Author Topic: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS  (Read 86411 times)

Offline Trada

  • Fully paid up member of the JC cult. Ex-Tory boy. Corbyn's Chief Hagiographer. Sometimes hasn't got a kloop.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 22,821
  • Trada
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #320 on: February 13, 2016, 03:29:10 pm »
They have more autonomy over health services, so the fuckweasel has less influence there....

Which I suspect explains it...

Yes they came to an agreement with their doctors.
Don't blame me I voted for Jeremy Corbyn!!

Miss you Tracy more and more every day xxx

“I carry them with me: what they would have thought and said and done. Make them a part of who I am. So even though they’re gone from the world they’re never gone from me.

Offline Red Beret

  • Yellow Beret. Wants to sit in the Lobster Pot. Fat-fingered. Key. Boa. Rd. Kille. R. tonunlick! Soggy Knickers King. Bed-Exiting / Grunting / Bending Down / Cum Face Champion 2023.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 51,709
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #321 on: February 13, 2016, 04:12:38 pm »
more than 207k now.  And given this is the SECOND such petition against him I'd say there's a fair bit of pressure on this issue now.
I don't always visit Lobster Pot.  But when I do. I sit.

Popcorn's Art

Offline Guz-kop

  • Baz cop
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,487
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #322 on: February 13, 2016, 04:25:55 pm »
I was looking at it last night before it hit the 100k mark. Wales, NI & Scotland are rather letting the side down.

New contract doesn't affect them.
It's wonderful, it's marvellous, it's 3-3

Offline Trada

  • Fully paid up member of the JC cult. Ex-Tory boy. Corbyn's Chief Hagiographer. Sometimes hasn't got a kloop.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 22,821
  • Trada
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #323 on: February 13, 2016, 07:45:33 pm »
I get the feeling thats what he wants the running down of the NHS. And I hate the fucking we have a mandate on 20 odd %.

Passing the blame onto the voters


Royal College of GPs warns Jeremy C*nt's new contract will starve the NHS of doctors
The professional body says recruitment will become significantly more difficult

The new contract being forced on junior doctors by the Government will make it difficult for the NHS to recruit enough doctors, GPs’ professional body has warned.

The Royal College of GPs, the membership body for family doctors which oversees aspects of their training and clinical standards, said it was “shocked and dismayed” at the decision to press ahead with the changes.

Dr Maureen Baker, chair of the Royal College, warned that the move would damage morale and lead to medical students deciding not to pursue their studies.

“The imposition of the contract will undoubtedly impair our efforts to recruit thousands of additional doctors into the NHS over the coming years in order to keep the health service sustainable – as many medical students are seeing this turmoil, not liking what they see, and turning away from medicine in the UK altogether,” she said.

“Doctors choose medicine because they genuinely want to care for their patients and contribute to the health service. It is evident that junior doctors do not think the proposed contract will allow them to do this. The College will continue to support our junior doctors.”

The warning from the Royal College is a particular blow to the Government because the ministers have said they want more care to be delivered by GPs rather than in hospitals.

Doctors pay £9,000 a year for their university degrees and complete around six years of studies, racking up huge amounts of debt in the process.

After graduation they continue compulsory foundation training in NHS hospitals, albeit on a paid basis.

A survey reported by the Independent on Wednesday found that around 90 per cent of junior doctors were considering quitting upon the imposition of the contract.

Jeremy C*nt, the Health Secretary, told the House of Commons on Thursday that he had the backing of NHS bosses to impose the new contract.

The British Medical Association, which has been negotiating the contract with officials, meanwhile said it would consider “all options open to us” to stop the contract.

The new terms of employment re-define anti-social hours and make it cheaper for hospitals to roster doctors on weekends and evenings.

The Government says this will improve care at weekends and in evenings but junior doctors worry that it will affect patient safety by encouraging unsafe shift patterns, and also that doctors who work the very longest hours will lose out financially.

Mr Hunt says the Conservatives have a mandate from their manifesto commitments on the health service to make the change. The Tory manifesto made reference to creating a so-called "seven-day NHS" which Mr Hunt says the old contract is disrupting.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/royal-college-of-gps-warns-jeremy-hunts-new-contract-will-starve-the-nhs-of-doctors-a6867646.html
« Last Edit: February 13, 2016, 08:49:10 pm by Trada »
Don't blame me I voted for Jeremy Corbyn!!

Miss you Tracy more and more every day xxx

“I carry them with me: what they would have thought and said and done. Make them a part of who I am. So even though they’re gone from the world they’re never gone from me.

Offline Wilmo

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,219
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #324 on: February 13, 2016, 08:43:43 pm »
Just checked it and it was reaching 230,000 signatures. It's open to sign until August of this year.

There was a petition not too long ago with the same sentiment that reached 250,000. Reckon this'll smash that.
'History has always shown that when we stay together we can sort out problems. When we split then we start fighting. There was not one time in history where division creates success.' - Klopp

Offline spen71

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,280
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #325 on: February 13, 2016, 09:23:57 pm »
I do not work In the NHS but realise that this is a fight everyone must make.   I've joined the Labour Party and now waiting for them to tell me dates of meetings.    I implore everyone to do the same!!

Online macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,236
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #326 on: February 15, 2016, 10:50:44 am »
http://www.buzzfeed.com/solomonhughes/nhs-contract-stoke#.nqODXgJGxK

NHS Contract Awarded To Private Firm Despite Rival Bid Being “£7 Million Cheaper”
Private company Alliance Medical beat an NHS bid to win a contract to provide cancer scan services across the North West of England. Conservative MP Malcolm Rifkind sits on the board of the private bidder.
 
PA Wire/Press Association Images Chris Radburn
Detail of the National Health Service sign at Addenbrooke's hospital in Cambridge.
An £80 million contract to run cancer scans for the NHS has been given to a private health firm with a Tory MP on their board, despite a rival NHS consortium allegedly offering to carry out the work for £7 million less.
The NHS Trust that runs Royal Stoke University Hospital in Staffordshire put together a consortium with other NHS hospitals to enter what they called a "competitive bid" for a 10-year contract to run scans across Cheshire, Staffordshire, Shropshire, Liverpool, and Lancashire. The scans, known as PET-CT, are mostly used for diagnosing and measuring cancers, and are a vital tool for fighting the disease.

However, NHS England, the "head office" of the health service, rejected the bid from state-run providers and instead awarded the contract to Alliance Medical, a private health firm whose board members include leading Conservative MP Malcolm Rifkind.

The NHS consortium is now challenging the decision to hand the contract to the private company. In January, managers from Staffordshire and Stoke NHS Trust told a public meeting that they believe their bid is £7 million cheaper than the deal agreed with the private company and "have now launched a formal challenge", according to the Stoke Sentinel.

The decision to award the contract to Alliance Medical was made earlier this month by NHS England, the body set up by the coalition government to oversee the health service.
A special department of NHS England called the Strategic Projects Team was in charge of the procurement for this scanning contract. This team was founded in 2009 to handle the management of Hinchingbrooke hospital in Cambridgeshire, which then led to the first full privatisation of an NHS hospital. That privatisation deal failed earlier this month when the healthcare firm involved, Circle, announced it was abandoning the hospital after a damning report from quality inspectors.

The individual who led the Strategic Projects Team, Ernie Buckley, was named as the contact on procurement documents for the Stoke scanning contract. He was previously a project manager for privatisation specialist Serco.

Ian Syme, coordinator of North Staffordshire Healthwatch and a long-time critic of privatisation, uncovered the original NHS bid by, in his words, "digging through 150 pages of board papers". His research revealed that the bid from the private provider had beaten the NHS bid.

Syme told BuzzFeed News: "There's little or no openness or transparency in these tendering processes, no public debate, no meaningful public scrutiny. Ask for details and you get obstructed by the 'commercial confidentiality' excuse."

