Author Topic: The Labour Party (*)  (Read 884385 times)

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,716
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6360 on: May 1, 2017, 09:42:07 am »
Yes, Londoners. I know. I'm one of them. If you've managed to miss Andy's frequent tirades against Southerners, Londoners and atheists* I envy you.

* Generally follows the pattern: Prof. Richard Dawkins tweets something -> Andy steams in, either getting the wrong end of the stick or not grasping any wood at all -> Andy mentions a convenient discussion he's had with a rogue atheist -> Andy gets schooled for pages and pages -> It dies down -> Until the next time.

You must have been upset that it wasn't Londoners.

And Dawkins is a fucking blert.
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline JohnnoWhite

  • Deliverer of the -Q- de grace.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,968
  • Thought I was wrong once - but I was mistaken.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6361 on: May 1, 2017, 09:58:08 am »
Just listened and uncontrollably seethed to yesterday's Andrew Marr interview with that thing Teresa May. 

They MUST be binned - or we all of us descend into a savagery the like of which very few Brits alive today will ever have witnessed. Please don't ever say that you as a voter weren't warned or you didn't think it would be like this when you voted for "strong and stable" government.

What a Tory farce!! Strong is easy to spout about when you constantly punish the impoverished and defenceless weak.
There was a time even under the Tories when such policies would have been branded tyrannical and barbaric but with this current brand of Tory "things" running the country, anything that grinds our people further down the social ladder is hailed as strong and stable leadership.
What's even worse is when a government KNOWS that what it is prepared to inflict on the people is the absolute antithesis of what common decency demands it OUGHT to be doing and would be doing had they ANY scrap of moral integrity in their genes.

Real strength of leadership in any so-called civilised society is when a government refuses to compromise on delivering basic humanity to the most vulnerable of its people. I totally reject this constant Tory abuse of the language; I reject their sickening ideology and I deplore this wilful assault on our people. They are smirking gutter scum dressed up in expensive suits that would clothe and feed a desperately impoverished family for a month.

These Tories are criminally responsible for the decline of justice and hope in this dis-United Kingdom. Were there ANY real and meaningful justice, they would ALL of them sitting on their upholstered arses in the Commons be charged with the worst of crimes against OUR nation, consigned to jail and banned from ever holding any political office again.
« Last Edit: May 1, 2017, 10:05:28 am by JohnnoWhite »
There is nothing wrong with striving to win, so long as you don't set the prize above the game. There can be no dishonour in defeat nor any conceit in victory. What matters above all is that the team plays in the right spirit, with skill, courage, fair play,no favour and the result accepted without bitterness. Sir Matt Busby CBE KCSG 1909-1994

Offline Libertine

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,501
  • Nothing behind me, everything ahead of me
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6362 on: May 1, 2017, 10:27:14 am »
These Tories are criminally responsible for the decline of justice and hope in this dis-United Kingdom. Were there ANY real and meaningful justice, they would ALL of them sitting on their upholstered arses in the Commons be charged with the worst of crimes against OUR nation, consigned to jail and banned from ever holding any political office again.

Yes. Let's lock up all of our political opponents. That always leads to better societies.

Offline JohnnoWhite

  • Deliverer of the -Q- de grace.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,968
  • Thought I was wrong once - but I was mistaken.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6363 on: May 1, 2017, 11:09:30 am »
Yes. Let's lock up all of our political opponents. That always leads to better societies.

