Author Topic: Anfield naming rights worth £100m  (Read 192176 times)

Offline shanklyboy

  • OCB Enforcer.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 11,591
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #160 on: January 26, 2010, 02:53:07 pm »
Easier said then done.




Nahhhh easily done mate.

£100 each and for that, one the eve of a game we get to vote on the squad of 18....the starting 11 and and make all the tactical decisions in-game and online.

They might aswell just give us all of the trophies now!
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate, contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.

John F. Kennedy.
www.savelfc.org

Offline Mad Men

  • Been there. Done that.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 15,361
  • You never saw me. I was never here.
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #161 on: January 30, 2010, 11:26:57 pm »

Nahhhh easily done mate.

£100 each and for that, one the eve of a game we get to vote on the squad of 18....the starting 11 and and make all the tactical decisions in-game and online.

They might aswell just give us all of the trophies now!


:)
This is what we do. And we do it very well. Link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bM8gOyjeuc

Offline Yakyb

  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 534
  • Wirralien Born and Bred
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #162 on: February 1, 2010, 11:31:52 pm »
Nah not a good idea the lads up in crosby are having a pretty bad time of it



http://www.mywaterloorugby.com/

Offline shanklyboy

  • OCB Enforcer.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 11,591
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #163 on: February 2, 2010, 12:38:20 am »
Nah not a good idea the lads up in crosby are having a pretty bad time of it



http://www.mywaterloorugby.com/


Yes but that's being done by men with odd shaped balls.

Ours would be done by millions of intelligent, articulate, logical thinking experts.

Just take a look around the threads.....what more proof do you need?

Let's get it done!
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate, contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.

John F. Kennedy.
www.savelfc.org

Offline niallo27

  • I like iceburgers
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,007
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #164 on: February 9, 2010, 08:02:40 am »
Springfield did so why cant we

Duff Beer Krusty Burger Buzz Cola Costington's Department Store Kwik-E-Mart Stupid Flanders Park

Offline Robbie Styles

  • Main Stander
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
    • Robbie Styles
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #165 on: February 9, 2010, 09:19:31 am »
Springfield did so why cant we

Duff Beer Krusty Burger Buzz Cola Costington's Department Store Kwik-E-Mart Stupid Flanders Park

This reminds me of the Springfield Monorail episode
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEZjzsnPhnw
Bill Shankly - 'Some people believe football is a matter of life and death. I'm very disappointed with that attitude. I can assure you it is much, much more important than that.'

Offline The Manhattan Project

  • snood fan
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,433
  • I Have Become Death, The Destroyer Of Worlds
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #166 on: March 5, 2010, 08:37:48 am »
"AdidasLiverBowl"
china syndrome 810512640 reactor meltdown fusion element
no uniquely indefinable one 59118 identification unknown 113
source transmission 4121 general panic hysteria 02 outbreak
foreign mutation 0101505 maximum code destruction nuclear
reflection 010414 power plutonium helix atomic energy wave

Offline danwms

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,334
  • Walking through the storm.
    • Last FM
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #167 on: March 5, 2010, 11:08:55 am »
Kelloggs cereal bowl.

Offline Aristotle

  • is a bugger for the bottle. Apache tool wielder extraordinaire - especially in wardrobes. The 'Oral B' Specialist.....brushes his cavities vigorously outdoors.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,438
  • Happiness depends upon ourselves
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #168 on: March 13, 2010, 10:07:00 pm »
Only semi-related but does anyone know if there is a stadium named after a person, not in the John Lennon airport manner as in John Smith bought the rights and now the *insert name* play at the John Smith stadium?
My twitter
If Harry can get Spurs to the CL 1/4 final then he could get England to the World Cup final.

Offline shanklyboy

  • OCB Enforcer.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 11,591
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #169 on: March 14, 2010, 12:03:11 am »
Only semi-related but does anyone know if there is a stadium named after a person, not in the John Lennon airport manner as in John Smith bought the rights and now the *insert name* play at the John Smith stadium?

I suppose you could say The Madejski Stadium and The DW Stadium fall into that category to a certain extent.
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate, contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.

John F. Kennedy.
www.savelfc.org

Offline Styf

  • Lyttle Fyngers
  • Anny Roader
  • ****
  • Posts: 449
  • You can't buy atmosphere
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #170 on: March 14, 2010, 01:58:19 pm »
There are also Ferenc Puskas Stadium in Budapest and Arnold Schwarznegger Stadium in Graz.
BOUNCEBACKABILITY

Offline Chivasino

  • educated whopper
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,819
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #171 on: March 14, 2010, 05:02:44 pm »
Not based on purchased naming rights, but Santiago Bernabéu has to be the most famous.

