Maybe I am being slightly dramatic - but if you take Nunez's 12 shots that have hit the woodwork, and say that half of them went in (not to mention any of the big chances he has actually missed) he would be on a goal involvement every 68 mins (if not better if you include some of the other big chances). In Ronaldo's 3 seasons in Serie A (a weaker league) he never got better than a goal involvement every 81 mins; in his last 3 seasons at Real Madrid he averaged worse than that also (and in his first) - and in the 5 in betweem his stats were massively inflated by penalties (if you take penalties out, then he averaged 70 mins per goal involvement or worse in 8 or his 9 seasons at Real Madrid, a time where he was winning Ballon D'Ors). So whilst you might think it crazy, he is pretty damn close this season to putting up Ronaldo numbers.
You are being incredibly dramatic and you must see football solely through a computer
I actually thought you were comparing him to Portugese Ronaldo which is bad, you're comparing him to Brazilian Ronaldo
Its such an outlandish argument i don't even feel the need to offer any counter points, any one with common sense will know Nunez won't reach that level, there are other players like Batistuta, Cavani, Drogba, Falcao, Torres, who present a more realistic comparison, not phenoms like Messi and R9, who pop up ever 20 years or so(if you're lucky).