So you believe their policies deliberately conceived and calculatingly enforced have brought good to our people do you? You don't believe at all that such policies are a punishment visited on those least able to withstand and even more, survive them whilst meanwhile, multi-millionaires rub their hands together at their tax reduction gifts from their Tory friends in Westminster are justifiable?  In my book if these are NOT crimes against our people, WTF kind of a description would you ascribe to them ? So stop playing pseudo smart-arse and debate the extremes they have inflicted on society and tell us why you think these have been for the "good of the nation" eh?
« Last Edit: May 1, 2017, 11:12:48 am by JohnnoWhite »
There is nothing wrong with striving to win, so long as you don't set the prize above the game. There can be no dishonour in defeat nor any conceit in victory. What matters above all is that the team plays in the right spirit, with skill, courage, fair play,no favour and the result accepted without bitterness. Sir Matt Busby CBE KCSG 1909-1994

Offline Johnnyboy1973

  • ★★★ Never, ever, bloody anything ever! ★★★
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,650
  • Up the piss boiling, asthmatic Reds!!!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6364 on: May 1, 2017, 11:15:32 am »
In my book if these are NOT crimes against our people, WTF kind of a description would you ascribe to them?

By the letter of the law they are not crimes so a better descriptions would be 'harms'.
Where's this Yakimoto fella?

Offline SP

  • Thor ain't got shit on this dude! Alpheus. SPoogle. The Equusfluminis Of RAWK. Straight in at the deep end with a tube of Vagisil. Needs to get a half-life. Needs a damned good de-frag.
  • RAWK Staff.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 36,044
  • .
  • Super Title: Southern Pansy
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6365 on: May 1, 2017, 11:16:30 am »
So you believe their policies deliberately conceived and calculatingly enforced have brought good to our people do you? You don't believe at all that such policies are a punishment visited on those least able to withstand and even more, survive them whilst meanwhile, multi-millionaires rub their hands together at their tax reduction gifts from their Tory friends in Westminster is justifiable?  In my book if these are NOT crimes WTF kind of a description would you ascribe to them ? So stop playing pseudo smart-arse and debate the extremes they have inflicted on society and tell us why you think these have been for the "good of the nation" eh?


They have got away with it because of the abject failure of the opposition. The Tories have been pretty well unchallenged, and no credible alternative has been sold to the electorate. The people overwhelmingly think that the Tories are a lesser risk than Labour. That is absolutely damning.

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,716
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6366 on: May 1, 2017, 11:18:52 am »
So you believe their policies deliberately conceived and calculatingly enforced have brought good to our people do you? You don't believe at all that such policies are a punishment visited on those least able to withstand and even more, survive them whilst meanwhile, multi-millionaires rub their hands together at their tax reduction gifts from their Tory friends in Westminster are justifiable?  In my book if these are NOT crimes against our people, WTF kind of a description would you ascribe to them ? So stop playing pseudo smart-arse and debate the extremes they have inflicted on society and tell us why you think these have been for the "good of the nation" eh?

The Tories are trying to turn us into a banana republic with no laws or decency.

Let's not let them.
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Millie

  • Athens Airport Queen. Dude, never mind my car, where's my hand sanitiser?!
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,059
  • IFWT
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6367 on: May 1, 2017, 11:19:17 am »
If you are going to advocate locking up politicians because of their policies then that is a slippery slope and is not democracy.  It will also put people off standing for parliament.

I hate the Tories, I find them abhorrent, but they were voted in under our democracy. 

"If you can't say anything nice, don't say nothing at all"  Thumper (1942)

Justice for the 96

I'm a Believer

Offline Craig S

  • KOP CONDUCTOR
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,011
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6368 on: May 1, 2017, 11:32:44 am »
And this is why the leader's image mattters..

There is a very strong correlation between net party leader rating and election results..

The current ones are in yellow.  We are heading for an era defining battering... :(



Wow, R2 at 0.97, pretty much a perfect correlation.
Even though we dont have a presedential democracy, it's hard to argue that most people don't vote that way.

Offline carling

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,520
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6369 on: May 1, 2017, 11:33:47 am »
Anyone know who the Labour candidate is for Eddisbury?  All my googling efforts are finding is info about the Tory and Lib Dem candidates  :butt

Offline Banquo's Ghost

  • Macbeth's on repeat. To boldly split infinitives that lesser men would dare. To.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,481
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6370 on: May 1, 2017, 11:49:12 am »
This rightly belongs in a Labour Party thread, I believe.

1st May 1997.

Labour seats won 418.

