So it comes down to the 34-year old Carragher being "massively experienced" and "fit and rested" (didn't see Coates playing 45 mins on Sunday) not to mention a "massive game". Absolutely no misplaced nostalgic reverence at all is there?
Oops I almost forgot, Coates is "inexperienced", not quite true but a bit 'chicken and egg' scenario and doesn't account for the fact that he's played in matches much more high pressure than this (Copa America Final).
As I suspected from you, no footballing logic whatsoever. You don't address the very valid concerns of how we play when Carragher is in the team, nor the inexplicable switching of Skrtel to the left to accommodate him. Not surprising given he's another of your Teflon-coated heroes.
Don't resort to your old tactics of being selective in what you quote, I also said he is "still a good player" and "has looked good when called upon in the last few months". There is nothing nostalgic about that, no. And after 45 minutes a week previously he is still going to be fit and rested, clearly.
Coates is inexperienced in the Premiership. FACT. He doesn't have much experience playing for Liverpool or with our players. FACT.
I don't know why I even bother replying to your venom-laced posts. Why do you behave like such a dick on here and respond with insults like that? I'm happy to explain further that I think the benefits of Carragher's qualities compared to Coates outweigh the concerns of us having to drop deeper in defence, or that I think it makes sense if you have two players, one ageing and the other at his peak, to have the defender at his peak play in the position that allows the ageing player to play in his favoured position and helps mask some of the ageing players faults.
You may not agree, but there is no need to resort to attacking me rather than what I say. I hoped in recent times we were past all this squabbling. Obviously not.