He added: "The evidence is stacking up that NHS England have a privatisation agenda and NHS England are at the moment privatising NHS by stealth."

Asked about the contract win, a spokesperson for Alliance Medical said "the process has been open and transparent from day one" and that the company is "delighted to be successful" in winning the contract. Alliance Medical also highlighted its existing work for the NHS in the North West.

Conservative MP Malcolm Rifkind gets around £60,000 a year to sit on Alliance Medical’s board, according to public records.
He is a prominent backbencher in a government whose health policy is now enriching his own company. Alliance Medical has a turnover of around £120 million a year, so this scanning contract, worth an estimated £8million a year, is a significant part of its work. Alliance Medical said Rifkind was not involved in the bid.

Stoke Hospital intended to use a £3 million scanner – bought in November 2013 with donations from Keele University and members of the public – if it won the contract. Local campaigners believe the scanner might either remain unused or be brought into the private Alliance Medical's scheme.

When asked why it had apparently chosen a more expensive bid from a private company for the scanning contract, NHS England told BuzzFeed News: "NHS England is currently running a procurement process to ensure people who require medical imaging continue to receive a high quality sustainable service.

"We are working with all parties to try to reach an agreement that is in the best interest of patients and allows continued use of the charity-funded scanner at the Royal Stoke University Hospital."
« Last Edit: February 15, 2016, 10:53:25 am by macca007 »

Offline Red Beret

  • Yellow Beret. Wants to sit in the Lobster Pot. Fat-fingered. Key. Boa. Rd. Kille. R. tonunlick! Soggy Knickers King. Bed-Exiting / Grunting / Bending Down / Cum Face Champion 2023.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 51,709
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #327 on: February 15, 2016, 11:01:55 am »
Petition is now almost 280k
I don't always visit Lobster Pot.  But when I do. I sit.

Popcorn's Art

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,794
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #328 on: February 15, 2016, 08:08:09 pm »
http://www.thecanary.co/2016/02/08/cameron-just-launched-privatisation-surge-end-nhs-time-leaves-office/

Cameron just launched a privatisation ‘surge’ to end the NHS by the time he leaves office

A huge increase in the number of NHS contracts handed out to private firms has led to concerns the UK may be heading towards a costly, insurance-based healthcare system like that in the US.

The Health and Social Care Act 2012 completely changed the English NHS system. It means that:

The Health Secretary is no longer responsible for the NHS due to a “hands-off” clause which gives power to commissioning groups. This means, as 38 Degrees has said, “the responsibility for securing the provision of healthcare services will lie with unelected commissioners who will only be accountable to an unelected national quango”.
The strategic centres of the NHS, such as Strategic Health Authorities and Primary Healthcare Trusts, were dismantled. This effectively denationalised the service, removing the economies of scale and guarantees of standardised service regardless of where you live in the country.
This paved the way to ensure that up to 49% of beds in any NHS hospital can be handed over to private providers.
And now, The Guardian has reported that these changes mean more than a third of contracts put out to tender have gone to private healthcare firms. This is despite the fact that contracts taken up by private firms in recent years have failed miserably.

Failures of Tory privatisation

The very first NHS hospital, Hinchingbrooke, to be run by a private firm, Circle, was declared “inadequate” and their contract cancelled. This was extremely damaging for a government that has been so desperate to increase the number of hospitals run by private firms. Circle was accused of:

poor emotional and physical care which was not safe or caring…people were not treated with dignity and respect… some patients were afraid of certain nursing staff
Patients were even told, “don’t misbehave, you know what happens when you misbehave”. Junior doctors even marked patients as “do not resuscitate”, without speaking to the families of the patients or consulting senior clinicians.

While these firms may be able to cut costs, they do this at the expense of quality care, putting lives in danger. The disasters of this privatisation, that promised “unprecedented” savings, did not stop more private firms getting involved in running NHS services.

Serco took on a 3-year contract worth £140m to run community health services in Suffolk. Before Serco landed the contract, the four-hour response targets for nurses and therapists to meet patients was achieved 97% of the time (the target is 95%). However, in November 2013 Serco only managed 89.3%, leading to concerns about the services that they were providing.

Also, bus operator Arriva gained a contract worth £66.8m in 2013. But, due to the fact that they provided  incorrect information indicating a higher performance than they actually achieved, Arriva lost their contract.

These failures of privatisation in the NHS have not put the government off their privatisation initiative, nor put firms off seeking to take over the NHS. Dave Prentis, from the biggest health union, Unison said:

There is no evidence to suggest the private sector does health any better than the NHS. Even such monumental failures as Hinchingbrooke have done little to dampen the government’s zeal for the market.
The UK will soon have a healthcare system like the US

Prentis also warned that our free NHS healthcare system could soon be replaced by a US-style system, where you receive health care only if you can afford the extortionate fees:

The public wants well-run, efficient health services. They are not so keen on private firms putting shareholders and profits before patients. And they are increasingly nervous that ability to pay could soon count for more than someone’s need for help.
Worryingly, many firms from the US are seeking to buy NHS services and have not been discouraged by the failures of private firms in the NHS.

Vernon Baxter from Health Investor magazine asserted that:

The US market has been heavily invested into and there is a scarcity of assets … [the major US companies] have bought everything in North America and now American capital is looking at buying a lot of the assets in the UK and western Europe.
Government links to private healthcare firms

Andrew Lansley, the former Health Secretary, who drafted the Health and Social Care Act 2012, has benefited hugely from his reforms. He has earned money advising private firms on these very reforms, which the government has tried to cover-up.

Moreover, many peers and MPs that pushed the Act through parliament have vested interests in seeing private healthcare firms succeed. A staggering number (too many to list) have shares in private healthcare firms and receive regular payments from such firms. Among them are George Gideon Oliver Osborne, son of Sir Peter Osborne, 17th Baronet of Ballentaylor and Ballylemon and Felicity Alexandra Loxton-Peacock, educated at St. Paul's and Magdalen College, Oxford and David Cameron, who have received donations from those benefiting from the Conservative government’s reforms. Unsurprisingly, shareholders from the disgraced firm Circle have donated large sums to the Conservative party.

The increasingly easy way that private healthcare firms can buy up NHS contracts- with nearly 40% of new contract now taken up by private firms- suggests that, bit by bit, the NHS is being sold to corporations who seek to put profit before people. Our elected officials have close links to the individuals who benefit directly from NHS reforms our politicians are pushing through.
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,794
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #329 on: February 15, 2016, 08:08:33 pm »
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Online TepidT2O

  • Deffo NOT 9"! MUFC bedwetter. Grass. Folically-challenged, God-piece-wearing, monkey-rubber. Jizz aroma expert. Operating at the lower end of the distribution curve...has the hots for Alan. Bastard. Fearless in transfer windows with lack of convicti
  • Lead Matchday Commentator
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 94,548
  • Dejan Lovren fan club member #1
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #330 on: February 15, 2016, 10:14:00 pm »
On a completely different health issue.....

Huge respect for the BBC.....

Their season on mental health is inspiring.....  Speaking about things that are (all too often) not spoken about.

Leading into the news highlighting funding issues as well....

Coverage across all their platforms too.....

And despite such a difficult subject matter, much of what has been broadcast has been done so in a more positive way.
“Happiness can be found in the darkest of times, if one only remembers to turn on the light.”
“Generosity always pays off. Generosity in your effort, in your work, in your kindness, in the way you look after people and take care of people. In the long run, if you are generous with a heart, and with humanity, it always pays off.”
W

Offline Mutton Geoff

  • 'The Invigilator'
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 32,682
  • Life is a journey, not a destination.
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #331 on: February 16, 2016, 08:27:10 am »
Given Hunt famously wrote about the destruction of the NHS he is only following his own agenda with the support of the Cabinet so why are we surprised when you put a fox in charge of a hen house it's not going to end well,
Mellowing and Retired, and stayed around long enough to watch the Tories implode

Offline stewil007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,260
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #332 on: February 16, 2016, 02:58:24 pm »
When i have conversations with people about the sell off of the NHS and what is happening NOW, i usually get the comeback that Labour started it back when they were in office.