Offline jaygraham

  • Fiction is not the same as FACT
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,993
  • LFC
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #172 on: March 28, 2010, 03:32:27 am »





Haha i like it. "Welcome to Fortress Anfield..."
It's awfully considerate of you to think of me here/ and i'm most obliged to you for making it clear/ that i'm not here

Offline lfc_col

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,386
  • And Could He Play!
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #173 on: March 28, 2010, 04:33:54 am »
Arnold Schwarznegger Stadium in Graz.

its not called that any more now called The UPC-Arena
We Won It Six Times



JFT 97

Offline Styf

  • Lyttle Fyngers
  • Anny Roader
  • ****
  • Posts: 449
  • You can't buy atmosphere
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #174 on: April 4, 2010, 07:58:21 pm »
I was at the stadium tour last week, and one of the tourguides said there would be an annoucement about the new stadium within a month.
BOUNCEBACKABILITY

Offline shanklyboy

  • OCB Enforcer.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 11,591
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #175 on: April 4, 2010, 11:55:58 pm »
I was at the stadium tour last week, and one of the tourguides said there would be an annoucement about the new stadium within a month.

It will be a 'spade in the ground within 3 years?'
The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie — deliberate, contrived and dishonest — but the myth — persistent, persuasive and unrealistic.

John F. Kennedy.
www.savelfc.org

Offline Styf

  • Lyttle Fyngers
  • Anny Roader
  • ****
  • Posts: 449
  • You can't buy atmosphere
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #176 on: April 5, 2010, 03:09:51 pm »
It will be a 'spade in the ground within 3 years?'
I don't have high expectations either.
BOUNCEBACKABILITY

Offline buchigo!

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,657
  • okay javier but i'm only on loan... for sure no?
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #177 on: April 7, 2010, 12:21:31 am »
It will be a 'spade in the ground within 3 years?'
we could have had a stadium made out of spades.
Finish the job sir. Come back when we deserve you.

Offline Uhoh AureliOs

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,655
  • Fabio!
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #178 on: April 7, 2010, 12:44:41 am »
we could have had a stadium made out of spades.

A spadium?

Offline buchigo!

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,657
  • okay javier but i'm only on loan... for sure no?
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #179 on: April 7, 2010, 10:35:37 am »
Finish the job sir. Come back when we deserve you.

Offline LiamG

  • He's loving angels instead. Cos through it all they offer him protection.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 12,160
  • Y.N.W.A
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #180 on: April 7, 2010, 10:47:50 am »
Id say our naming rights are worth more than £100million

Offline The Manhattan Project

  • snood fan
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,433
  • I Have Become Death, The Destroyer Of Worlds
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #181 on: May 5, 2010, 12:52:32 am »
I hope it's not called the "GO COMPARE Stadium"
china syndrome 810512640 reactor meltdown fusion element
no uniquely indefinable one 59118 identification unknown 113
source transmission 4121 general panic hysteria 02 outbreak
foreign mutation 0101505 maximum code destruction nuclear
reflection 010414 power plutonium helix atomic energy wave

Offline xerxes1

  • Arch Revisionist. Lord Marmaduke of Bunkerton. Has no agenda other than the truth. Descendant of Prince John.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 10,434
  • L-I-V,E-R-P-,double OL, Liverpool FC.
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #182 on: February 11, 2011, 08:19:50 pm »
Interesting to see that both West ham and Spurs, who are currently VERY much in themarket see the value of naming rights for the OS at around £150m.
In brand awareness terms Liverpool will trump that which colours the new stadium debate signiifcantly.
"I've never felt being in a minority of one was in any way an indication that I might be in error"

Offline Peter McGurk

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,821
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #183 on: February 11, 2011, 09:17:05 pm »
Interesting to see that both West ham and Spurs, who are currently VERY much in themarket see the value of naming rights for the OS at around £150m.
In brand awareness terms Liverpool will trump that which colours the new stadium debate signiifcantly.

It would be interesting to know how they work that out:

Sydney (renamed ANZ Arena 2007) A$31.5 Million over 7 years
Athens.  Err, nil?
Bejing. Nil also?

Of course if it were true and West Ham put it all into the stadium, I wonder why they would still need to borrow £40m from the local council...?

The headline (Daily Mail online) is '...West Ham target £150m naming rights deal'.  I can target a life of idleness and luxury but it doesn't get me any closer to it.


And...


