Author Topic: The Labour Party (*)  (Read 884331 times)

Offline TepidT2O

  • Deffo NOT 9"! MUFC bedwetter. Grass. Folically-challenged, God-piece-wearing, monkey-rubber. Jizz aroma expert. Operating at the lower end of the distribution curve...has the hots for Alan. Bastard. Fearless in transfer windows with lack of convicti
  • Lead Matchday Commentator
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 94,343
  • Dejan Lovren fan club member #1
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6040 on: April 23, 2017, 10:24:37 am »
Corbyn has one interview with Marr and the next headline to come through on my news feed is 'Corbyn would not authorise the killing of ISIS leader'.

To be fair to say he said it would be helpful that the ISIS leader wasnt around but its a shite way to answer the question. Just emphasise that you would authorise a strike on the ISIS leader, dont get on your soap box over the pros and cons of drone strikes.
The hardline of one of the papers I saw in the shop this morning was similar. Corbyn soft on terrorists, that sort of thing.

Plays on people's fears effectively.

Anyway, he was going on about his Brexit position and it seems to be exactly the same as May's
“Happiness can be found in the darkest of times, if one only remembers to turn on the light.”
“Generosity always pays off. Generosity in your effort, in your work, in your kindness, in the way you look after people and take care of people. In the long run, if you are generous with a heart, and with humanity, it always pays off.”
W

Offline classycarra

  • The Left Disonourable Chuntering Member For Scousepool.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 30,507
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6041 on: April 23, 2017, 10:40:15 am »
Corbyn has one interview with Marr and the next headline to come through on my news feed is 'Corbyn would not authorise the killing of ISIS leader'.

To be fair to say he said it would be helpful that the ISIS leader wasnt around but its a shite way to answer the question. Just emphasise that you would authorise a strike on the ISIS leader, dont get on your soap box over the pros and cons of drone strikes.

I think you overestimate his analytical skills.

Newstatesman on his Marr interview:
Quote
Corbyn: "I'm no supporter or defender of Isis in any way." Not a great clarification to have to make

I hope the weekday off in lieu he's earned is worth it for this disasterous media appearance he's deigned to provide

Offline alonsoisared

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,699
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6042 on: April 23, 2017, 10:48:26 am »
Hahaha never thought id see such pissing and moaning over 4 extra bank holidays. "Oh but its shit months to have a day off, the weather will be shit." Its the UK for christ sake, the weathers always shit. People work enough as it is, this is a nice little bonus for those hard working people, the vast majority of which couldnt give a fuck what time of year it is, its just a day off work. What a thing to get worked up about.

Dont worry folks the way the polls are looking and with you lot set to sulk off to the lib dems youll get your wish of seeing labour decimated. High five!
« Last Edit: April 23, 2017, 10:50:15 am by alonsoisared »

Offline SP

  • Thor ain't got shit on this dude! Alpheus. SPoogle. The Equusfluminis Of RAWK. Straight in at the deep end with a tube of Vagisil. Needs to get a half-life. Needs a damned good de-frag.
  • RAWK Staff.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 36,044
  • .
  • Super Title: Southern Pansy
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6043 on: April 23, 2017, 10:59:48 am »
If you are self employed or paid by the hour it does nothing for you. Many people have contracts that would mean they get no extra holiday, just lose the ability to choose when to take them. It will cost businesses about 2% of their annual labour. That will impact on turnover.  Decreases in turnover have a larger impact on profit, as most costs are relatively fixed. Less profit, less tax revenue, less money available for wage negotiations. Ultimately, the workers will pay for this.

This is a popularise policy for an industrial workforce that barely exists any more. It is more evidence that Corbyn's view of the workplace was formed in the 60s and 70s and has not moved since. The world of work has changed since then, not that he knows, it is not as if he has ever had a job.

