Is there are reason you’re comparing a 43’ to two 48’ TVs?
What will you be connecting to the TV? Soundbar/Amp, BluRay player, games console, Sky/BT etc? The LG has the most future proofed HDMI connections with all of them at 2.1, but depending on what you’re hooking up and how up to date those items are this may or may not be important.
The LG and the Sony are capable of handling Dolby Atmos and Dolby Vision but not HDR10+, the Samsung is the opposite.
It’s what are the most important features/capabilities to you really? Out of the more expensive two I’d probably side with the LG as it has the better HDMI connections despite being a few hundred cheaper. Again though depends what you’re hooking up. You might need to upgrade your current HDMI leads depending what spec they are.
Thanks for the info.
Comparing the 43 and 48 because currently we have a 32. Whilst that is small for the living room, we’re a bit hesitant of going for something too big since can’t really tell how it’ll look till it gets in there. 43 is safer but we saw the oleds in the store and thought they looked fantastic, and the smallest they are on is 48 atm.
In terms of connections won’t be any, just the streaming services through the TV. At the moment not thinking of getting a sound bar, but if the tv sound feels off then would go for it, though the Sony has a cool sound system it seems.
Just did a quick search on Dolby/hdr. Is one better than the other? Seems Netflix uses the former.
Will mainly be using it for movies, sports, streaming... Siding with the cheaper Samsung one atm since not sure our usage warrants one of the more expensive ones, but the picture on the OLEDs is amazing so may go to an outlet that has both screens so we can compare before deciding. If we do go for the more expensive ones it’ll prob be the LG, the sales guy said as you have it’s more future proof, though it’s lack of uk catch up apps is a letdown.