Stadium Name
Sponsor
Home Teams
Avg. $/Year
Expires


Air Canada Centre
Air Canada
Toronto Maple Leafs, Raptors
$1.5 million
2019

Alltel Stadium
Alltel Corp.
Jacksonville Jaguars
$620,000
2007

American Airlines Arena
American Airlines
Miami Heat
$2.1 million
2019

American Airlines Center
American Airlines
Dallas Mavericks, Stars
$6.5 million
2031

America West Arena
America West
Phoenix Suns, Coyotes, Mercury
$866,667
2019

Ameriquest Field
Ameriquest Capital Corp.
Texas Rangers
$2.5 million
2034

Arco Arena
Atlantic Richfield
Sacramento Kings, Monarchs
$750,000
2007

Bank of America Stadium
Bank of America
Carolina Panthers
$7 million
2024....

[enough naming rights already]

I can see it now... "The Half-Empty Newham Council Olympic Football and Athletics Bowl 2012" - worth every penny

« Last Edit: February 11, 2011, 09:31:50 pm by Peter McGurk »

Offline xerxes1

  • Arch Revisionist. Lord Marmaduke of Bunkerton. Has no agenda other than the truth. Descendant of Prince John.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 10,434
  • L-I-V,E-R-P-,double OL, Liverpool FC.
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #184 on: February 11, 2011, 10:44:08 pm »
The current record naming rights deal is a tie at $400m.

Who says that West Ham would still need to borrow any sum at this stage? Construction / redevelopment costs will be needed upfront, naming rights are typically paid over the duration of a sponsorship, it is easy to see how upfront expenditure may need to be borrowed.

The symmetry you draw between LFC and the Toronto Maple Leafs Raptors suggests that brand marketing is best left to others................ ;)
« Last Edit: February 15, 2011, 11:29:36 pm by xerxes1 »
"I've never felt being in a minority of one was in any way an indication that I might be in error"

Offline Peter McGurk

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,821
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #185 on: February 15, 2011, 11:04:29 pm »
The current record naming rights deal is a tie at $400m.

Who says that West Ham would still need to borrow any sum at this stage? Construction / redevelopment costs will be needed upfront, naming rights are typically paid over the duration of a sponsorship, it is easy to see how upfront expenditure may need to be borrowed.

The symetry you draw between LFC and the Toronto Maple Leafs Raptors suggests that brand marketing is best left to others................ ;)

I assume you are referring to the report of AEG's proposed LA Event Center (sic) an unsigned 'deal' and of pretty little relevance to Olympic stadium naming rights taken over by a struggling English Premier League team.  You choose to ignore the actual recent historic valuations, presumably they don't suit your argument.  I could have posted the whole list of current deals but as I said, enough said.

Incidentally, symmetry normally refers to a question of balance or more plainly, mirror image.  The word I think you were looking for is 'parallel'.  Be careful of the big words - they can bite.

« Last Edit: February 15, 2011, 11:26:06 pm by Peter McGurk »

Offline xerxes1

  • Arch Revisionist. Lord Marmaduke of Bunkerton. Has no agenda other than the truth. Descendant of Prince John.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 10,434
  • L-I-V,E-R-P-,double OL, Liverpool FC.
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #186 on: February 15, 2011, 11:34:49 pm »
I assume you are referring to the report of AEG's proposed LA Event Center (sic) an unsigned 'deal' and of pretty little relevance to Olympic stadium naming rights taken over by a struggling English Premier League team.  You choose to ignore the actual recent historic valuations, presumably they don't suit your argument.  I could have posted the whole list of current deals but as I said, enough said.

Incidentally, symmetry normally refers to a question of balance or more plainly, mirror image.  The word I think you were looking for is 'parallel'.  Be careful of the big words - they can bite.

I ignore nothing. The world record stadium naming rights deals stand at $400m,the rest are lower, fact. Where you choose to pitch our prospects is entirely up to you.

I used the word symmetry because that is what I meant, there is no parallel betwen the two examples.
"I've never felt being in a minority of one was in any way an indication that I might be in error"

Offline Peter McGurk

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,821
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #187 on: February 15, 2011, 11:52:16 pm »
I ignore nothing. The world record stadium naming rights deals stand at $400m,the rest are lower, fact. Where you choose to pitch our prospects is entirely up to you.

I used the word symmetry because that is what I meant, there is no parallel betwen the two examples.

I have compared the historic value of naming rights for an Olympic stadium to that of a 'boast' that West Ham have reportedly targetted for the same thing.  I made no reference to LFC and I fail to see what 'symmetry' I could have drawn between the club and anyone on the list of recent naming rights deals.