I'll be honest, i dont have the knowledge to counter the argument when that is thrown at me.  How do you lot counter their argument? 

Offline nick_8589

  • Kopite
  • *****
  • Posts: 504
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #333 on: February 16, 2016, 06:15:27 pm »
When i have conversations with people about the sell off of the NHS and what is happening NOW, i usually get the comeback that Labour started it back when they were in office.

I'll be honest, i dont have the knowledge to counter the argument when that is thrown at me.  How do you lot counter their argument? 

They did lay some of the ground work some of it unintentionally some of it was just very short sighted, the Torries have taken that ball and ran further than labour ever intended though, labour to my knowlage never had someone run the nhs who was on record calling for its dismantlement.

Offline B0151?

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 19,160
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #334 on: February 16, 2016, 06:57:32 pm »
Besides, just because Labour did it doesn't mean anyone thought they were right. Not many Labour supporters regard the Blair/Brown tenure as perfect. It's a bit of a shite point from those people if you ask me. As you say, what matters is what's happening now, and if they support the NHS they should be criticizing whoever is putting it at risk.

Offline HarryLabrador

  • went broke, so had to get the retrievers in.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,263
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #335 on: February 16, 2016, 08:37:26 pm »
A little bit of history here:

Margaret Thatcher sowed the seeds of NHS Privatisation

As ever, things are more subtle. Following recommendations in the Griffith’s Report the Thatcher government introduced ‘Modern Management Processes’ to replace the older system on ‘Consensus Management’. Then in 1988, and again in 1989, a review of the NHS (and subsequent White Papers ‘Working for Patients’ and ‘Caring for People’), led to the introduction in England of National Health Service & Community Care Act.

This Act defined what was to be known as the ‘Internal Market’, which introduced the following changes:
“The market splits health authorities (which commission care for their local population) from hospital trusts (which compete to provide care). GP fundholding, which gives some family doctors budgets to buy care on their patients’ behalf, is introduced.’

In The Impact of the NHS Market, CIVITAS described the intention was:
“...for purchasers to choose the most suitable services at the best prices. Healthcare services could be purchased from public (NHS) providers (including new self-governing hospitals called NHS Trusts, other health authorities’ hospitals, and health authorities’ own self-managed hospitals) and independent suppliers, who were all to compete for contracts.” “Fundholders were to be motivated by the ability to reinvest any profit gained from efficient purchasing back into general practice, to spend as they liked.”

CIVITAS goes on to say:
The Labour Party initially campaigned against the internal market, claiming it had fragmented the NHS and distorted incentives. Upon coming to power in 1997, they published The New NHS: modern, dependable, which rejected both the old command-and-control management of the 1970s and 80s, and the Conservatives’ internal market. However, the purchaser-provider split was retained and carried on through a new ‘third way’.

In theory this policy aim endorsed a public/private ‘partnership’ approach to running the NHS, but in practice it created an intense focus on performance measurement (targets and monitoring). GP fundholding was abolished, and primary care groups (later primary care trusts) were established as the new commissioning bodies, but with a greater focus on needs assessment and accountability to the local community. District health authorities became, simply, health authorities (and later ‘strategic health authorities’).

Although they initially helped primary care groups with needs assessment, they were to ultimately take on a more managerial role, determining local targets and standards.


Even if Thatcher’s Government did introduce such reforms, others have certainly expanded on them, even the aforementioned Labour administration under Tony Blair.

If she can be held responsible for getting the ball rolling, it’s questionable as to whether she can be held accountable for the current state of the NHS or for the failure of successive administrations to corrects the ills of her reforms.

http://josharcher.uk/blog/why-margaret-thatcher-is-hated/#8
SoS Membership Number: 387

Online macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,236
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #336 on: February 17, 2016, 12:36:48 am »
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/feb/15/weekend-effect-on-hospital-deaths-not-proven-say-hunts-own-officials?CMP=fb_gu

Seven-day NHS may not cut death rates, say Hunt's own officials
Blow to health secretary’s case for ‘seven-day NHS’ as leaked report ‘cannot evidence’ link between consultant presence and mortality rates

 
Jessica Elgot and Denis Campbell
Monday 15 February 2016 21.16 GMT Last modified on Tuesday 16 February 2016 17.27 GMT

Jeremy C*nt’s key argument in his demands for a seven-day service in NHS hospitals has been called into question by his own department, in a leaked report which says it is not able to prove that fuller staffing would lower the numbers of weekend-admitted patients dying.

The report also admits it will be “challenging” to meet the government’s promise to recruit 5,000 more GPs by 2020, a Conservative pledge during the election campaign, and that 11,000 new staff will be needed to run a seven-day service in hospitals.

The increased numbers of deaths among patients admitted at weekends has been the cornerstone for Hunt’s argument in favour of a seven-day health service, with the health secretary citing 15 international studies since 2010, including one co-authored by the NHS’s top doctor Prof Sir Bruce Keogh, which indicate an increase of deaths in hospitals at the weekend.

However, an internal Department of Health draft report, leaked to the Guardian, says the department “cannot evidence the mechanism by which increased consultant presence and diagnostic tests at weekends will translate into lower mortality and reduced length of stay”.

Critics have long argued Hunt’s figures are skewed and that patients who attend hospital at weekends are far likely to be sicker or unable to access alternative palliative care services.

Hunt threatened last July to impose a new contract on consultants to help bring about the seven-day NHS, if they did not resume negotiations. The tactic worked and negotiations restarted in September. Talks were said to be going well, but the junior doctors’ dispute, in which Hunt has vowed to impose a new contract, has complicated matters and delayed final agreement being reached.

When the Guardian interviewed Hunt last Friday, he refused to rule out imposing a contract on consultants in England if they did not agree to work at weekends as part of their normal duties, as part of his push to honour the Conservatives’ manifesto pledge to create a “truly seven-day NHS” by 2020.

Keogh’s September 2015 report for the British Medical Journal found that 11,000 more patients a year die within 30 days of going into hospital if they are admitted for treatment between Friday and Monday, but he said it was “not possible to ascertain the extent to which these excess deaths may be preventable; to assume that they are avoidable would be rash and misleading”.

Consultants currently have a contractual right to refuse non emergency work at weekends or in the evenings, though the majority still do so. In the leaked report from mid-January titled “Seven-day NHS – update on progress and plans”, the department warns:

• Community and social services could not cope with more discharges at weekends.

• More than 11,000 new staff are needed at weekends at hospitals in England if they are to function identically to a weekday, including 3,000 nurses and 4,000 doctors.

• The seven-day plan is likely to have an additional cost of £900m each year.

Other challenges include recruiting the numbers of doctors and other staff needed for seven-day services, and “engaging consultants and junior doctors in the need for change”.

Dr Mark Porter, the British Medical Association’s chair of council, said: “This leaked document makes clear that more seven-day services will require not only thousands of extra doctors, nurses and support staff but an additional investment in both the NHS and community care.

“Its findings also show no proven link between weekend mortality rates and consultant presence, and suggests that other investment is more necessary.”

A Department of Health spokesperson said: “There is clear, independent clinical evidence of variation in the quality of care across the week and, working together with the NHS, we are determined to tackle this problem. Making sure the right staff and support is available for all patients seven days a week is a key part of our approach.”

The BMA and the Royal College of GPs (RCGP) have historically expressed sharp scepticism at the government’s pledge to recruit 5,000 more GPs, a promise reiterated by David Cameron in his election victory speech on 8 May and which the Department of Health says it is still committed to.

NHS England expresses the same concern in the leaked draft report: “The commitment to seven-day GP access is … dependent on the commitment to an additional 5,000 GPs working in general practice, which is a challenging target, both in terms of recruitment and retaining the existing workforce.”

