Author Topic: Line of Duty (Read 87433 times)

Mag Hull · « **Reply #240 on:** April 2, 2017, 09:08:21 pm »

WTF?

?!!

Mag Hull · « **Reply #241 on:** April 2, 2017, 10:01:38 pm »

Total headfuck that episode - how wrong was I ref Ep 1?

Alan_X · « **Reply #242 on:** April 2, 2017, 10:04:55 pm »

Quote from: Kashinoda on March 28, 2017, 09:56:24 am

A bit too obvious how this plays out now? Should be a good season though.

Or not...

Mag Hull · « **Reply #243 on:** April 2, 2017, 10:13:49 pm »

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2017/mar/26/line-of-duty-recap-series-two-episode-one

https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2017/apr/02/line-of-duty-recap-series-four-episode-two-who-is-the-real-balaclava-man

rob1966 · « **Reply #244 on:** April 2, 2017, 10:34:17 pm »

I only got onto this last week, had totally passed me by, its brilliant.

Mag Hull · « **Reply #245 on:** April 2, 2017, 10:57:54 pm »

Spoiler

So another connection to series 1 with Buckles back is well as Hilton, which leads to the question could the cases be linked. Anyone notice another connection with Tims fingers been removed just like the victims in series 1?

[close]

oldfordie · « **Reply #246 on:** April 2, 2017, 11:55:30 pm »

Well I knew she wasn't dead but didn't want to spoil it for everyone.

Spoiler

Someone mentioned she was in a BBC trailer in a scene not shown in episode 1,BBC slipped up their.

[close]

Spoiler

Wonder how she knew the password for Tims laptop, can only assume shes watched him type it in after he pulled back from killing her, shes looked at evidence she shouldn't know about and might drop herself in it if she mentions it in a later episode

[close]

Buck Pete · « **Reply #247 on:** April 3, 2017, 11:18:44 am »

Guys can someone spoiler tag the answer to this question please about last nights episode.

Spoiler

I see DCI Huntley had Ifields laptop and bag in the back of her car. She used swabs on his clothes then swapped the swabs and renamed the evidence bags.

What exactly did she do and what did she rename.?

I'm confused

[close]

cheers

Alan_X · « **Reply #248 on:** April 3, 2017, 11:36:44 am »

Quote from: Buck Pete on April 3, 2017, 11:18:44 am

Guys can someone spoiler tag the answer to this question please about last nights episode.

Spoiler
I see DCI Huntley had Ifields laptop and bag in the back of her car. She used swabs on his clothes then swapped the swabs and renamed the evidence bags.

What exactly did she do and what did she rename.?

I'm confused

[close]

cheers

Spoiler

the blood spatter on the edge of the table could have been hers and had her DNA. The clothes in the hold-all had Ifield's blood on them so she made a new swab with that and swapped it for the evidence bag in the fridge. But she misheard the number at the crime scene - 30 instead of 13 - so had to change it by hand in the evidence room. That's bound to come up later.

[close]

Craig S · « **Reply #249 on:** April 3, 2017, 11:38:29 am »

Quote from: Buck Pete on April 3, 2017, 11:18:44 am

Guys can someone spoiler tag the answer to this question please about last nights episode.

Spoiler
I see DCI Huntley had Ifields laptop and bag in the back of her car. She used swabs on his clothes then swapped the swabs and renamed the evidence bags.

What exactly did she do and what did she rename.?

I'm confused

[close]

cheers

Spoiler

Swapped her blood from the scene to his. She overheard this and thought it was reference something-30. KGR-30 rather than KGR-13. When she got to the cabinet she realised she had it wrong and crossed it out with her pen. No doube this will come back to haunt her. *-Those 3 first letters may be wrong.

The second one, she added to the chopped up girls evidence to put Ifields dna/blood at the scene.

[close]

Buck Pete · « **Reply #250 on:** April 3, 2017, 11:54:37 am »

Ah ok. Great cheers lads.

oldfordie · « **Reply #251 on:** April 3, 2017, 12:42:57 pm »

Quote from: Buck Pete on April 3, 2017, 11:54:37 am

Ah ok. Great cheers lads.

Spoiler

Huntely also took another sample of Tims blood and contaminated evidence to link Tim to the disappearance of another victim not yet found.