Offline classycarra

  • The Left Disonourable Chuntering Member For Scousepool.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 30,507
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6044 on: April 23, 2017, 11:05:23 am »
Hahaha never thought id see such pissing and moaning over 4 extra bank holidays. "Oh but its shit months to have a day off, the weather will be shit." Its the UK for christ sake, the weathers always shit. People work enough as it is, this is a nice little bonus for those hard working people, the vast majority of which couldnt give a fuck what time of year it is, its just a day off work. What a thing to get worked up about.

Dont worry folks the way the polls are looking and with you lot set to sulk off to the lib dems youll get your wish of seeing labour decimated. High five!

Looks like you've given it even less thought than the Leader's office, and to top it off have added in some ire at those who have - just because we prefer our party to come up with good ideas.

Only one person mentioned in this conversation wants Labour decimated, and that's Corbyn

Offline alonsoisared

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,699
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6045 on: April 23, 2017, 11:12:12 am »
Well great then lets fuck bank holidays off completely so we dont upset self employed people.

Im living in Spain currently, 2 months ago they announced an extra bank holiday for fathers day with about a months notice as Madrid was one bank holiday short for the year. I didnt hear anyone moan about an extra day off and as i sat on the train back from seville, which with the extra day it was worth a cheap and cheerful little trip to, i can assure you there were no tears from fellow passengers about any potential little knock on effects on the economy or if a few self employed people might be upset. Work life balance is a major issue in the UK which i can see even more in my few months here so far, i just cannot see the point in complaining about 4 more days off.

We could be talking about the torys dismantling the NHS and patients dying in corridors waiting for a bed, and how Labour can turn that around. But no lets complain about a few days off work.

Offline Zeb

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 18,571
  • Justice.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6046 on: April 23, 2017, 11:18:53 am »
We could be talking about the torys dismantling the NHS and patients dying in corridors waiting for a bed, and how Labour can turn that around. But no lets complain about a few days off work.

Make your mind up mate. Either it's a super idea which Labour should be opening up its General Election campaign with, or it's not. Corbyn's brains trust have decided it's what they want to push this weekend.
« Last Edit: April 23, 2017, 11:20:35 am by Zeb »
"And the voices of the standing Kop still whispering in the wind will salute the wee Scots redman and he will still walk on.
And your money will have bought you nothing."

Offline CornerFlag

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,650
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6047 on: April 23, 2017, 11:22:21 am »
The BBC's summary of that interview:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39683989

Quote
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said he wants a "different" kind of country and would end "business as usual" in domestic and foreign policies.

He said he would not launch a "first strike" nuclear attack and suggested the party's policy on the UK's Trident nuclear deterrent was not settled.

He told Andrew Marr he was "fed up" with inequality and under-investment.

He said he also said he would like to scrap grammar schools and would phase out private contracts in the NHS.

Asked whether Labour would commit to renewing the current nuclear weapons system - which has been its policy for decades but which he opposes - he said the party's manifesto had not yet been agreed.

While he supported Nato and wanted to boost the UK's armed forces, he said he would be seeking a better relationship with Russia and opposed any further air strikes in Syria and Iraq.

And on whether he would approve a potential drone strike to kill the leader of the so-called Islamic State group, he said it would "be helpful if he was not around" but he would first want to see the intelligence available and understand what a move would achieve in terms of ending the conflict in Syria.

In a wide-ranging interview, he said he wanted to use the power of the government to improve housing and education.

He also acknowledged that the free movement of European citizens into the UK would end after Brexit as it was an "instrinsic" feature of EU membership.

Asked about whether he would insist on ending free movement if he was PM, Mr Corbyn said he would "insist on trade access and see what follows from that".

But he also rejected claims that his stance on Brexit was indistinguishable from Theresa May's, saying he was seeking an "intelligent" relationship based on tariff-free access to the single market.

Asked whether he believed he could win the snap 8 June poll, he replied "watch this space".

Guessing the whole thing will be up later on their site.
My Twitter

Last time I went there I saw masturbating chimpanzees. Whether you think that's worthy of Ł22 is up to you. All I'll say is I now have an annual pass.

Offline classycarra

  • The Left Disonourable Chuntering Member For Scousepool.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 30,507
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6048 on: April 23, 2017, 11:23:08 am »
Well great then lets fuck bank holidays off completely so we dont upset self employed people.