Porter said the document “echoes the BMA’s concerns around the government’s recruitment target for GPs, at a time when one in three GPs are considering retiring in the next five years and hundreds of GP trainee posts were left vacant this year. If the government is to continue with its plans for extra seven-day services, it owes it to patients to convincingly explain how it will finance and staff it”.

Dr Maureen Baker, chair of the RCGP, said the pledge for 5,000 extra GPs was an ambitious target but necessary in an era when family doctors are performing 60m more consultations than five years ago. “It is a pledge that has been made and hard-working GPs across the country who are struggling to cope with unprecedented patient demand, and our patients, are counting on it,” she said.

“Many are leaving the profession to work elsewhere, or choosing to retire early, and there are currently not enough medical graduates becoming GPs to replace them. We fear that the secretary of state’s decision to impose the contract on junior doctors will only exacerbate this situation.”

The NHS can be saved. We just have to decide how to do it
 Read more
The report says that seven-day care may not bring about the faster discharges of patients that the NHS has identified as vital to making the £22bn of efficiency savings it has committed to by 2020, warning that “community and social services [are] not sufficiently in place to support more discharges at weekends”.

Doctors have often argued that it is a lack of available community care, rather than a lack of hospital staff, which keeps patients in hospital longer than they should be.

The report reveals how many staff the government estimates it will need to recruit to cover the seven-day NHS – about 11,000 new staff are needed, including 1,600 consultants, 1,500 registrars and 900 junior doctors.

Senior medical professionals have been warning of a recruitment crisis in the profession, worsened by critically-low morale after Hunt vowed last week to impose a new contact on junior doctors by August.

NHS England’s report says the “additional number of staff required has been calculated by increasing the number of staff at the weekend … in order to match weekdays”.

In 2015, NHS England commissioned Deloitte to produce a report exploring the additional cost of a seven-day NHS service in hospitals. There has not yet been a public account of the findings, but the leaked Department of Health update states that Deloitte found there would be an additional annual net cost of £900m, after “benefits such as reduced length of stay and reduction admissions”. The figure is “the most robust estimate we have,” the report says.

• This article was amended on 16 February 2016. An earlier version said incorrectly that “consultants currently have a contractual right to refuse to work at weekends or in the evenings, though the majority still do so”. Consultants currently only have the right to refuse non-emergency work.
« Last Edit: February 17, 2016, 12:41:42 am by macca007 »

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,794
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #337 on: February 17, 2016, 08:35:26 am »
https://tompride.wordpress.com/2016/02/12/jeremy-hunt-timeline-of-shame/

Jeremy C*nt – TIMELINE OF SHAME

In normal circumstances, openly calling for the dismantling of the NHS would usually exclude someone from being put in charge of it.

Not in Cameron’s cabinet.

In 2009 – before he became Secretary of State for Health – Jeremy C*nt co-wrote a book in which he called for the NHS to be broken up:

Top Tories call for NHS to be dismantled

Once he got the job you’d have thought Jeremy would have at least got to know something about the basics of health care, such as patient confidentiality.

Apparently not:

Jeremy C*nt ‘breached patient confidentiality’ by tweeting hospital picture

Just looking at the sheer number of scandals Jeremy C*nt has been involved in, it’s hard to understand how he’s managed to keep any position in the cabinet:

In 2009, Hunt had to repay £9,500 of taxpayers’ cash in claims for his second home expenses.
In 2010, Hunt gave a civil service job to the daughter of a friend – a Conservative Lord who’d been the director of one of Hunt’s companies.
In 2010, as Sports Minister Hunt blamed ‘hooligans’ for the 1989 Hillsborough disaster – in which 96 Liverpool fans died, a third of them children or teenagers.
In 2010, Hunt was caught hiding behind a tree trying to avoid being spotted going into a private dinner with the Murdochs.
In 2012, Hunt and his advisors were caught leaking sensitive information to Rupert Murdoch’s office when Hunt was supposed to be handling the company’s bid to take over BSkyB.
In 2012, Hunt was caught dodging more than £100,000 in tax in a property deal.
In 2012, Hunt was in charge of the Olympics security fiasco, in which he paid millions of taxpayers’ money to private company G4S who were so incompetent the army and police had to step in.
In 2013, the British Medical Association said Hunt displayed “complete ignorance” after saying he thought the abortion limit should be changed to 12 weeks.
In 2013, Hunt used £4,000 of taxpayers’ money to pay for language lessons so he could learn his Chinese fiancee’s lingo.
In 2016, thousands of junior doctors plan to quit NHS after Hunt imposes new contracts
In fact, multi-millionaire Hunt also likes to make absolutely sure taxpayers pay him for everything, including:

1p for a 12-second phone call, 5p for a paper clip, 8p for a page marker, £700 on signs for one of his houses and £3,180 a year on stamps, envelopes and labels.

And what do we get in return for all this money we’re paying out to him?

A Health Secretary who’s breaking up the NHS and privatising hospital services, has managed to alienate the entire NHS workforce and who’s so incompetent it’s gone global.

In fact, it would be fair to say that this Hunt is a true star of Hameron’s habinet.
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,794
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #338 on: February 17, 2016, 08:42:26 am »
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,794
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #339 on: February 17, 2016, 08:47:05 am »
http://www.thecanary.co/2016/02/16/tories-latest-broken-promise-confirms-bbcs-political-coverage-beyond-joke/

Tories’ latest broken promise confirms BBC’s political coverage is beyond a joke

Our public service broadcaster has failed to hold the Tories to account yet again, this time over their latest broken manifesto pledge. The BBC just revealed that the Tories have cut mental health funding for the NHS by 2% from 2013/14 to 2014/15.

This is another revelation that is contrary to the Conservatives’ manifesto:



Their manifesto reads “we are increasing funding for mental health care”, while it was being cut from 2013-15.

The BBC not only omitted this from the article, but also advertised a ‘manifesto checker’ in the side-bar on their website:



The manifesto checker didn’t mention this commitment either. Ironically, then, the BBC failed to check the Tories’ manifesto within an article offering a ‘manifesto checker’, which also failed to check the manifesto.

Maybe if the BBC spent less time designing an emblem that looks like the title sequence of a movie starring Nicholas Cage, and more time monitoring the Conservative party, the Tories wouldn’t keep getting away with it.

We can assume the function of a ‘manifesto checker’ is to maintain the legitimacy of the Conservative’s mandate to govern. Breaking their promises brings into question their democratic credibility, without a transparent and well-justified explanation. However, mental health funding was not the only pledge the BBC’s manifesto checker failed to sufficiently scrutinise.

The utility has three categories for the policies it lists:



The Health section of the manifesto checker categorises the government’s promise to provide the NHS with £8bn in extra funding by 2020 as “policy has been delivered”.

It cites George Gideon Oliver Osborne, son of Sir Peter Osborne, 17th Baronet of Ballentaylor and Ballylemon and Felicity Alexandra Loxton-Peacock, educated at St. Paul's and Magdalen College, Oxford’s budget as evidence:

The chancellor recommitted to this in the July 2015 Budget and subsequent Spending Review.

Recommitting to a pledge does not constitute delivery. This policy should be in the red category, because recommitting to a policy constitutes “little or no progress”. Especially when this is happening in the context of £22bn worth of ‘efficiency savings’, which is Tory language for cuts. Also, according to the Nuffield Trust’s renowned think-tank, the number of patients attending hospital in an emergency is up 3.6% annually, while funding is only up 1% per year. Not only is this unsustainable, but it’s completely at odds with a sufficient increase in funding.

Numbers mean nothing without the context surrounding them. £8bn just sounds like a large number to readers and is misleading.

Just because a pledge checks out within its own narrow parameters does not mean relevant context and its likely implications should not be provided. Especially when it represents a straightforward contradiction.

