And they still lost. Anything less than a 3 or 4-0 City win would surprise me.
In injury time. They also gave us a hard game.
I don’t think anyone sane is predicting anything other than a City win, but just that it isn’t totally beyond the realms that Huddersfield might produce a surprise, and if not Huddersfield, Newcastle next week maybe. Of course the likely outcome is City win both, but how anyone can have supported this club for any length of time and not at least entertain the idea that it might not go that way, is beyond me, you only have to go back a month. The last time City lost in 2 games nobody expected them to.
The thing with football these days, and I’m in no way suggesting you’re like this as I have no idea, but it’s just a trend I’ve noticed. With the wealth of stats and information available, people rely too heavily on it, as if the game is some kind of equation, usually so they can be proven right and tel people that they were proven right. You can’t account for football in stats always. A good example is Karius last season when people were saying his numbers make him out to be excellent, when a decent percentage of people just said they had a feeling he’d buckle, which he did. You can make an argument for concussion and maybe that played a part in that particular case, but you get my point.
Yesterday Palace trebled the amount of goals we’ve conceded in one match at Anfield all season and equalled the total number of goals we’ve conceded at Anfield this season. Although some predicted a tricky match yesterday (I wasn’t one of them,) I don’t think anyone would have predicted that.
Even the United sides under Ferguson always lost one or two bizarre matches.