[close]

Ziltoid · « **Reply #252 on:** April 3, 2017, 01:13:36 pm »

In my opinion I don't think this guy is just going to have a bit part

Buck Pete · « **Reply #253 on:** April 3, 2017, 01:28:14 pm »

So...Am I right in assuming.

Spoiler

Taking Tim Ifield out of the equation we have 2 murders and 1 attempted murder being pinned on young Michael Farmer. Or is it 1 murder, 1 missing girl and 1 abduction?

They have only found 1 decapitated body haven't they? And the abducted girl who survived the explosion in Farmers flat.

If Huntley has planted Ifields DNA on the chopped up girl surely that will exonerate Farmer and Huntley will be discredited for locking up an innocent man?

[close]

The Gulleysucker · « **Reply #254 on:** April 3, 2017, 01:51:15 pm »

Quote from: Ziltoid on April 3, 2017, 01:13:36 pm

Spoiler

I'm not convinced yet but my wife certainly thinks it's him (why else would he have transferred from George Gently..

)and that Huntley knows/suspects it and it's all about her trying to provide cover for him.

At the moment, I think that would be far too easy and am hoping for a few more twists and turns yet.

[close]

oldfordie · « **Reply #255 on:** April 3, 2017, 01:53:53 pm »

Quote from: Buck Pete on April 3, 2017, 01:28:14 pm

So...Am I right in assuming.

Spoiler
Taking Tim Ifield out of the equation we have 2 murders and 1 attempted murder being pinned on young Michael Farmer. Or is it 1 murder, 1 missing girl and 1 abduction?

They have only found 1 decapitated body haven't they? And the abducted girl who survived the explosion in Farmers flat.

If Huntley has planted Ifields DNA on the chopped up girl surely that will exonerate Farmer and Huntley will be discredited for locking up an innocent man?
[close]

Spoiler

I think it's 1 murder, 1 missing girl they probably believe dead and 1 abduction. am confused about this,AFAIK Huntely added Tims blood to the evidence of the missing girl Leonie Collersdale. forensics showed Tims blood was found on her partial Torso but they all say shes never been found.

[close]

sinnermichael · « **Reply #256 on:** April 4, 2017, 10:58:00 pm »

Clip from episode 3.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p04yxlqn

Yiannis · « **Reply #257 on:** April 5, 2017, 11:20:51 am »

Quote from: Ziltoid on April 3, 2017, 01:13:36 pm

In my opinion I don't think this guy is just going to have a bit part

When I saw him, first thing in my mind was to wonder when The A Word is back on.

aaronaldo · « **Reply #258 on:** April 5, 2017, 04:04:38 pm »

anyone know where I can watch season 3 online? Can't find it anywhere thanks!

[You may have an iPhone but you are still using the free version of Tapatalk and spamming us with that knowledge]

sinnermichael · « **Reply #259 on:** April 5, 2017, 04:25:00 pm »

Quote from: aaronaldo on April 5, 2017, 04:04:38 pm

anyone know where I can watch season 3 online? Can't find it anywhere thanks!

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/p00yzlr0

The Gulleysucker · « **Reply #260 on:** April 9, 2017, 10:02:33 pm »

jillcwhomever · « **Reply #261 on:** April 9, 2017, 10:09:46 pm »

OMG.

Trada · « **Reply #262 on:** April 9, 2017, 10:09:49 pm »

Brilliant!!!

rob1966 · « **Reply #263 on:** April 9, 2017, 10:15:19 pm »

Kenny's Jacket · « **Reply #264 on:** April 9, 2017, 11:54:57 pm »

Amazing TV.

Spoiler

Does anyone think The husband is the balaclava man and thats why shes framing the other guy?

Does anyone think Jamie is dodgy?

[close]

Alan_X · « **Reply #265 on:** April 10, 2017, 05:21:34 am »

Quote from: Kenny's Jacket on April 9, 2017, 11:54:57 pm

Amazing TV.

Spoiler
Does anyone think The husband is the balaclava man and thats why shes framing the other guy?

Does anyone think Jamie is dodgy?
[close]

Spoilered for anyone an episode behind.

Spoiler

I think it's pretty certain that the husband is balaclava man. It would provide a motive for Huntley but she's getting in very deep. Still a lot of loose ends to tie up.

