We'd have needed 50 points from the last 19 games (i.e. dropped just 7 points in half a season) to equal Chelsea's points total.
If we'd replicated our 1st half of the season results for the 2nd half of the season then we'd have come 3rd (on GD).
I've seen a few people state they are disappointed with the season or looking back think we could have achieved more. We got 33 points in the last 19 games. So obviously we could have done better. Realistically though we would have need to have been out of this world to finish top. We'd have had to be very, very good to get 2nd. We probably should/could have come 3rd. The difference between 3rd and 4th is tangible if you win the CL play off.
We should have done better in the cups. Southampton was a big opportunity missed. FA Cup we should have gone further.
There's a very mild sense of regret that is washed away by the positive results over the last 2-3 months and the knowledge that we have CL football to attract players but also to look forward to watching next season.
People giving the season a score 5/10. Fuck me.
Yeah, I think we would've needed to spend some silly money in january to get to the title ahead of chelsea. In the grand scheme of things going forward we got exactly what we set out for at the start of the season, give or take a qualifier. But i think putting too much of a gloss on it and not paying close enough attention to that absolutely miserable run of form in january and february when we pretty much knew our thin squad was going to be put to the test and yet did nothing about it, would be a bit lazy. We pretty much looked at the squad, looked at the fixtures and bet that we'd be able to cope and while ultimately we were right- it was very very close, way to close for comfort. The season isn't a marathon- marathons don't have intervals and there's no option to give yourself an energy boost. It's a lot more like two races.
My criticism isn't that we didn't try harder to win the league; I don't think we could've without Chelsea suffering a dip in form at some point (and we know that didn't happen). It's that we took a risk with our squad size, and some questionable team selections and tactics, that BARELY paid off. It really shouldn't have been that close. Even if all we did was buy a centreback in January, would we have beaten Crystal Palace and Swansea at home? Klopp gets a lot of credit for doing a lot of things very very right, but a few things could've been a lot better. Having the best record against the top 6, this top 6 as well, is nothing to scoff at.
But at the other end there's questions like:
Were we a Mane injury in the first half of the season away from getting 33 points int he first half of the season as well?
How the hell did we fail to score a single goal against Southampton in 6 bloody hours of football?
Why in God's green earth were we so slow to get going against Leicester?
There are some big issues we need to sort out over the summer if we're going to compete for the League and make it to the latter stages of the CL. I'd rate the first half of the season a 9 and the second half a 5- so a 7 overall.