Tories 165.
Be humble, for you are made of earth. Be noble, for you are made of stars.

Offline So… Howard Philips

  • Penile Toupé Extender. Notoriously work-shy, copper-bottomed pervert.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 23,146
  • All I want for Christmas is a half and half scarf
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6371 on: May 1, 2017, 11:57:48 am »
This rightly belongs in a Labour Party thread, I believe.

1st May 1997.

Labour seats won 418.

Tories 165.

I thought for a moment you were going to mention Blair led party putting a Tory government in the bin.

But you didn't so that's OK.

Offline TepidT2O

  • Deffo NOT 9"! MUFC bedwetter. Grass. Folically-challenged, God-piece-wearing, monkey-rubber. Jizz aroma expert. Operating at the lower end of the distribution curve...has the hots for Alan. Bastard. Fearless in transfer windows with lack of convicti
  • Lead Matchday Commentator
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 94,343
  • Dejan Lovren fan club member #1
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6372 on: May 1, 2017, 12:11:10 pm »
The election results on May 4th will undoubtedly be relatively positive compared to the general election polling.

Look at the comparisons for 1983 and 1987. Ok in local elections but dire in general elections.

I know it frustrates people on here that personality politics plays such a part in our electoral system, but it's a fact that it does.  Maybe someday something radical will change this, but the pols show this hasn't happened.


The good news though.... 

That people will still vote labour in local elections shows the party isn't dead.  There's still a huge groundswell of support if the party communicates with its voters rather than just its members.
“Happiness can be found in the darkest of times, if one only remembers to turn on the light.”
“Generosity always pays off. Generosity in your effort, in your work, in your kindness, in the way you look after people and take care of people. In the long run, if you are generous with a heart, and with humanity, it always pays off.”
W

Offline JackWard33

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 26,009
  • President of the Harry Wilson fanclub
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6373 on: May 1, 2017, 12:15:24 pm »
This rightly belongs in a Labour Party thread, I believe.

1st May 1997.

Labour seats won 418.

Tories 165.

Honestly in terms of external events (not personal or family) - one of the happiest days of my life.
I hadn't slept at all and was still pretty pissed turning up to work. And most people were in the same boat. There really was a feeling that the country had a positive exciting future. It was cool.

Offline TepidT2O

  • Deffo NOT 9"! MUFC bedwetter. Grass. Folically-challenged, God-piece-wearing, monkey-rubber. Jizz aroma expert. Operating at the lower end of the distribution curve...has the hots for Alan. Bastard. Fearless in transfer windows with lack of convicti
  • Lead Matchday Commentator
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 94,343
  • Dejan Lovren fan club member #1
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6374 on: May 1, 2017, 12:23:25 pm »
First time I voted in a general election. 

What a feeling it was.
“Happiness can be found in the darkest of times, if one only remembers to turn on the light.”
“Generosity always pays off. Generosity in your effort, in your work, in your kindness, in the way you look after people and take care of people. In the long run, if you are generous with a heart, and with humanity, it always pays off.”
W

Offline Libertine

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,501
  • Nothing behind me, everything ahead of me
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6375 on: May 1, 2017, 12:47:25 pm »
Mary Riddell in the New Statesman, 20 years ago today.


Offline Libertine

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,501
  • Nothing behind me, everything ahead of me
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6376 on: May 1, 2017, 12:51:57 pm »
So you believe their policies deliberately conceived and calculatingly enforced have brought good to our people do you? You don't believe at all that such policies are a punishment visited on those least able to withstand and even more, survive them whilst meanwhile, multi-millionaires rub their hands together at their tax reduction gifts from their Tory friends in Westminster are justifiable?  In my book if these are NOT crimes against our people, WTF kind of a description would you ascribe to them ? So stop playing pseudo smart-arse and debate the extremes they have inflicted on society and tell us why you think these have been for the "good of the nation" eh?