Similarly, the manifesto tracker categorises the pledge “increase NHS spending every year” as “policy has been delivered”, citing again that Osborne had ‘recommitted’ to it. Again, the so-called manifesto checker conflates ‘recommitting’ to a policy with delivering it. And according to independent monitors like the Nuffield Trust, current Tory health spending is, on the contrary, unsustainable.

Besides, they could be increasing spending by a few peanuts and that would tick the box. The pledge should state: “Increase NHS funding by enough every year to keep it running smoothly”. The policy is so vague that anyone could deliver it through monthly £1.50 donations.

If the Conservative party were not consistently disingenuous, perhaps this would be a less damning transgression. Any manifesto checker worth its salt should not just include whether the government keeps manifesto pledges, but also anything they have done that they failed to mention. Otherwise the Tories will not be held to account, even though their mandate to govern has been undermined.

In the education section of the manifesto checker there is no mention that the Tories have scrapped the maintenance grant for low-income university students. This is despite there being no word of it in their manifesto.

Neither did it note in the welfare section that the Tories’ have in fact cut child tax-credits, even though David Cameron categorically stated on BBC television he would not.

However, most significant is this: creating a lousy manifesto tracker is worse than not creating one at all. The BBC readership will now assume the Tories have been challenged on their electoral commitments and have done pretty well in the process. This, in turn, upholds the Conservative’s integrity in public discourse, when really, it is in tatters.

That is an affront to democracy. If the Tories are disingenuous, misleading or break the policies they were elected to deliver, their mandate to govern has been undermined. The duty of the BBC and any credible ‘manifesto checker’ is to inform the public of this.
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Online Jshooters

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,781
  • Occasionally inspirational
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #340 on: February 17, 2016, 01:43:29 pm »
^ I've just submitted a complaint to the BBC based on that article... be interesting to see what they respond with
Believer

Offline spen71

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,280
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #341 on: February 17, 2016, 03:17:36 pm »
The BBC just like the Tory government are not fit for purpose

Offline Wilmo

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,219
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #342 on: February 17, 2016, 07:46:35 pm »
The BBC just like the Tory government are not fit for purpose

Desperately sad to see. I grew up loving the BBC, no idea what they're playing at now though. Heartbreaking really. This government is a cancer that has spread to seemingly every facet of public life in the most insidious and destructive way possible.
'History has always shown that when we stay together we can sort out problems. When we split then we start fighting. There was not one time in history where division creates success.' - Klopp

Offline Broad Spectrum

  • Antibiotic
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,633
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #343 on: February 17, 2016, 10:38:16 pm »
I was going to start a thread from this story focusing on the importance of vaccinations, but as the Meningitis B vaccine was provided by the NHS, albeit for children up to 6 months, thought it was more appropriate to stick it in here. Such a sad story:

Thousands sign petition after mum shares image of girl's meningitis

And back in September 2015, an academic wrote an article for the Guardian expressing their concern that many children were still at risk from Men B because in theory, the risk of contracting the infection remained relatively high up until the age of 5. Children over the age of 6 months when the scheme was introduced unfortunately missed out.

Why is the NHS vaccination for meningitis B not provided to everyone?

Although I've been completely against all the junior doctor and privatisation schemes plaguing the NHS over recent months, I'm not necessarily pointing the finger here. But it's frustrating nonetheless.

Online macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,236
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #344 on: February 21, 2016, 10:25:04 pm »
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/revealed-62m-black-hole-merseyside-10923673#ICID=FB-Liv-main

hospitals’ finances
11:24, 21 FEB 2016 UPDATED 11:24, 21 FEB 2016 BY JOSHUA TAYLOR
Eight of the region’s 11 hospital trusts are on course to bust their budgets in 2015/16
   
Merseyside’s hospitals have a £62m black hole in their finances, an ECHO investigation today reveals.

Eight of the region’s 11 hospital trusts are currently running at a deficit – meaning they are spending more money than they receive in funding.

Three of these trusts are on course to bust their budgets by more than £10m each when the NHS financial year ends next month.

The biggest black hole is found in the accounts of Wirral’s Arrowe Park and Clatterbridge hospitals – where NHS bosses are predicting an overspend of £15m for 2015/16.

Southport and Ormskirk hospitals are on course for a £14.75m deficit, while Aintree Hospital will exceed its budget by £12.9m.

Liverpool Women’s Hospital , which previously warned it could become “financially unviable” in 2016/17, will have a deficit of £7.3m when the 2015/16 year ends in March.

The deficits being predicted by the eight Merseyside hospitals trusts add up to a combined £62.45m.

Labour MP Luciana Berger
Wavertree MP Luciana Berger , a member of Labour’s shadow health team, added: “These findings show how badly the Government’s mismanagement of NHS finances is impacting here in Merseyside.

“While Tory ministers cut nurse training places, more hospitals have had to turn to expensive agency staffing and deficits have soared.

“Despite the scale of the challenge, ministers are still driving through unrealistic efficiency savings, which experts warn could impact upon patient care.”

Dr Alex Scott-Samuel, a University of Liverpool senior public health lecturer, said NHS finances are in a state of “chaos”.

He said: “An intended chaos has been introduced into the NHS in order to undermine it and increase pressure for charges and privatisation.

“The NHS is under-funded and being slowly devalued.”
« Last Edit: February 21, 2016, 10:27:55 pm by macca007 »

Offline Red Beret

  • Yellow Beret. Wants to sit in the Lobster Pot. Fat-fingered. Key. Boa. Rd. Kille. R. tonunlick! Soggy Knickers King. Bed-Exiting / Grunting / Bending Down / Cum Face Champion 2023.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 51,709
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #345 on: February 23, 2016, 11:33:24 am »
I don't always visit Lobster Pot.  But when I do. I sit.

Popcorn's Art

Online macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,236
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #346 on: February 23, 2016, 11:59:20 am »
Blaming women on a shortfall of consultants as they are more likely to work part time.  They can fuck off with this. Blame the lack of training doctors for the last 20 years to be able to fill the posts.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/12165672/Soaring-vacancies-of-hospital-consultants-with-4-in-10-posts-unfilled.html
« Last Edit: February 24, 2016, 07:20:37 am by macca007 »

Offline Guz-kop

  • Baz cop
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,487
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #347 on: February 23, 2016, 10:24:53 pm »
Three further 48 hour periods of industrial action planned by Doctors in March and April.

Has a government ever alienated a group of public sector workers like this? 50,000 doctors, almost everyone against current government policy. The miner's had bigger numbers but progressively less universal support amongst workers and public?
It's wonderful, it's marvellous, it's 3-3

Online macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,236
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #348 on: February 29, 2016, 08:29:27 am »
And yet they are taking away 1 of the reasons I done my degree to become a health care professional in removing paid tuition fees and bursaries.  I know we have posts for doctors to be filled and we cant get staff and are looking abroad to fill them as its the only option.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-35667939
Thousands of NHS nursing and doctor posts lie vacant

By Dominic Hughes and Vanessa Clarke
BBC News


22 minutes ago

 From the section Health
 
 
More than two-thirds of trusts and health boards in the UK are actively trying to recruit from abroad as they struggle to cope with a shortage of qualified staff, figures reveal.

Tens of thousands of NHS nursing and doctor posts are vacant.

The statistics, obtained by the BBC, show the scale of the NHS recruitment crisis.

Health unions blame poor workforce planning, but officials say the NHS has more staff than ever before.

Data from a BBC Freedom of Information request shows that on 1 December 2015, the NHS in England, Wales and Northern Ireland had more than 23,443 nursing vacancies - equivalent to 9% of the workforce.


In comparison, the average vacancy rate across the UK economy from November to January 2016 was 2.7%, according to the Office for National Statistics.