If symmetry was the word you meant to use perhaps you might explain its usage in the commonly accepted sense of the word (displaying a harmonious beauty or balance)?


Offline xerxes1

  • Arch Revisionist. Lord Marmaduke of Bunkerton. Has no agenda other than the truth. Descendant of Prince John.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 10,434
  • L-I-V,E-R-P-,double OL, Liverpool FC.
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #188 on: February 16, 2011, 12:14:13 pm »
I have compared the historic value of naming rights for an Olympic stadium to that of a 'boast' that West Ham have reportedly targetted for the same thing.  I made no reference to LFC and I fail to see what 'symmetry' I could have drawn between the club and anyone on the list of recent naming rights deals.

If symmetry was the word you meant to use perhaps you might explain its usage in the commonly accepted sense of the word (displaying a harmonious beauty or balance)?
You quote historic naming rights, the record for which is $400m. You are right not to look backwards at past deals when we are anticipating what might be achieved.

I meant what I said.


"I've never felt being in a minority of one was in any way an indication that I might be in error"

Offline stewy17

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,600
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #189 on: February 16, 2011, 01:47:24 pm »
It would be interesting to know how they work that out:

Sydney (renamed ANZ Arena 2007) A$31.5 Million over 7 years
Athens.  Err, nil?
Bejing. Nil also?

Of course if it were true and West Ham put it all into the stadium, I wonder why they would still need to borrow £40m from the local council...?

The headline (Daily Mail online) is '...West Ham target £150m naming rights deal'.  I can target a life of idleness and luxury but it doesn't get me any closer to it.


And...


Stadium Name
Sponsor
Home Teams
Avg. $/Year
Expires


Air Canada Centre
Air Canada
Toronto Maple Leafs, Raptors
$1.5 million
2019

Alltel Stadium
Alltel Corp.
Jacksonville Jaguars
$620,000
2007

American Airlines Arena
American Airlines
Miami Heat
$2.1 million
2019

American Airlines Center
American Airlines
Dallas Mavericks, Stars
$6.5 million
2031

America West Arena
America West
Phoenix Suns, Coyotes, Mercury
$866,667
2019

Ameriquest Field
Ameriquest Capital Corp.
Texas Rangers
$2.5 million
2034

Arco Arena
Atlantic Richfield
Sacramento Kings, Monarchs
$750,000
2007

Bank of America Stadium
Bank of America
Carolina Panthers
$7 million
2024....

[enough naming rights already]

I can see it now... "The Half-Empty Newham Council Olympic Football and Athletics Bowl 2012" - worth every penny



Any chance of telling us how much was paid for the Emirates and Allianz Arena? They would be a much better comparison seeing as Arsenal and Bayern are football teams of a similar reputation to us.

Quoting American stadiums (at a yearly premium) isn't really helpful at all, completely different market.

Offline stewy17

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,600
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #190 on: February 16, 2011, 01:57:13 pm »
Arsenal got 100 million for 15 years from Emirates.

Not bad going at all that.

Offline Peter McGurk

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,821
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #191 on: February 16, 2011, 02:58:05 pm »
You quote historic naming rights, the record for which is $400m. You are right not to look backwards at past deals when we are anticipating what might be achieved.

I meant what I said.

I don't think you know what you said.


Offline Peter McGurk

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,821
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #192 on: February 16, 2011, 02:58:48 pm »
Any chance of telling us how much was paid for the Emirates and Allianz Arena? They would be a much better comparison seeing as Arsenal and Bayern are football teams of a similar reputation to us.

Quoting American stadiums (at a yearly premium) isn't really helpful at all, completely different market.

I agree, but the $400m referred to naming rights in the US.  As you say, it has no relevance at all.

The Emirates deal was about £3.4m for 15 years, the rest was their shirt deal. The Allianz Arena is about £4m a year.

From PWC...
What’s in a name? Businesses take sports stadiums seriously
...Recent high profile stadium naming rights deals in Europe include Bayern Munich’s Allianz Arena at USD$8 million (£4 million) a year, and a total sponsorship package at Arsenal’s Emirate’s Stadium, which includes both the stadium naming rights over fifteen years and the shirt sponsorship for eight years, worth USD$200 million (£100 million). Julie Clark, leisure sector leader at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP commented: “When you consider the relative size of the UK and German sports markets at $7.5 billion and $8.5 billion respectively, compared with the US at $49 billion, it puts the naming rights deals done in Europe in perspective..."

...perspective - now there's a good idea.




