Whats with the patronising tone?
You know ive watched him,as ive pointed out,yet you tell me ''Thats because'' like you know yourself he hasnt been impressive,by explaining in your own words why he hasnt been impressive.You then bang on about how the teams he plays for play like ive come to the conclusion he isnt that impressive by not watching a single minute of him play.Then,telling me aboot Rawks opinion like ive mentioned anything at all aboot Deschamps.
Fucking bizarre
There wasn't any patronizing tone there. You're reading more into that post than what it was meant to be. I'm aware that you have watched him, should be fairly obvious to me you have come to your opinion, and I have not said otherwise, have I?
I said 'that's because' because I do acknowledge that he wasn't impressive for France in the last World Cup at least, well I shouldn't? I'm just saying that there are valid reasons as to why he didn't stand out. People bring out points doesn't mean they're implying the other person hasn't watched anything, it's just that they mean they're watching it differently. There's nothing wrong with that?
I brought in Deschamps, because his system is not a lot more attacking than Simeone's, so it's not as if he has played in free-flowing systems and has failed to shine. It's just a point. I mentioned RAWK, because right here in this forum people have called Deschamps as a defensive minded manager, not far away from Simeone in that regard. You said this
He doesnt seem any different a player in that set up than he is for Atleti.
That makes Deschamps and France's style of play quite relevant to the discussion, because you brought out set-up, that made it look like he was playing for an attacking set-up and still looked the same, which isn't the case. In any case, he did win the best player of Euro 2016, so it's not like he never shone for France, again a valid point in this discussion.
There's nothing bizarre there, it's just an explanation of a contrary opinion. You're known to be lighter than this, come on.