The figures - which include 106 out of 166 trusts in England, Wales and Northern Ireland - also revealed:
◾Between 2013 and 2015, there has been a 50% increase in nursing vacancies, from 12,513 to 18,714.
◾For doctors, the number of vacancies went from 2,907 to 4,669 - an increase of roughly 60%.
◾In England and Wales, there were 1,265 vacancies for registered nurses in emergency departments - about 11% of the total.
◾For consultants in emergency medicine there were 243 vacancies - again 11% of the total.
◾Paediatric consultants - specialists in the care of babies, children and young people - were also hard to recruit, with 221 vacancies - about 7% of the total.

Vacancy rates in Scotland are published quarterly and so comparable figures are not yet available.  In England, many hospitals are having to rely on expensive agency workers to make up the shortfall in staff.  That has been identified as a key factor driving a growing financial crisis within the health service.
 

NHS recruitment crisis:

69% of UK trusts are actively recruiting abroad for doctors or nurses

23,443 nursing vacancies in England, Wales & Northern Ireland

9% vacancy rate for nurses

6,207 doctor vacancies

7% vacancy rate for doctors

Source: BBC Freedom of Information request


NHS recruitment crisis in numbers
One solution to the staff shortage adopted by many trusts is employing doctors and nurses from overseas.

The BBC also asked trusts and health boards across the UK whether they were actively recruiting staff from abroad, and in this case Scottish hospitals were also able to answer.

The figures show more than two-thirds - 69% - of all NHS trusts and health boards are seeking staff overseas.

And in just England and Wales, the figure is nearly three-quarters of all trusts - 74%.

Some are travelling from as far afield as India and the Philippines.


'No opportunities back home'

Maca Fernandez Carro said she liked working for the NHS

Maca Fernandez Carro is a nurse who is originally from Bilbao in Spain, but has worked at Royal Bolton Hospital since 2014.

She told BBC Radio 5 live: "There was no opportunities for us back home. The options were having a three-month contract [in Spain], or coming here with a permanent position.

"Nursing is so different back home. When we qualify [in Spain] we are expected to do all the techniques that over here you'd need extra training [for].

"So we do a four-year degree, instead of a three-year one, so we have an extra year in which we train the technical part of nursing.

"Even though we are really under pressure, and really, really stressed - I like working for the NHS."


Hard to recruit

More than two-thirds of trusts are looking to recruit nurses from overseas

The health unions, the Royal College of Nursing and the British Medical Association blame poor workforce planning for the problems hospitals are having in finding qualified staff.

Janet Davies, chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing, said: "Nursing posts are often the first target when savings need to be made, leading the NHS to find itself dangerously short and having to spend more on agency staff and recruitment from other countries.

"The modest increases made in training places are not nearly enough to tackle current problems or the significant challenges facing the NHS over the coming decade."

A spokesman for the doctor's union the BMA - which is currently locked in a dispute with the government in England over a new contract for junior doctors - said the crisis in recruitment was down to a number of factors.

"Poor workforce planning means we aren't producing enough doctors and sending them to the right areas," he said.

More staff than ever

But in a statement, the Department of Health in England said: "Staffing is a priority — that's why there are already over 29,600 extra clinical staff, including more than 10,600 additional doctors and more than 10,600 additional nurses on our wards since May 2010."

But the statement also acknowledged that "much more needs to be done", and said the government was "changing student nursing, midwifery and allied health professionals funding to create up to 10,000 more training places by the end of this Parliament."

Danny Mortimer, the chief executive of NHS Employers, which covers NHS trusts in England and Wales, added that he was "deeply concerned" about the shortages, and said action to address nurse vacancies must be a priority.

"Whilst measures such as increasing nursing training have been introduced, they take time to come to fruition," he added.

Viewers in England can see more on this story on Inside Out on BBC One at 19:30 GMT.
« Last Edit: February 29, 2016, 08:37:36 am by macca007 »

Offline Fat Scouser

  • Trolley Dolly with a 54 2/3 inch waist - last seen shopping on Scottie Road for speedos. Is just a bit.....you know.....
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 23,906
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #349 on: March 1, 2016, 04:07:30 pm »
Getting critical this now
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XmKobXjAG6A
 https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petition  Tx for time/support

It's about the so called "Consultation" the Tories held on the contaminated blood scandal. And it only takes a mo, so please watch, sign and share it on any other sites you use.

I'm sure some will think, why's it in here. But it's just another part of the dirty web the Tories are tying round the NHS. They've already sold off the Plasma Division to an American hedgefund, Baine Capital.

I'm not sure if he still is, but Mitt Romney was the CEO of Baine at the time. And if he's gone, there'll only be another Vulture in his place. So there's a plain indication of what TTIP will bring.

I've just got in from Bournemouth hospital. An old friend is having heart troubles. He's been in for about 6 days now, but I'm sure he'll be alright. He's in good hands. It's a great hospital. But the little cafe that was ran by the Woman's Institute is now a fancy Starbucks type gaff. The Pharmacy is now a Boots. And it was a tenner to give him a days telly. So I walked rather than pay that to park an all.  But f**k only knows what he'll do when he needs further treatment by the end of this Parliament. Bad, sad times.

Anyway, please sign the petition if you can and a big thanks if you do. On top of everything else they've suffered, these people are about to be ripped right off.
Tories, eh.
"A peasant you are. A peasant you will remain. And we shall use all our wealth and power, to make your lot even worse and keep you exactly where you are, Bondage!"    The Boy King, Richard II, after  putting down the The Peasants Revolt in 1381.

http://misterinobody.weebly.com/

Offline zebenzui

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,923
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #350 on: March 1, 2016, 05:08:13 pm »

Offline HarryLabrador

  • went broke, so had to get the retrievers in.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,263
SoS Membership Number: 387

Offline Wilmo

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,219
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #352 on: March 1, 2016, 05:36:37 pm »
Your petition link doesn't work.  :-\

Edit: Posted the wrong petition from the video, oops!

Thought I might post this, an edit of a recent government panel reviewing the junior doctor's contract with bits from In The Loop. The funny bits help soften how depressing it is that these people have a say in the future of our NHS.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnH-Pc6MicM
« Last Edit: March 1, 2016, 06:21:11 pm by Wilmo »
'History has always shown that when we stay together we can sort out problems. When we split then we start fighting. There was not one time in history where division creates success.' - Klopp

Offline Fat Scouser

  • Trolley Dolly with a 54 2/3 inch waist - last seen shopping on Scottie Road for speedos. Is just a bit.....you know.....
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 23,906
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #353 on: March 1, 2016, 05:38:22 pm »
Ooops. Sorry folks. Cut and paste not too swift, you want to see my wallpapering. But the one Harry put up - https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitions/nhs-contaminated-blood-scandal - is correct.

Thanks H. I just popped into fix it. Somebody told me I'd done it wrong in another post. What a dope. But the rest of it's right, a terrible thing is about to be done to these people. So thanks to everyone that signs. But I'll leave it that. We all know how bad this government is, and the NHS is the fight none of us can afford to lose.
"A peasant you are. A peasant you will remain. And we shall use all our wealth and power, to make your lot even worse and keep you exactly where you are, Bondage!"    The Boy King, Richard II, after  putting down the The Peasants Revolt in 1381.

http://misterinobody.weebly.com/

Offline HarryLabrador

  • went broke, so had to get the retrievers in.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,263
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #354 on: March 3, 2016, 09:28:25 am »
This is getting beyond a joke. Monitoring this will be a nightmare and the admin costs will be ridiculous. The government invested hugely in centralising NHS databases. If a patient moves and does not notify their GP and then registers somewhere else, the data is there which should be shared, as surely a patient, with his unique NHS number, would not be allowed to register in more than one surgery? Likewise, if a patient dies, the data is still available. We are all microchipped and for those who are not, then there’s nothing for the system to worry about. Not rocket science is it?

