If you can't be bothered to read back even one page don't come here on the bounce with a one liner post please. It takes more effort to reply to that laziness than it does to point the finger.
On the last page alone he's got one poster saying he was poor for not tracking back enough and 'blaming' him for cambiasso's smart play and another saying it was his fault we didn't hold the ball further up the field. Strange when we attacked better than we have in an age, Ricky fucking Lambert is our sole striker and recycling possession is a fundamental of the Rodgers system but there you go.
Just to make sure, I did just re-read the first page.
I stand by my post. The first page of the round-table thread was overwhelmingly positive re Gerrard. Of the 59 mentions of Gerrard, some were duplicates (in quoted posts). The ones you mentioned were the ONLY somewhat negative. There was ONE post that expressed a negative assessment of Gerrard's performance and it was, at worst, a bit hyperbolic.
In the final analysis, if there are particular comments or sentences in particular posts you find problematic, you can address them directly and offer retorts.
As for the general issue of maintaining possession in the opposition half and final third, our most creative and 'disequilibrating' player is also the one most responsible for (often entirely, apparently, inexplicably) failing to control and to maintain possession in the opposition half and final third. The other is Johnson but that goes without saying.