Well, I don't think they have been for the good of the nation as I don't support the Tories and don't vote for them. And that's why I've spent a good proportion of this bank holiday weekend out campaigning to get some of them out of office.

I just happen to have the old fashioned notion that in a democracy you defeat your opponents in the ballot box, not in the courts or on the streets.

Such extremist hyperbole does more harm than good.

Offline Red Beret

  • Yellow Beret. Wants to sit in the Lobster Pot. Fat-fingered. Key. Boa. Rd. Kille. R. tonunlick! Soggy Knickers King. Bed-Exiting / Grunting / Bending Down / Cum Face Champion 2023.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 51,572
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6377 on: May 1, 2017, 01:00:41 pm »
Liverpool could end up being for Labour what the south west was for the Liberals in the 70s and 80s.  No matter what happens, we'll be stuck with same old Labour in Liverpool, with the same incompetence and antics we've seen for years.
I don't always visit Lobster Pot.  But when I do. I sit.

Popcorn's Art

Offline Trev20

  • Wool
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,301
  • I am not!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6378 on: May 1, 2017, 01:14:49 pm »
A spokesperson said it wouldn't be in their manifesto for this year's GE, then a shadow Brexit minister said the party would consider a 2nd ref if there was public call for it AND there was reform within the EU (what that was, he didn't specify) and now you have yesterday's article, co-written by Clive Lewis, who I've read is under threat of losing his seat in pro-Remain Norwich which I'm sure has nothing to do with the production of this article.

So the usual clarity from Labour on Brexit.

https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/news/85395/labour-brexit-spokesman-holds-out-hope-second
Clive Lewis isn't very impressive - no idea why he is apparently held in high esteem within the PLP.

Offline classycarra

  • The Left Disonourable Chuntering Member For Scousepool.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 30,507
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6379 on: May 1, 2017, 01:32:25 pm »
Clive Lewis isn't very impressive - no idea why he is apparently held in high esteem within the PLP.

If he had any nous he could have supported Owen Smith in the selection when he suggested this over six months ago.

Offline classycarra

  • The Left Disonourable Chuntering Member For Scousepool.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 30,507
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6380 on: May 1, 2017, 01:40:48 pm »
Mary Riddell in the New Statesman, 20 years ago today.



Antediluvian - great word. Nicely sums him up, out of date even in '97. Cheers for sharing.

I know it frustrates people on here that personality politics plays such a part in our electoral system, but it's a fact that it does.  Maybe someday something radical will change this, but the pols show this hasn't happened.

The good news though.... 

That people will still vote labour in local elections shows the party isn't dead.  There's still a huge groundswell of support if the party communicates with its voters rather than just its members.

Were it not for personality politics, and people (including the membership) learning the wrong lessons from the right mistakes to improve upon, Corbyn would never have been close to the leadership.

Those figures just go to show how harmful poor Labour leaders are. It's easy for Labour supporters to vote Labour locally, despite major  reservations with the leader in Westminster, but when it comes to general elections, and you have major worires about the damage they could do as Prime Minister it's no wonder there's a disparity between the votes.

Offline Sangria

  • In trying to be right ends up wrong without fail
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 19,113
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6381 on: May 1, 2017, 01:43:38 pm »
Clive Lewis isn't very impressive - no idea why he is apparently held in high esteem within the PLP.

He has a military background.
"i just dont think (Lucas is) that type of player that Kenny wants"
Vidocq, 20 January 2011

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=267148.msg8032258#msg8032258

Offline zero zero

  • Karma's a bitch. Innit.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 15,543
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6382 on: May 1, 2017, 02:23:23 pm »
Well, I don't think they have been for the good of the nation as I don't support the Tories and don't vote for them. And that's why I've spent a good proportion of this bank holiday weekend out campaigning to get some of them out of office.

I just happen to have the old fashioned notion that in a democracy you defeat your opponents in the ballot box, not in the courts or on the streets.

Such extremist hyperbole does more harm than good.
Perfect rejoinder.