Im living in Spain currently, 2 months ago they announced an extra bank holiday for fathers day with about a months notice as Madrid was one bank holiday short for the year. I didnt hear anyone moan about an extra day off and as i sat on the train back from seville, which with the extra day it was worth a cheap and cheerful little trip to, i can assure you there were no tears from fellow passengers about any potential little knock on effects on the economy or if a few self employed people might be upset. Work life balance is a major issue in the UK which i can see even more in my few months here so far, i just cannot see the point in complaining about 4 more days off.

We could be talking about the torys dismantling the NHS and patients dying in corridors waiting for a bed, and how Labour can turn that around. But no lets complain about a few days off work.

Sorry, but you're losing track of what you criticised us for.

Suggesting any of us want all bank holidays fucked off isn't exactly a mature response, is it? It's just lashing out exaggeration instead of making an argument.

You're working on the assumption that it is four extra days of paid holiday for everyone, which is not necessarily the case at all, it's simply making those four days public holidays. If it was four guaranteed extra statutory minimum holiday days, they would have included that in their brief summary (you'd expect, despite their incompetence).

As for the lack of complaints on your train anecdote, what is your point? Is that representative of all of Spain? Did you canvass the opinions of self employed/freelance residents?

Go ahead and talk about how Labour can improve the NHS - noone is stopping you. It would be good to hear some proposals from Labour about that, so we have something to discsuss. The first Sunday media of an election campaign and the Leader's office want the press to focus on this back of a napkin 'policy', that's not my fault. Likewise, we can continue to talk about this holiday proposal despite you not wanting us to.

To me the proposla just looks like a platitude they hoped everyone would lap up as a good news suggestion, without giving much thought
« Last Edit: April 23, 2017, 11:24:44 am by Classycara »

Offline alonsoisared

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,699
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6049 on: April 23, 2017, 11:25:09 am »
Make your mind up mate. Either it's a super idea which Labour should be opening up its General Election campaign with, or it's not. Corbyn's brains trust have decided it's what they want to push this weekend.
what are you on about? I think its a good idea, did i not make that clear? not a massive game changer but something you dont complain about unless you have an agenda to complain about absolutely everything corbyn says.

Offline Zeb

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 18,571
  • Justice.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6050 on: April 23, 2017, 11:28:29 am »
what are you on about? I think its a good idea, did i not make that clear? not a massive game changer but something you dont complain about unless you have an agenda to complain about absolutely everything corbyn says.

You're whinging that people are critiquing the Bank Holiday idea by saying we're not talking about the NHS. It's like you're living in Spain totally unaware that this is what Corbyn and his team are pushing as Labour's big idea for the start of the General Election.
"And the voices of the standing Kop still whispering in the wind will salute the wee Scots redman and he will still walk on.
And your money will have bought you nothing."

Offline cloggypop

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,308
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6051 on: April 23, 2017, 11:42:35 am »
Make your mind up mate. Either it's a super idea which Labour should be opening up its General Election campaign with, or it's not. Corbyn's brains trust have decided it's what they want to push this weekend.
It's St George's Day.

Offline Zeb

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 18,571
  • Justice.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6052 on: April 23, 2017, 11:51:17 am »
It's St George's Day.

I'm not sure St.George gets to vote.
"And the voices of the standing Kop still whispering in the wind will salute the wee Scots redman and he will still walk on.
And your money will have bought you nothing."

Offline cloggypop

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,308
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6053 on: April 23, 2017, 11:51:56 am »
I'm not sure St.George gets to vote.
People who want a patriotic piss up do.

Offline TepidT2O

  • Deffo NOT 9"! MUFC bedwetter. Grass. Folically-challenged, God-piece-wearing, monkey-rubber. Jizz aroma expert. Operating at the lower end of the distribution curve...has the hots for Alan. Bastard. Fearless in transfer windows with lack of convicti
  • Lead Matchday Commentator
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 94,343
  • Dejan Lovren fan club member #1
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6054 on: April 23, 2017, 11:52:00 am »
Make your mind up mate. Either it's a super idea which Labour should be opening up its General Election campaign with, or it's not. Corbyn's brains trust have decided it's what they want to push this weekend.
It's meh.