Patients who do not use GP for five years 'may be barred from practice'
The plan being developed in the east of England is intended to find out if people no longer require services, have moved house or have died

Patients who do not visit a surgery for five years will be sent two letters, and will be removed from the practice list if they do not respond.

Wednesday 2 March 2016 00.17 GMT Last modified on Wednesday 2 March 2016 07.07 GMT

Patients who do not visit their GP for five years could be barred from their doctor’s surgery under plans being developed in the east of England.

Under the move, patients who have not seen their GP for five years will be sent two letters asking them to respond. If they do not get in touch to say they still wish to be registered with their GP, they will be removed from the GP practice list.

GPs are paid for every patient on their list – in 2013/14, the average GP practice received funding worth £136 for each registered patient. The drive by the NHS England regional team – known as list cleansing - is intended to cut costs to the NHS. The idea is to find out whether patients no longer require services or have moved house, left the country or died.

But critics have warned that “ghost patients” are being removed inappropriately as part of such drives.

Pulse magazine, which published details of the plan, has also carried out its own investigations that suggests thousands of “ghost patients” have been inappropriately removed from GP lists in recent years.

The NHS England East team sent a letter to groups of GPs known as local medical committees (LMCs) stating that people who had not seen their GP for five years “may be the people who no longer require services” and may be in “incredibly good health”.

It said list validation was necessary “to protect NHS money and ensure patient lists are not artificially inflated”.
But GP leaders said the move would increase their workload and could disproportionately affect some groups, such as adolescents.

Cambridgeshire LMCs said it had data that showed some groups, particularly children in early adolescence and men aged 20 to 45, could be disproportionately affected by the move.

In a letter to practices, Cambridgeshire LMCs said it was very concerned by the move “on grounds of discrimination, on grounds of workload, on grounds of making care for children and middle-aged men less accessible”.

The LMC added: “We note the true motive for this proposal from NHS England is, as they say, ‘to protect NHS money and ensure patient lists are not artificially inflated’.”

Cambridgeshire LMCs chief executive Dr Guy Watkins told Pulse that children aged eight to 15 would be affected “because they’re post routinely being seen, post most childhood illnesses, but actually they’re not being routinely brought by their parents”.

Dr Richard Vautrey, the British Medical Association’s GP committee deputy chairman, said: “Schemes like this just add to GP workload and irritate patients. Many patients understandably believe that this is something the practice has done to them and don’t realise that this has been carried out by NHS England.

“It therefore needlessly undermines the relationship between GP and patient. Patients should not be punished for being too healthy and being careful about how they use NHS services.”

Katherine Murphy, chief executive of the Patients Association, said: “It’s a slippery slope. Patients may receive the letter but not understand what they need to do.

“What mechanisms have they put in place to allow patients to respond to these letters given how difficult it is to get through to GPs?

“What if a patient has been in extremely good health, understands the pressures GPs are under and has deliberately not used the service? Will good patients be punished? I think patients will be unfairly discriminated against.”

In 2012, a report from the Audit Commission found that GPs had been paid for thousands of patients on their lists who had moved practice, died or been forced to leave the country. It identified more than 95,000 patients who needed removing from GP lists in England and Wales.

Ruth Derrett, locality director for NHS England East, said: “List validation is something which routinely takes place to ensure GP practices have the correct numbers of patients registered.

“NHS England in the east is currently looking at a validation process whereby patients who have not accessed their GP in five years are contacted. Under the process no patients will be removed from the GP’s list if they wish to stay registered with their GP.”

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/mar/02/patients-who-do-not-use-gp-for-five-years-may-be-barred-from-practice
SoS Membership Number: 387

Offline Trada

  • Fully paid up member of the JC cult. Ex-Tory boy. Corbyn's Chief Hagiographer. Sometimes hasn't got a kloop.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 22,821
  • Trada
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #355 on: March 7, 2016, 01:13:43 am »
GPs must learn e-efficiency from Easyjet, says Jeremy C*nt

GPs must take efficiency lessons from Easyjet if they are to provide better care for the elderly, according to the Health Secretary, who has admitted there is no more money to improve matters.

 Jeremy C*nt said GP surgeries needed to start offering “e-consultations” to turn 10 minute appointments for minor conditions into those lasting just 60 seconds, if they were to improve care for the most needy groups.

He said there were “substantial savings” to be garnered from putting services online, as pioneered by internet banks and low-cost airlines.

Mr Hunt was speaking at a Royal College of GPs event launching a guide for doctors who are starting to offer online appointments and medical records access.

GPs presented a pilot, in which patients with conditions like hay fever will be encouraged to fill in online forms of symptoms and history, for doctors to review prior to a very brief consultation.

Dr Arvind Madan, a GP with the Hurley Group, said: “We can take a 10 minute appointment, and turn it into a one minute analysis of their history.”

 Praising the initiative, Mr Hunt said: “There are three additional things that we need GPs to do, that we don't have any more money to offer for them to do, because the money is not there.

“They are be open longer hours, more proactive management of frail, elderly and people with long term conditions … and more proactive early diagnosis of people in high-risk groups, so we pick up more things like cancer and diabetes.”

He continued: “So it's incredibly important to see if there is a way of turning 10 minutes into one minute.”

Describing the NHS as “a bit behind” other areas when it came to “harnessing the efficiency of IT”, he added: “The encouraging thing is if you look at other industries they have found those efficiency savings.

"So, online banking, online booking of air tickets - everyone would accept that there are substantial savings with the whole Easyjet model."

But Dr Chaand Nagpaul, the British Medical Association's lead on IT, described Mr Hunt’s comparison as “simplistic”, as big NHS users like the elderly often did not have online access.

“What patients and GPs actually want is for consultation times to go up from 10 to 20 minutes,” he claimed.

“Nobody at the BMA is against using technology to save GPs time, but we have to be careful.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/9913576/GPs-must-learn-e-efficiency-from-Easyjet-says-Jeremy-Hunt.html#disqus_thread
Don't blame me I voted for Jeremy Corbyn!!

Miss you Tracy more and more every day xxx

“I carry them with me: what they would have thought and said and done. Make them a part of who I am. So even though they’re gone from the world they’re never gone from me.

Online macca007

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,236
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #356 on: March 23, 2016, 04:38:00 pm »
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-35884239?ns_mchannel=social

Junior doctors to stage A&E walkout
By Nick Triggle

Junior doctors in England are escalating strike action next month to include a walkout of emergency care.
It will be the first time ever doctors have refused to provide cover in areas such as A&E and intensive care - the strikes so far have hit routine care.
The British Medical Association said it had been left with "no choice" in its fight against the government's plan to impose a new contract.
The all-out stoppages will take place from 08:00 to 17:00 on 26 and 27 April.
It will mean consultants will have to be drafted in from across the hospital to staff emergency care, potentially causing lots of disruption to many routine services.
The Department of Health branded it "desperate and irresponsible" and warned it would harm patients.