Offline hide5seek

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 10,340
  • We all live in THE 5 EUROPEAN CUPS
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6383 on: May 1, 2017, 02:50:09 pm »
Clive Lewis isn't very impressive - no idea why he is apparently held in high esteem within the PLP.
He isn't?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnJem92ElK0

Offline Andy @ Allerton!

  • Missing an asterisk - no, wait sorry, that's his rusty starfish..... RAWK Apple fanboy. Hedley Lamarr's bestest mate. Has done nothing incredible ever.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 73,716
  • Asterisks baby!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6384 on: May 1, 2017, 03:02:11 pm »
Fuck it. I'll vote Labour. Look at the alternatives.

A weird looking Maybot weirdo or fucking the Lib Dems that took it up the hoop for Maybots pals.
Quote from: tubby on Today at 12:45:53 pm

They both went in high, that's factually correct, both tried to play the ball at height.  Doku with his foot, Mac Allister with his chest.

Offline Trev20

  • Wool
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,301
  • I am not!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6385 on: May 1, 2017, 03:07:58 pm »
He isn't?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnJem92ElK0
I heard recently that he is a 'rising star within the Party'  :o

Although to be fair it doesn't take much to be considered a star amoung this lot today.

Offline JohnnoWhite

  • Deliverer of the -Q- de grace.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,968
  • Thought I was wrong once - but I was mistaken.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6386 on: May 1, 2017, 03:11:43 pm »
Well, I don't think they have been for the good of the nation as I don't support the Tories and don't vote for them. And that's why I've spent a good proportion of this bank holiday weekend out campaigning to get some of them out of office.

I just happen to have the old fashioned notion that in a democracy you defeat your opponents in the ballot box, not in the courts or on the streets.

Such extremist hyperbole does more harm than good.

Extremist hyperbole?? Isn't that what these Tory ministers offer every time they back-track/re-write their manifesto pledges? They don't blink an eye in solemnly delivering what is in their world a perfectly rational "solution" to the irksome question of paying benefit support for children born of a rape. How is THAT kind of legislation which demands any mother in this situation to name and declare her child was born as a consequence of a rape IF she wishes to continue to receive support in any way representative of a) a civilised society in this the 21st century or b) as they would have us all believe caring and compassionate Conservatism? It is an affront to common decency if not teetering on the threshold of state blackmail. 
You and others can dress it up any way you like - unsympathetic Tory policy, a political misjudgement, debate and oppose etc etc . For me, it is a deliberate assault on decency at best, and at worst is a criminal offence under Section 21 of Theft Act 1968 which criminalises blackmail. Here the "theft" is that the anonymity of the victim will be revealed if you dare to claim your state benefit. An outrage!

Let me amend that last exclamation for you all - It's much more than just an outrage - it's an absolute nailed-on fucking outrage!!
« Last Edit: May 1, 2017, 05:23:57 pm by JohnnoWhite »
There is nothing wrong with striving to win, so long as you don't set the prize above the game. There can be no dishonour in defeat nor any conceit in victory. What matters above all is that the team plays in the right spirit, with skill, courage, fair play,no favour and the result accepted without bitterness. Sir Matt Busby CBE KCSG 1909-1994

Offline Zeb

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 18,571
  • Justice.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6387 on: May 1, 2017, 03:35:15 pm »
He isn't?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnJem92ElK0

I really like him, but as he says in that video (and still holds true 6 months later) he still needs time as an MP let alone being given a shadow portfolio. If Labour can get him and the likes of Nandy and Reeves pulling in the same direction then there's a lot of hope for the future of the party. It will mean compromises from the hard left on a number of things if they're serious about governing and bringing in other progressives and centrists to support that government. But it can be done. That's the hopeful thing heading into this clusterfucked election.
"And the voices of the standing Kop still whispering in the wind will salute the wee Scots redman and he will still walk on.
And your money will have bought you nothing."