It's not a policy that's going to sway anyone really, but it would be nice to have
“Happiness can be found in the darkest of times, if one only remembers to turn on the light.”
“Generosity always pays off. Generosity in your effort, in your work, in your kindness, in the way you look after people and take care of people. In the long run, if you are generous with a heart, and with humanity, it always pays off.”
W

Offline zero zero

  • Karma's a bitch. Innit.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 15,543
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6055 on: April 23, 2017, 11:53:12 am »
Quote
And on whether he would approve a potential drone strike to kill the leader of the so-called Islamic State group, he said it would "be helpful if he was not around" but he would first want to see the intelligence available and understand what a move would achieve in terms of ending the conflict in Syria.
Jeremy Corbyn: Hard as nails but soft on terrorism. That's not media spin, it's plain to see in his response. Why can't he just say "Yes" to this simple question. Marr is not trying to trip him up. This is a gimme of a question. Is it all his ideological baggage? It's this sort of thing that has Labour voters thinking May would make a better PM. Corbyn doesn't even seem to be aware that as PM it might be part of his job to make sure "he was not around".

Offline Zeb

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 18,571
  • Justice.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6056 on: April 23, 2017, 12:01:05 pm »
People who want a patriotic piss up do.

Patriotic Piss-Ups For All (Which Aren't Called St.Patrick's Day). We've already spent longer thinking about this policy than Jeremy's team have.
"And the voices of the standing Kop still whispering in the wind will salute the wee Scots redman and he will still walk on.
And your money will have bought you nothing."

Offline Zeb

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 18,571
  • Justice.
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6057 on: April 23, 2017, 12:16:53 pm »
It's meh.

It's not a policy that's going to sway anyone really, but it would be nice to have

I don't mind the policy. I think it's meaningless symbolism more than anything, but whatever. Just can't criticise people for discussing it over what many would consider bigger issues when the main message to come out of Labour having the headlines today is that Corbyn can't stop equivocating and "let's have more bank holidays". Good opportunity to have a strong and coherent message come through today and it's frittered away once more. The whole campaign is going to be like this. The past 18 months has been like this. But I still get irritated by it. Labour should be talking foodbanks and poverty, homelessness and health, etc etc etc. Not patriotic piss-ups and Corbyn tying himself up in knots over terrorism again.
"And the voices of the standing Kop still whispering in the wind will salute the wee Scots redman and he will still walk on.
And your money will have bought you nothing."

Online oldfordie

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,451
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6058 on: April 23, 2017, 12:18:15 pm »
Jeremy Corbyn: Hard as nails but soft on terrorism. That's not media spin, it's plain to see in his response. Why can't he just say "Yes" to this simple question. Marr is not trying to trip him up. This is a gimme of a question. Is it all his ideological baggage? It's this sort of thing that has Labour voters thinking May would make a better PM. Corbyn doesn't even seem to be aware that as PM it might be part of his job to make sure "he was not around".
Whats the point of killing an ISIS leader. is it possible to give a more absurd reply. he makes no effort to deflect awkward questions. the answer is I would question the legality of the strike, do I want to drag the UK into a another bloody conflict. next questions will be about Trident and sending UK troops to defend this country. principles can be very expensive and if your willing to pay the price for sticking to your principles then you deserve respect. I wont give any respect for someone who is so pig headed he has to answer every question as if he's been given a truth drug, he must know his views will put off off millions of voters. if he thinks they will win votes then why does he get angry when questioned on defense.
It might take our producers five minutes to find 60 economists who feared Brexit and five hours to find a sole voice who espoused it.
“But by the time we went on air we simply had one of each; we presented this unequal effort to our audience as balance. It wasn’t.”
               Emily Maitlis

Offline Sangria

  • In trying to be right ends up wrong without fail
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 19,113
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6059 on: April 23, 2017, 12:26:42 pm »
People who want a patriotic piss up do.

