You seem to be missing the point. We have a system on here in which it is incredibly easy to quote a persons post, you do that time and time again. I objected to you deliberately not doing that and instead putting something I didn't say in quotes and then replying to it.
I wasn't arsed quoting it the usual way, so I did it the way I did it. Sue me
The actual point is what you said was laughable to me. You keep harping on how it was quoted as if its taken out of context when it's clearly not and then you have cojones to say that I'm making things up?
"It is not Ramos and Madrid who have had their reputation tarnished it is Lovren, Croatia and Liverpool."
"I hoped he could of come without the baggage that badly damaged the reputation of the Club."
''Badly damaged the reputation of the club''
I'm making things up? Clearly am not, and you're moving the goalposts in your already bizarre arguement as it is.
Secondly tarnished and badly damaged simply aren't interchangeable terms. For me Lovren's actions after the game took some of the shine off a fantastic performance by Croatia. That is what tarnished means. In Football terms a great performance can be tarnished by an injury or unnecessary card late on.
So which one is it? Since you said he did both. I didn't realize you represented the entire nation of Croatia and what they all think about their win over Spain and their performance afterwards. And here I am foolish, having watched Croatian news and coverage of the game afterwards,the reaction,etc... and not coming away with the conclusion that Lovren tarnished their win. You don't have to explain to me what tarnished means and what it means in football terms, the fact of the matter is, this is clearly JUST your opinion and not the actual majority consensus about his comments which no one is arsed about other than you, and certainly the people in Croatia don't give a flying fuck about it nor did that have an impact on their performance or outcome today IN your world it did, hence why I said you live in an ALternative world/universe.
My views may be coloured by the fact that I was in Spain last week and saw how the reaction changed from Spanish people being complimentary about Croatia's performance to being negative about Lovren's post match actions.
So you formed a general consensus opinion for the entire world based on how Spanish people were reacting after their captain was being criticized and lambasted for being a dick all of his career? Imagine that, the opposition being bitter about what someone says about their own [captain] after a defeat. What a new concept that is. totally not an unbiased opinion, totally.
If you had said '' i didn't like what Lovren said after the match he shouldn't have done it'' and that was it, I wouldn't have batted an eye lid. But you went on to go into this rant on how Lovren will negatively impact our ability to achieve our objectives, how he is the TOP HEADLINE IN THE WORLD, how everyone else perceives Lovren as the number one dickhead in the game, that he's tarnished Croatia and this club,etc........
I, don't care what other people outside this club think about this club, or it's players or it's manager or the city for that matter. There are a lot of people that have a negative opinion about the club and the city, [and as a Liverpool supporter you should be well aware of what that is] but I am not arsed what anyone else thinks about the club the players and the city, when I can make up my own mind and see what the actual truth is myself.
I certainly don't care what the people of Spain think about Lovren, Croatia, or Liverpool Football club, or any other group of people who are not associated with Liverpool football club.
If you want to be bothered by it, be my guest.