[close]

Kenny's Jacket · « **Reply #266 on:** April 10, 2017, 05:36:51 am »

Thanks Alan

Just done a search on doing spoilers and you posted this in the Inside No. 9 thread

Spoiler

then your text and then

[close]

Doesn't work for me

(I took out the spaces)

rob1966 · « **Reply #267 on:** April 10, 2017, 09:29:18 am »

Quote from: Kenny's Jacket on April 9, 2017, 11:54:57 pm

Amazing TV.

Spoiler
Does anyone think The husband is the balaclava man and thats why shes framing the other guy?

Does anyone think Jamie is dodgy?
[close]

Spoiler

Yes, the husband is balaclave man. I just had a look on iplayer and paused the lift scenes and it certainly looks like him. He looks bulkier, but the jacket over the suit would do that. Is she part of a killer couple though? She certainly had no problems killing Tim?

[close]

Ziltoid · « **Reply #268 on:** April 10, 2017, 10:10:38 am »

Absolute quality once again.

oldfordie · « **Reply #269 on:** April 11, 2017, 12:52:59 pm »

Spoiler

Everything's pointing to Nick being Balaclava man, very clever the way he went down to floor 3 to attack him as it would have been stronger evidence against him if he would have attacked Arnott on floor 5, Nick must be on CTV entering the building but there will be no CTV of him leaving if he is Balaclava man,I would have thought this would all be in the last episode, this is episode 3 so there must be a lot of twists to come. got a feeling Nicks solicitor is going to get him off the hook till episode 6

[close]

Mr Mingebag Squid · « **Reply #270 on:** April 11, 2017, 01:03:23 pm »

Spoiler

I dunno, Huntley's husband as balaclava man seems to obvious

[close]

Phil M · « **Reply #271 on:** April 11, 2017, 01:50:25 pm »

Avoiding all previous pages, haven't seen a single episode of this show, is it that good?

Ps. I couldn't get into 'Luther'.

oldfordie · « **Reply #272 on:** April 11, 2017, 01:58:55 pm »

Quote from: Mr Mingebag Squid on April 11, 2017, 01:03:23 pm

Spoiler
I dunno, Huntley's husband as balaclava man seems to obvious
[close]

Spoiler

Another explanation for having the balaclava would be that he helped clean up the mess at Tims flat and he's hiding evidence in his office but that cant be true as he asked his wife what she was doing in the time period when Tim was murdered, he thinks she maybe having an affair. it looks like it can only go 2 ways, a new can of worms is going to open up leading to another series or everyone knows Nicks Balaclava man but nobody can prove it

[close]

oldfordie · « **Reply #273 on:** April 11, 2017, 02:16:16 pm »

Quote from: Phil M on April 11, 2017, 01:50:25 pm

Avoiding all previous pages, haven't seen a single episode of this show, is it that good?

Ps. I couldn't get into 'Luther'.

Have you seen the first 3 series as they were very strong, this new series is Brilliant but story line taking time to develop.

Phil M · « **Reply #274 on:** April 11, 2017, 03:02:45 pm »

Quote from: oldfordie on April 11, 2017, 02:16:16 pm

Have you seen the first 3 series as they were very strong, this new series is Brilliant but story line taking time to develop.

No none whatsoever mate.

oldfordie · « **Reply #275 on:** April 11, 2017, 03:16:40 pm »

Quote from: Phil M on April 11, 2017, 03:02:45 pm

No none whatsoever mate.

First 3 series all connected so try and watch them first. brilliant series.

Mag Hull · « **Reply #276 on:** April 12, 2017, 01:45:10 pm »

LoD just keeps on giving

Spoiler

Is it just me or is there any significance to the call Hilton took when he was with Roz - chronologically it ties in with Steve trying to contact Nick!

[close]

Phil M · « **Reply #277 on:** April 12, 2017, 01:47:57 pm »

Quote from: oldfordie on April 11, 2017, 03:16:40 pm

First 3 series all connected so try and watch them first. brilliant series.

Will do ta.

Buck Pete · « **Reply #278 on:** April 14, 2017, 11:46:12 am »

Wow what an ending to Ep 3!!!

Spoiler

I think Mr Huntley's lawyer is going to play a big part in all this even though we haven't seen him in person yet.

The cameras zoomed in on Mr Huntleys phone contacts a coupe of times and showed the lawyers name and he was mentioned by name a few times. The have made sure this guys name is noticed by the viewer.

[close]

Jono69 · « **Reply #279 on:** April 14, 2017, 05:45:00 pm »

Alot better than last series in my opinion. Very enjoyable and plenty of twists and turns