People who want a patriotic piss up do so in June. That's when the international football tournaments take place. Of course, that assumes England qualifies for those tournaments.
"i just dont think (Lucas is) that type of player that Kenny wants"
Vidocq, 20 January 2011

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=267148.msg8032258#msg8032258

Offline cloggypop

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,308
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6060 on: April 23, 2017, 12:28:03 pm »
People who want a patriotic piss up do so in June. That's when the international football tournaments take place. Of course, that assumes England qualifies for those tournaments.
It's St George's Day. They would love St George's Day off.

Offline Sangria

  • In trying to be right ends up wrong without fail
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 19,113
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6061 on: April 23, 2017, 12:34:56 pm »
It's St George's Day. They would love St George's Day off.

If my experience is any guide, they'd love an extra day of paid leave, but they'd like to choose when it is. August is the most popular period for leave, due to the weather, resulting in extra competition for that period. I prefer to have consecutive days off, so I pick less popular periods of the year.
"i just dont think (Lucas is) that type of player that Kenny wants"
Vidocq, 20 January 2011

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=267148.msg8032258#msg8032258

Offline cloggypop

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,308
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6062 on: April 23, 2017, 12:40:53 pm »
If my experience is any guide, they'd love an extra day of paid leave, but they'd like to choose when it is. August is the most popular period for leave, due to the weather, resulting in extra competition for that period. I prefer to have consecutive days off, so I pick less popular periods of the year.
I would assume Labour mean extra additional days off.

The particularly English one is around the same time as Koningsdag in the Netherlands. It's immensely popular. People generally love a day off.

Offline zero zero

  • Karma's a bitch. Innit.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 15,543
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6063 on: April 23, 2017, 12:55:10 pm »
I wont give any respect for someone who is so pig headed he has to answer every question as if he's been given a truth drug, he must know his views will put off off millions of voters.
Ha! Corbyn does not recognise that what he says will be used as headlines. And for a man who's been married three times, Corbyn seems oblivious to the idea that his answers may be used in evidence months or years down the line.

Offline Lush is the best medicine...

  • FUCK THE POLICE - NWA
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 40,806
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6064 on: April 23, 2017, 01:43:22 pm »
I would assume Labour mean extra additional days off.
maybe he could have just said that?

Offline cloggypop

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,308
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6065 on: April 23, 2017, 01:47:51 pm »
maybe he could have just said that?
"After seven years of painful austerity, our workers deserve a break – and under a Labour government, they will have the opportunity of four more days off a year."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-labour-bank-holidays-general-election-2017-a7697296.html

Online oldfordie

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,451
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6066 on: April 23, 2017, 02:02:16 pm »
"After seven years of painful austerity, our workers deserve a break – and under a Labour government, they will have the opportunity of four more days off a year."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-labour-bank-holidays-general-election-2017-a7697296.html
Frottage wants June 23th made into a national holiday as well. might as well add that one to the list as well.
It might take our producers five minutes to find 60 economists who feared Brexit and five hours to find a sole voice who espoused it.
“But by the time we went on air we simply had one of each; we presented this unequal effort to our audience as balance. It wasn’t.”
               Emily Maitlis

Offline cloggypop

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,308
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6067 on: April 23, 2017, 02:06:13 pm »
Frottage wants June 23th made into a national holiday as well. might as well add that one to the list as well.
He can do one with his independence day shite but a national holiday for Alan Turing's birthday I could get behind. Days off are boss.

Online oldfordie

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,451
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6068 on: April 23, 2017, 02:16:10 pm »
He can do one with his independence day shite but a national holiday for Alan Turing's birthday I could get behind. Days off are boss.
I don't think you will get any arguments from Corbyn on that one. :)
It might take our producers five minutes to find 60 economists who feared Brexit and five hours to find a sole voice who espoused it.
“But by the time we went on air we simply had one of each; we presented this unequal effort to our audience as balance. It wasn’t.”
               Emily Maitlis

Offline Lush is the best medicine...