« Last Edit: February 16, 2011, 03:14:32 pm by Peter McGurk »

Offline Acaustiq

  • Statistically the biggest dick waver and has quotes to prove it. Bitter revisionist.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,092
  • Finally, Danone Actimel cured him.
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #193 on: February 16, 2011, 03:18:46 pm »
Arsenal got 100 million for 15 years from Emirates.

Not bad going at all that.

It's fucking awful, that's a combined deal.

We're getting what, £20m just off the shirt?
When your Mum used to pick you up from school and you'd run out and be like 'Mummy I got 9/10 in the spelling test today', would she go 'phenomenal, son'.

Cos if she did she's a stupid fuck.

Offline west_london_red

  • Knows his stuff - pull the udder one! RAWK's Dairy Queen.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 21,907
  • watching me? but whose watching you watching me?
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #194 on: February 16, 2011, 03:55:20 pm »

From PWC...
What’s in a name? Businesses take sports stadiums seriously
...Recent high profile stadium naming rights deals in Europe include Bayern Munich’s Allianz Arena at USD$8 million (£4 million) a year, and a total sponsorship package at Arsenal’s Emirate’s Stadium, which includes both the stadium naming rights over fifteen years and the shirt sponsorship for eight years, worth USD$200 million (£100 million). Julie Clark, leisure sector leader at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP commented: “When you consider the relative size of the UK and German sports markets at $7.5 billion and $8.5 billion respectively, compared with the US at $49 billion, it puts the naming rights deals done in Europe in perspective..."

...perspective - now there's a good idea.


If you want to talk about perspective how about the fact that the US has a population about 5 times greater then the UK... hence its sports market is obviously going to be larger in the US.
Thinking is overrated.
The mind is a tool, it's not meant to be used that much.
Rest, love, observe. Laugh.

Offline west_london_red

  • Knows his stuff - pull the udder one! RAWK's Dairy Queen.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 21,907
  • watching me? but whose watching you watching me?
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #195 on: February 16, 2011, 03:57:46 pm »
It's fucking awful, that's a combined deal.

We're getting what, £20m just off the shirt?

I think the key thing was that they got a lot of the money upfront to help pay for the stadiums construction costs, and I dont think theres that long of the shirt sponsorship left so expect them to come in closer to the £20 million we get and have a shinny (relativly) new stadium to boot.
Thinking is overrated.
The mind is a tool, it's not meant to be used that much.
Rest, love, observe. Laugh.

Offline stewy17

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,600
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #196 on: February 16, 2011, 04:42:44 pm »
Cool, so we want about £10 million a year for 10 years??

I'm on it, I'll just go and tweet J W Henry...

Offline Peter McGurk

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,821
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #197 on: February 16, 2011, 07:40:31 pm »
If you want to talk about perspective how about the fact that the US has a population about 5 times greater then the UK... hence its sports market is obviously going to be larger in the US.

Yes and the value of the sports market is 5 times bigger too.  To base the value of naming rights on the US market is ‘optimistic in the extreme’ or just plain bloody bonkers.

I think the key thing was that they got a lot of the money upfront to help pay for the stadiums construction costs, and I dont think theres that long of the shirt sponsorship left so expect them to come in closer to the £20 million we get and have a shinny (relativly) new stadium to boot.

This thread is really pretty pointless in any event.  As I understand it, the outcome of that argument is that we would have to spend £200m more to build a shiny, new stadium that would bring in about £60m of naming rights if we were lucky.  That’s such an absolutely marvelous, brilliant, stupendous and earth-shattering idea - somebody'd better tweet that!

« Last Edit: February 16, 2011, 07:45:20 pm by Peter McGurk »

Offline west_london_red

  • Knows his stuff - pull the udder one! RAWK's Dairy Queen.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 21,907
  • watching me? but whose watching you watching me?
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #198 on: February 16, 2011, 08:09:40 pm »

This thread is really pretty pointless in any event.  As I understand it, the outcome of that argument is that we would have to spend £200m more to build a shiny, new stadium that would bring in about £60m of naming rights if we were lucky.  That’s such an absolutely marvelous, brilliant, stupendous and earth-shattering idea - somebody'd better tweet that!

No the thread is not pointless, trying to use reason with someone who refuses to point blank consider other ideas then there own is pointless.
Thinking is overrated.
The mind is a tool, it's not meant to be used that much.
Rest, love, observe. Laugh.

Offline Peter McGurk

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,821
Re: Anfield naming rights worth £100m
« Reply #199 on: February 16, 2011, 08:21:57 pm »
No the thread is not pointless, trying to use reason with someone who refuses to point blank consider other ideas then there own is pointless.

Quite so.