Offline Robinred

  • Wanted for burglary.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,759
  • Red since '64
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6388 on: May 1, 2017, 04:50:24 pm »
I really like him, but as he says in that video (and still holds true 6 months later) he still needs time as an MP let alone being given a shadow portfolio. If Labour can get him and the likes of Nandy and Reeves pulling in the same direction then there's a lot of hope for the future of the party. It will mean compromises from the hard left on a number of things if they're serious about governing and bringing in other progressives and centrists to support that government. But it can be done. That's the hopeful thing heading into this clusterfucked election.

I agree. I like him too. There's actually a good deal of talent in the PLP. And a number of MPs who'd make a better leader than Corbyn.
"The first revolt is against the supreme tyranny of theology...as long as we have a master in heaven, we will be slaves on earth." Mikhail Bakunin

Offline Libertine

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,501
  • Nothing behind me, everything ahead of me
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6389 on: May 1, 2017, 05:14:18 pm »

Offline JackWard33

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 26,009
  • President of the Harry Wilson fanclub
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6390 on: May 1, 2017, 05:23:22 pm »
Wow, R2 at 0.97, pretty much a perfect correlation.
Even though we dont have a presedential democracy, it's hard to argue that most people don't vote that way.

Amazing isn't it ? The analysts that called the 2015 Tory win were looking at this not the opinion polls

Offline Sangria

  • In trying to be right ends up wrong without fail
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 19,113
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6391 on: May 1, 2017, 06:40:56 pm »
Would you look at this......

https://twitter.com/labour_history/status/858903799976546304

 :'(
Quote
We voted for an end to Thatcherism and got even more of it.

This is the kind of thinking that's got us into this current situation. Out of the EU and the Tories about to win a landslide.
"i just dont think (Lucas is) that type of player that Kenny wants"
Vidocq, 20 January 2011

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=267148.msg8032258#msg8032258

Offline So… Howard Philips

  • Penile Toupé Extender. Notoriously work-shy, copper-bottomed pervert.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 23,146
  • All I want for Christmas is a half and half scarf
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6392 on: May 1, 2017, 06:54:18 pm »
This is the kind of thinking that's got us into this current situation. Out of the EU and the Tories about to win a landslide.

No doubt someone with a safe job, policy wonk or similar, and has never had personal experience of real Thatcherism. Politics is real life not a hobby but some of his type don't live in the real world.

Offline Cliff Bastin

  • Big Exeter fan, pretending to be a gooner, pretending...yawn
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,444
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6393 on: May 1, 2017, 06:54:53 pm »
John McDonnell speaks at an event in Trafalgar square with a Joseph Stalin banner in attendance. You have to laugh really. Should have brought a Hitler one along too.

Offline So… Howard Philips

  • Penile Toupé Extender. Notoriously work-shy, copper-bottomed pervert.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 23,146
  • All I want for Christmas is a half and half scarf
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6394 on: May 1, 2017, 06:56:37 pm »
John McDonnell speaks at an event in Trafalgar square with a Joseph Stalin banner in attendance. You have to laugh really. Should have brought a Hitler one along too.

But Uncle Joe smoked a pipe so he was OK.

Offline Red Beret

  • Yellow Beret. Wants to sit in the Lobster Pot. Fat-fingered. Key. Boa. Rd. Kille. R. tonunlick! Soggy Knickers King. Bed-Exiting / Grunting / Bending Down / Cum Face Champion 2023.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 51,572
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6395 on: May 1, 2017, 07:50:19 pm »
I really like him, but as he says in that video (and still holds true 6 months later) he still needs time as an MP let alone being given a shadow portfolio. If Labour can get him and the likes of Nandy and Reeves pulling in the same direction then there's a lot of hope for the future of the party. It will mean compromises from the hard left on a number of things if they're serious about governing and bringing in other progressives and centrists to support that government. But it can be done. That's the hopeful thing heading into this clusterfucked election.

Well, THERE'S your problem.
I don't always visit Lobster Pot.  But when I do. I sit.

Popcorn's Art

Offline Zeb

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 18,571
  • Justice.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6396 on: May 1, 2017, 09:07:37 pm »
Well, THERE'S your problem.