  • FUCK THE POLICE - NWA
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 40,806
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6069 on: April 23, 2017, 02:18:14 pm »
"After seven years of painful austerity, our workers deserve a break – and under a Labour government, they will have the opportunity of four more days off a year."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-labour-bank-holidays-general-election-2017-a7697296.html
so once he gets rid of austerity is there any need for these extra holidays?

Offline Lush is the best medicine...

  • FUCK THE POLICE - NWA
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 40,806
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6070 on: April 23, 2017, 02:19:51 pm »
I don't think you will get any arguments from Corbyn on that one. :)
surprised he hasn't tried to push a 4 day working week but working more hours during time..g 4 10 hour days rather than 5 8 hour days, or at least give employees that option. Now that would help a decent number of people.

Online oldfordie

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,451
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6071 on: April 23, 2017, 02:26:00 pm »
surprised he hasn't tried to push a 4 day working week but working more hours during time..g 4 10 hour days rather than 5 8 hour days, or at least give employees that option. Now that would help a decent number of people.
Companys have that option now if they want, I worked similar 2 shift pattern for years,liked it as well. problem is some companys work 3 shifts 24 hrs a day so it would create big problems for them.
I think Labour have to leave out the words 4 day week, it will backfire big time.
It might take our producers five minutes to find 60 economists who feared Brexit and five hours to find a sole voice who espoused it.
“But by the time we went on air we simply had one of each; we presented this unequal effort to our audience as balance. It wasn’t.”
               Emily Maitlis

Offline Lush is the best medicine...

  • FUCK THE POLICE - NWA
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 40,806
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6072 on: April 23, 2017, 02:29:22 pm »
Companys have that option now if they want, I worked similar 2 shift pattern for years,liked it as well. problem is some companys work 3 shifts 24 hrs a day so it would create big problems for them.
I think Labour have to leave out the words 4 day week, it will backfire big time.
staff don't though - thinking more for people who can work from home/offices open from 7 to 7/24 hour access, extension to the flexi time. Know a good few people who'd happily do that, sell it more an option.

Yeah it'd probably not sound great when his work patterns are brought up, but will probably help t

Online oldfordie

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,451
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6073 on: April 23, 2017, 02:33:33 pm »
staff don't though - thinking more for people who can work from home/offices open from 7 to 7/24 hour access, extension to the flexi time. Know a good few people who'd happily do that, sell it more an option.

Yeah it'd probably not sound great when his work patterns are brought up, but will probably help t
I think it actually makes sense to work 4 10hr shifts rather than 5 8 hr shifts if it can be done, saves a lot of money for a company in operating costs. also saves workers travel costs.
It might take our producers five minutes to find 60 economists who feared Brexit and five hours to find a sole voice who espoused it.
“But by the time we went on air we simply had one of each; we presented this unequal effort to our audience as balance. It wasn’t.”
               Emily Maitlis

Offline Lush is the best medicine...

  • FUCK THE POLICE - NWA
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 40,806
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6074 on: April 23, 2017, 02:53:04 pm »
I think it actually makes sense to work 4 10hr shifts rather than 5 8 hr shifts if it can be done, saves a lot of money for a company in operating costs. also saves workers travel costs.
also it'll reduce demand on the railways, which makes it cheaper to buy them back!

Online oldfordie

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,451
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6075 on: April 23, 2017, 03:07:04 pm »
also it'll reduce demand on the railways, which makes it cheaper to buy them back!
Yeah. it saves money in many ways. the bank holidays were nice but I enjoyed the right to have extra days off with pay whenever I wanted. had to give notice in most cases as it shouldn't effect production. solves many personal problems as it's hard to get things done working 9 to 5 ,5 days a week.
It might take our producers five minutes to find 60 economists who feared Brexit and five hours to find a sole voice who espoused it.
“But by the time we went on air we simply had one of each; we presented this unequal effort to our audience as balance. It wasn’t.”
               Emily Maitlis

Offline SP

  • Thor ain't got shit on this dude! Alpheus. SPoogle. The Equusfluminis Of RAWK. Straight in at the deep end with a tube of Vagisil. Needs to get a half-life. Needs a damned good de-frag.
  • RAWK Staff.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 36,044
  • .
  • Super Title: Southern Pansy
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6076 on: April 23, 2017, 03:11:47 pm »
surprised he hasn't tried to push a 4 day working week but working more hours during time..g 4 10 hour days rather than 5 8 hour days, or at least give employees that option. Now that would help a decent number of people.

