In that article don’t know what to make of the statement ‘tobacco plants cannot cause pathogens that are harmful to human health’. Shame about the other risks to health I’d have thought.
When I read they are looking for "support from government agencies" that basically means they want money to do the research. But I am to believe they will do this as non-profit? Right... I'm sorry, of course whoever is helping with this it's a positive, but I am a real cynic when it comes to tobacco companies. They have been killing millions, for decades now, and they still fight tooth and nail to keep their business, trying to dodge legislation, hunt whistleblowers and so forth.
What I can believe is that as companies they are looking for alternative income in the long run, because maybe one of these days the world will decide enough with cigarettes and they will have to change or shut up shop. Years ago I watched a documentary about tobacco companies (it was mainly about their aggressive seduction of children as young as 7 or 8 years in Asia, because Europe and North America make it more difficult for them these days) and there was a guy from the US Health Authorities and he said that if a product like cigarettes would apply for a licence today they would never ever get approval.
So good idea to help out now, but without these companies many people would have had a longer life and maybe even lived through this new virus. Imho they are afraid that at one point governments and society will come after them, so they are looking to boost their image and possibly add to/change their business model in order to survive.