Don't disagree with most of the sentiment. Doesn't stop questions getting asked about motives and performance at the club. After the ownership issues we have had there is bound to be a more critical edge about how any owners are viewed. And whilst most people would concur that we need to do things differently to this season's top 4, the reality is we need do things BETTER. Better than we have in the past. Better than the opposition. Better than the competitors. And whilst patience should be awatchword it is pointless if we do not recognise that. Patience would not have helped when H&G or Hodgson, so it is not a catchall.
I agree with more or less all of this. The point I was trying to get across was that, whilst being patiently accepting of whatever the club does is indeed a shithouse stance, patience is a strength we are going to need to display all the same. I just don't think we have it in us to allow for a football team to grow, with all the two steps forward, one step back involved. I believe that will be the same whatever the regime and it will kill us - as I say, I think the issue is actually bigger than Rodgers alone.
You mention a more critical edge to the support and I'm all for that but the reactions of large sections of Liverpool fans to every single thing the club does is anything but critical. It is mostly hysterical, overly negative and agenda driven. That's displayed in the reactions towards Rodgers, new signings, every decision FSG make/ don't make, and even our current players (see the Hanging Judge crowd's reactions to Sterling since the transfer impasse at Christmas, Mignolet having his kicks jeered). It will be the same whatever the regime if there isn't instant and sustained success and, taking everything into consideration, I don't think instant success is likely.