But that is not really a government's job to push. Some Employers already do offer that kind of deal. They tend to have happier, well motivated, more loyal staff. It is good management, but not an area for government.

I suppose they could encourage more creative split season tickets for rail travel. I spent a time working 3 days a week in London, and the rest in a drivable to office.  Cost a fortune, no season ticket benefit at all.

Offline Lush is the best medicine...

  • FUCK THE POLICE - NWA
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 40,806
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6077 on: April 23, 2017, 03:13:54 pm »
I suppose they could encourage more creative split season tickets for rail travel. I spent a time working 3 days a week in London, and the rest in a drivable to office.  Cost a fortune, no season ticket benefit at all.
a national Oyster card type scheme?

Offline redmark

  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 21,395
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6078 on: April 23, 2017, 03:15:34 pm »
Hahaha never thought id see such pissing and moaning over 4 extra bank holidays. "Oh but its shit months to have a day off, the weather will be shit." Its the UK for christ sake, the weathers always shit. People work enough as it is, this is a nice little bonus for those hard working people, the vast majority of which couldnt give a fuck what time of year it is, its just a day off work. What a thing to get worked up about.

Dont worry folks the way the polls are looking and with you lot set to sulk off to the lib dems youll get your wish of seeing labour decimated. High five!

I've not posted on it, I'm certainly not worked up about it - and as I'm in a job which doesn't deduct it from my entitlement (and I get pretty generous holidays compared to some in this thread), it would be good for me.

But it barely qualifies as a 'policy', does it? Where's the narrative and the range of coherent policy ideas? What exactly has Corbyn done for two years?

(It's a rhetorical question. The focus of Corbyn and his backers has been on changes to party rules, to cement the left's control of the party machinery. Not policy.)
Stop whining : https://spiritofshankly.com/ : https://thefsa.org.uk/join/ : https://reclaimourgame.com/
The focus now should not be on who the owners are, but limits on what owners can do without formal supporter agreement. At all clubs.

Offline Alan_X

  • WUM. 'twatito' - The Cat Herding Firm But Fair Voice Of Reason (Except when he's got a plank up his arse). Gimme some skin, priest! Has a general dislike for Elijah Wood. Clearly cannot fill even a thong! RAWK Resident Muppet. Has a crush o
  • RAWK Staff
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 53,392
  • Come on you fucking red men!!!
  • Super Title: This is super!
Re: The Labour Party (*)
« Reply #6079 on: April 23, 2017, 03:25:30 pm »
March, April and November are shit months for Bank Holidays. The weather is likely to be shite.

We would end up with 5 public holidays in March and April when you add in Easter.

Either this comes out of annual leave, so the net effect is that many workers lose flexibility on 4 days off, or it is additional time off.

260 working  days in the year. Less 20 days leave. Less 8 bank holidays. 232 days. 4 days off is nearly 2% of time. Who pays for that? 

This and all the other comments. Five bank holidays in March and April would be a pain. If it's about giving 'workers' a break why not spread them out more?

And also:

France observes 11 French public holidays each year, however, only May Day is classed as a statutory (paid) holiday in France; the entitlement to other paid French holidays and the conditions for working on French national holidays (such as higher pay) are left to the discretion of the employer-employee contract or union, so check the French holiday calendar when looking for jobs in France.

So it's 11 not 12 in France and a quick search shows that only one is statutory.
Sid Lowe (@sidlowe)
09/03/2011 08:04
Give a man a mask and he will tell the truth, Give a man a user name and he will act like a total twat.
Its all about winning shiny things.