is this thread purely set up to bash the manager of liverpool fc?
hodgson inherited a squad that could only finish 7th last season. on top of that, 3 of that squad (mascherano, benayoun, riera) were already on their way out of the door before hodgson could have his 1st competitive game, further weakening that 7th placed squad.
in roys only transfer window, he was give a negative transfer spend
wouldn't it be fair if we gave our new manager 1 full season in charge and then judged him at the end of the season and see whether he can improve on our 7th place finish of last season, despite that negative transfer spend?
if roy could improve on 7th, despite a negative transfer spend, and despite our own fans not backing or supporting him, then surely he will have proved his worth?
If I remember correctly, Hodgson was in consultation with the club re the purchase of Joe Cole, so if he felt strongly about Riera and Benayoun, leaving he could have put his foot down.
Mascherano left long after he had a chance to work with Roy close up.
The team he inherited finished the negative spend previous season with a very disappointing 63 points. He's added, or agreed to the adding of, Cole, Raul, Poulsen, and Konchesky and the removal of Insua and Aquilani.
He's able to play his strongest, rested, team in the premiership as he doesn't need to worry about playing in the champions league mid week. He should be smashing that 63 point haul. Instead we have a negative goal difference at Christmas.
He came to the club claiming that he didn't need to spend as he can get the existing players performing better (Definitely hasn't worked with the forward line).
If a babysitter came in and laid a kid face down in the bathwater, I'd not be inclined to give her the whole 5hrs before asking her to move on.