There have been three strikes so far in this dispute, but on each occasion junior doctors have staffed emergency care.
It has meant the impact has been limited to the postponing of 19,000 routine operations and treatments - less than one in 10 of those planned on those days.
The two all-out strikes now announced replace a 48-hour walkout of non-emergency care planned for those days.
A 48-hour stoppage where emergency cover is to be provided from 08:00 on 6 April will go ahead as planned.
How far apart were the two sides?
BMA badgeImage copyrightPA
The BMA wanted everyone who worked on a Saturday to be paid at 50% above the basic rate
Ministers only offered extra pay after 17:00 and at a lower rate of 30%
But they have agreed to top up the pay by 30% for those who work regular Saturdays - defined as at least one in four
Agreement was also not reached on on-call allowances, how limits on working hours are to be policed and days off between night shifts
The government offered a basic pay rise of 13.5%
The BMA has said it was willing to accept between a 4% and 7% rise in basic pay to cover more generous weekend pay
Analysis: Was a deal ever possible?
BMA junior doctor leader Dr Johann Malawana said: "No junior doctor wants to take this action but the government has left us with no choice.
"In refusing to lift imposition and listen to junior doctors' outstanding concerns, the government will bear direct responsibility for the first full walk-out of doctors in this country.
"The government is refusing to get back around the table and is ploughing ahead with plans to impose a contract junior doctors have no confidence in and have roundly rejected.
"We want to end this dispute through talks but the government is making this impossible."
But a spokesperson for the Department of Health said: "This escalation of industrial action is both desperate and irresponsible - and will inevitably put patients in harm's way.
"If the BMA had agreed to negotiate on Saturday pay as they promised to do we'd have a negotiated agreement by now."
Talks between the government and BMA broke down in January, prompting the government to announce in February it would be imposing the contract from this summer.
Ministers have said the changes, which will see doctors paid less for working weekends, are needed to improve care at weekends. This is disputed by the BMA.
Jeremy Taylor, chief executive of National Voices, a coalition of 160 charities and patient groups, responded by urging ministers to drop plans to impose the contract and for the two sides to get back round the negotiating table.
"The only people who will suffer are patients," he added.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2016, 04:39:59 pm by macca007 »

Offline The Gulleysucker

  • RAWK's very own spinached up Popeye. Transfer Board Veteran 5 Stars.
  • RAWK Remembers
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 11,496
  • An Indolent Sybarite
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #357 on: April 7, 2016, 10:29:55 am »
Health education bosses are considering bringing trained GPs over from India in a bid to alleviate the training crisis, Pulse understands.

Health Education England have signed a ‘memorandum of understanding’ with Apollo Hospitals in India, a major hospital chain, which will involve the ‘mutual exchange of clinical staff’.

Pulse understands that this will involve the transfer of GPs to England, potentially up to 400, but HEE said that the details of the MOU ‘are still under discussion’.
Why Hunt’s pre-election promise of 5,000 new GPs is a long way off

Apollo Hospitals currently offers a diploma in family medicine, which is accredited by the RCGP.

It comes after Pulse revealed that the Government is behind on its pledge to increase the GP workforce by 5,000 by 2020.

But international leaders warn that moves to bring in GPs trained overseas could endanger patient safety and the clinicians’ safety.

Dr Ramesh Mehta, president of the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin, told Pulse that his contacts in India have said HEE wants ‘as many GPs as possible’.

He said: ‘I think it is a pity that HEE have to go abroad to recruit for GP positions. Unfortunately, the training of GPs has not been managed properly over the years.’

He added that a lot of UK-trained doctors are leaving the country ‘because of the DH policies and we are looking for doctors from abroad – it doesn’t make sense’.

Dr Mehta also highlighted the number of international medical graduates who are failing the clinical skills assessment component of the MRCGP.

He said: ‘It is unfortunate that a lot of the doctors who are trained and work in the UK, because they cannot pass the CSA component of the exam, are lost to the country. These are doctors who know the system.’

Any GPs who come over from India would have to be ‘given proper support and mentoring so they don’t land in trouble, as has happened in the past when doctors are put in the NHS without proper induction’, he added.

Dr Umesh Prabhu, former chair and current member of the British International Doctors Association executive committee and a consultant paediatrician in Wigan, said he understood that Apollo and HEE were working together to bring GPs to England.

But he said: ‘This is a most dangerous thing, because these doctors are not trained to be GPs in the UK and my biggest worry is around vulnerable patients, such as child abuse. Their training is entirely different. I have concerns for the doctors’ safety and the patients’ safety.’

A HEE statement said: ‘England and India have signed a Memorandum of Understanding as a starting point to exploring how both countries canbenefit from the mutual exchange of ideas.

‘The details of the MoU are still in discussion once we have further confirmed information we will share with you.’

Apollo Hospitals said the memorandum would involve an exchange of clinical staff.

It said: ‘We have signed this Memorandum of Understanding as a starting point to exploring how both countries can benefit from the mutual exchange of ideas and clinical staff in improving the education and training of healthcare staff and therefore the quality of care provided to patients.

‘These are initial discussions but we look forward to announcing the outcomes of this work over the coming months and years as it progresses.’


http://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/your-practice/practice-topics/employment/nhs-looking-to-bring-in-gps-from-india-to-alleviate-recruitment-crisis/20031536.fullarticle
I don't do polite so fuck yoursalf with your stupid accusations...

Right you fuckwit I will show you why you are talking out of your fat arse...

Mutton Geoff (Obviously a real nice guy)

Offline boots

  • upon a hippo only look good if they match the tutu - fact! Oor Wullie, Your Wullie, A'Buddy's Wullie.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,378
  • Klopptimistic
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #358 on: April 8, 2016, 02:47:18 pm »
Wifey recieved a breast scan invite. Although the header was NHS, there was a Virgin Medical header too. Its a slow creep privatisation. This fucking world fucks me right off. Everyone is more concerned with money and buying trinkets. Everyone has a smart phone which effectively gives anyone with the right access the ability to track your life and no fucker is worried by it all. Everyone is sleep walking into an Orwellian world and are even using their own effin money to pay for it. Our Gov must be pissing itself.

How long before the slow creep privatisation of the NHS becomes complete? Before you know it, you will be paying for it and then you'll be left wondering how the fuck this happened. It happened because you are too obsessed with social media, money, celebrities to pay attention to the stuff that actually matters.

People here at work get BUPA. But not one of the arseholes have stopped to think that that money would be better spent on our NHS but as long as they can get white teeth for their scabby little fat kids, that allfuckingrite.

Lets shove loadsa grub in our gobs, get t2 diabetes and watch the starving black kids weeping on our smart phones, oh isnt it sad watching this as we shovel pies in our gullets. How long before you can buy a black kid on fucking ebay to do your fucking chimney? Can I get one to use as a donor when my teeth rot? Or harvest their kidneys?

Ive watched as successive gov, labour and tory, erode our foundations. Enough. Guy Fawkes had the right idea, just the wrong target. Time to burn the establishment and build a fairer world. But if it isnt crowdsourced it wont fucking happen.
Typing with my finger on my computer. Other appendages are available.

Offline Guz-kop

  • Baz cop
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,487
Re: "Sell-Off" - The Abolition of Your NHS
« Reply #359 on: April 9, 2016, 06:33:41 pm »
Wifey recieved a breast scan invite. Although the header was NHS, there was a Virgin Medical header too. Its a slow creep privatisation. This fucking world fucks me right off. Everyone is more concerned with money and buying trinkets. Everyone has a smart phone which effectively gives anyone with the right access the ability to track your life and no fucker is worried by it all. Everyone is sleep walking into an Orwellian world and are even using their own effin money to pay for it. Our Gov must be pissing itself.

How long before the slow creep privatisation of the NHS becomes complete? Before you know it, you will be paying for it and then you'll be left wondering how the fuck this happened. It happened because you are too obsessed with social media, money, celebrities to pay attention to the stuff that actually matters.

People here at work get BUPA. But not one of the arseholes have stopped to think that that money would be better spent on our NHS but as long as they can get white teeth for their scabby little fat kids, that allfuckingrite.

Lets shove loadsa grub in our gobs, get t2 diabetes and watch the starving black kids weeping on our smart phones, oh isnt it sad watching this as we shovel pies in our gullets. How long before you can buy a black kid on fucking ebay to do your fucking chimney? Can I get one to use as a donor when my teeth rot? Or harvest their kidneys?

Ive watched as successive gov, labour and tory, erode our foundations. Enough. Guy Fawkes had the right idea, just the wrong target. Time to burn the establishment and build a fairer world. But if it isnt crowdsourced it wont fucking happen.

Alliance Medical already have a contract nationwide for PET-CT services. I suspect we'll see a lot more of it over the next decade or so in services like radiology, phlebotomy etc
It's wonderful, it's marvellous, it's 3-3