT. Every week for decades referees were proved to be incorrect in some of their decisions through super slow motion replays, offside replays done to death, and absolute castigation by said pundits as a result. The obvious solution is to use the same technology in-game to correct those decisions. So far, it has largely worked although there have been doubts about its application, and doubts about the laws of the game themselves as a result. Those same pundits therefore completely cannot position themselves to criticise VAR. It was their use of technology in their punditry in their first place to prove referees were getting decisions wrong time after time week in week out that has led to its introduction and application. It is therefore sheer hypocrisy for them to now say VAR is now ruining the game. There would be no need for it has they not used technology themselves to point out refereeing errors with it for the last twenty years.Rich (Cambridge).
Really good letter in F365 today about the pundits and VAR
