Hunt 69, Keegan 77, Rush 87, Fowler 2001, Owen 2004, Torres 2011, erm....
They were supposedly "irreplaceable"?
"We go again" indeed..
interesting when you look at the impacts of each leaving
hunt, fowler and torres all went out playing only partially in their last season, and not contributing significantly as a result
hunt was on the wane, as was the team as it lay in 5th in his final season, only improving a couple of seasons later
fowler had been supplanted by owen by the time he left, and contributed little in his final half season, although he did contribute his last full season....and we were I mproving in league position as he left and continued to improve
owen does not appear to have been missed at all, as our league position improved the season after he left, and continued to do so until torres arrived
torres left us in decline, and we did not improve until last season
so, whilst all of those players appeared to leave a massive hole, only fowler was immediately replaced (before he left in fact) but in no instance did our performance or prospects really suffer
keegan and rush left us at the top of their game and while we were on top
keegan left when we won the league and European cup, but was directly replaced by dalglish......and while we finished 2nd the following season, we won the European cup and then went on to dominate the league over the next decade
rush left when we finished second with everton on the up, and was directly replaced by Aldridge but with additions of Beardsley and barnes, and Houghton of course...the following season we won the league with a breathtaking season and should have won a double....
we have never suffered, certainly for a long time, due to a striker leaving........let's hope that is a trend to continue