I mean when you’ve got Paul Joyce quoting specific numbers you’re on pretty firm ground - not sure why you feel the need to pretend this is some sort of mystery
Do I detect a hushed note of awe when Joyce is mentioned?
I think I was pretty clear in the last post and anyway I don't proposing to go on and on about it.
Though I should add that I don't actually have any skin in this game. I couldn't actually give a stuff what Mo is being paid, nor whether it breaks a wage structure or not. I trust the club these days not to drunken sailor its way into bankruptcy and it ain't my money.
It's true that, separate from any individidual's case, I have concerns about the amount of money sloshing about the game and the negative influences and impacts of it (there are positive ones as well) but that's a general state issue and not one restructed to any individual.
What I don't like is the way discussions between people who don't have the facts can often result in consensuses which kind of become 'established facts' even though no one involved in forming them know anything for certain, whereas those who do know the facts, are not involved. It's an abhored vacuum situation, but it shouldn't be, is my point. Of course that, too, is a general issue not just restricted to wage discussions, but is momentarily pertinent.
Anyway, another golden boot incoming for Mo, for certain (lol)