This is interesting (for 'interesting' read 'really boring unless you're a sports design dork'.)
Our new home shirt is cut on an identical pattern to the Randers FC home shirt.
http://maillotfoot10.11.over-blog.com/article-randers-fc-warrior-home-kit-2013-113708853.html The only difference is the collar: the bottom of our collar is cut like a conventional round neck to give its white detail that fetching vampire teeth effect that one so naturally associates with the Liverpool of Shankly, Paisley and Dalglish.
Our new away shirt is cut on an identical pattern to the Sagan Tosu away and third kits.
http://todosobrecamisetas.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/sagan-tosu-warrior-uniforms-2013.html We have a narrow piece of fabric to connect the chest and the shoulder/side panels, giving our away kit that 'apron that someone's been sick down' effect — but otherwise it's the same, I think.
Our third kit I think is uniquely awful, but perhaps it doesn't look like three kits sewn together when you wear it.
The more I think about it, the less I understand what Warrior are trying to do, product wise. It's like they have three different design teams all trying to meet the demands of a fifteen-year-old head of marketing, himself following strategy directives from a board who've never been to a football match.
