Topic: Autocorrect request

[Andy @ Allerton!]

Please can we have one for 'Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson' or 'Boris' that auto-corrects to his real name:

Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson

[TepidT2O]

Only if we can have. Jeremy Richard Streynsham Hunt Too

[Barneylfc∗]

Would of
Should of
Could of

I can't think of anything that would be affected by these being corrected to what they should be.

[CraigDS]

Would of
Should of
Could of

I can't think of anything that would be affected by these being corrected to what they should be.

There will definitely be something which will be affected which should of been thought of before though.

[SP]

Would of
Should of
Could of

I can't think of anything that would be affected by these being corrected to what they should be.

Why should we spare people's grammar blushes?

[Barneylfc∗]

Why should we spare people's grammar blushes?

Because it boils my piss 

[SP]

Because it boils my piss 

Even more of a reason not to implement it. I would of implemented it if it was not for your delicious pain.

[Barneylfc∗]

Even more of a reason not to implement it. I would of implemented it if it was not for your delicious pain.

  I've just come across one that would be affected while reading about article 50. It would of course have a negative affect on saying 'would of course' 

[reddebs]

I'm all for correct grammer, it makes reading much easier but shouldn't the suggestion have been

Should have, would have, could have?

I know it's all in the context of the sentence but most of the time when people use "of" the correct word should be "have".

[Barneylfc∗]

I'm all for correct grammer, it makes reading much easier but shouldn't the suggestion have been

Should have, would have, could have?

I know it's all in the context of the sentence but most of the time when people use "of" the correct word should be "have".

It was for the incorrect usage to be corrected to the correct usage.

[reddebs]

It was for the incorrect usage to be corrected to the correct usage.

That makes more sense then and quite agree on it's usage 

[redgriffin73]

I'm all for correct grammer, it makes reading much easier but shouldn't the suggestion have been

Should have, would have, could have?

I know it's all in the context of the sentence but most of the time when people use "of" the correct word should be "have".

*grammar

[terrible suits]

That makes more sense then and quite agree on it's usage 

Any time someone uses an apostrophe before the letter s, can we get a message board prompt asking "Are you sure you really want to put that apostrophe there?"

(*its usage)

[jed the red]

I've just come across one that would be affected while reading about article 50. It would of course have a negative affect on saying 'would of course' 

Would there not be a comma after the 'would' and after the 'course'? Can somebody confirm this?

[Claire.]

Can everyone stop crying over stupid things.

Thanks.

[terrible suits]

Can everyone stop crying over stupid things.

Thanks.

Who's crying?
The'se change's are 'simply hilariou's.

[Barneylfc∗]

MoPo

Its not big and it's not clever. A ban handed out to anyone that uses it too.

[Claire.]

You do know you've effectively applied for a ban there, Barney.

[Barneylfc∗]

Midgetland to Midtjylland


Whilst Midgetland might have been slightly amusing 10 years ago, it isn't now.

[Skeeve]

A new autocorrect request, can ... be autocorrected to .

[SP]

A new autocorrect request, can ... be autocorrected to .

No…

[SP]

Or even no…