There were a few MPs I respect who cited that realising Corbyn had no intention of taking advice outside his closed circle was the breaking point. Most nowhere close to being 'Blairite' either. Lewis may have more nouse about him if that interview wasn't just platitudes about a mythical progressive alliance and, instead, he sees the value of having a pragmatic broad tent which could work with the Liberals, the Greens, the SNP and PC.
"And the voices of the standing Kop still whispering in the wind will salute the wee Scots redman and he will still walk on.
And your money will have bought you nothing."

Offline TravisBickle

  • KnowsVotersAreFickle!
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,808
  • RAWK n' Roll
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6397 on: May 1, 2017, 10:00:18 pm »
Just listened and uncontrollably seethed to yesterday's Andrew Marr interview with that thing Teresa May. 

They MUST be binned - or we all of us descend into a savagery the like of which very few Brits alive today will ever have witnessed. Please don't ever say that you as a voter weren't warned or you didn't think it would be like this when you voted for "strong and stable" government.

What a Tory farce!! Strong is easy to spout about when you constantly punish the impoverished and defenceless weak.
There was a time even under the Tories when such policies would have been branded tyrannical and barbaric but with this current brand of Tory "things" running the country, anything that grinds our people further down the social ladder is hailed as strong and stable leadership.
What's even worse is when a government KNOWS that what it is prepared to inflict on the people is the absolute antithesis of what common decency demands it OUGHT to be doing and would be doing had they ANY scrap of moral integrity in their genes.

Real strength of leadership in any so-called civilised society is when a government refuses to compromise on delivering basic humanity to the most vulnerable of its people. I totally reject this constant Tory abuse of the language; I reject their sickening ideology and I deplore this wilful assault on our people. They are smirking gutter scum dressed up in expensive suits that would clothe and feed a desperately impoverished family for a month.

These Tories are criminally responsible for the decline of justice and hope in this dis-United Kingdom. Were there ANY real and meaningful justice, they would ALL of them sitting on their upholstered arses in the Commons be charged with the worst of crimes against OUR nation, consigned to jail and banned from ever holding any political office again.

 The sort of savagery the USSR was responsible for, Jonno? Yer man Johnny Mac was giving a speech under a hammer and sickle flag today. Or what about the sort of savagery the Baathists were and continue to be responsible for? That flag was draped above his head as well. We know what your (entirely) justified reaction would be if Phillip Hammond was speaking at a rally in front of a Nazi flag. What's the difference?

 Honestly, you talk about locking the Tories up whilst John McDonnell is pulling those stunts and wonder why people call us the "loony left."
« Last Edit: May 1, 2017, 10:03:46 pm by TravisBickle »
"My idea was to build Liverpool into a bastion of invincibility. Napoleon had that idea and he conquered the bloody world! And that's what I wanted; for Liverpool to be untouchable. My idea was to build Liverpool up and up and up until eventually everyone would have to submit and give in."

Offline Elmo!

  • Spolier alret!
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 13,443
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6398 on: May 1, 2017, 10:45:46 pm »
This is probably going to piss all of you off on both sides of the debate but hopefully will get a laugh or two....

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x5kcaga_jeremy-bernard-corbyn-what-was-done_fun

Enjoy!  ;D

Offline The Gulleysucker

  • RAWK's very own spinached up Popeye. Transfer Board Veteran 5 Stars.
  • RAWK Remembers
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 11,496
  • An Indolent Sybarite
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6399 on: May 1, 2017, 11:41:04 pm »


It started off ok, then sloped off quite a bit, but this little construct below was quite clever if only because of the obvious homage to the White House death of Bin Laden photo moment....

Not sure what the white horse prancing to the left amid the wind farm in the final scene is about though.


I don't do polite so fuck yoursalf with your stupid accusations...

Right you fuckwit I will show you why you are talking out of your fat arse...

Mutton Geoff (Obviously a real nice guy)