Author Topic: VAR! Video Assistant Referee & Shite Referees in General  (Read 1352167 times)

Offline Wullie160975

  • Oor Wullie! Your Wullie! A'body's Wullie!
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,492
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14920 on: May 28, 2022, 10:34:17 pm »
Has there been any lines shown for the goal?

Offline Red-Soldier

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 16,719
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14921 on: May 28, 2022, 10:36:16 pm »
Has there been any lines shown for the goal?

No, looked very close to me.

The ref was a disgrace.

Online farawayred

  • Whizz For Atomms. Nucular boffin. A Mars A Day Helps Him Work, Rest And Play
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 26,797
  • Oh yes, I'm a believer!
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14922 on: May 28, 2022, 11:03:15 pm »
No, looked very close to me.

The ref was a disgrace.
The goal was not offside. Trent didn't know where Vini was and tried to keep the line, but he failed. He covered him for sure.
Cruyff: "Victory is not enough, there also needs to be beautiful football."

Offline whtwht

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 4,947
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14923 on: May 28, 2022, 11:05:37 pm »
The goal was not offside. Trent didn't know where Vini was and tried to keep the line, but he failed. He covered him for sure.

Them the small margins. Proud of our boys
He'll win the league in the next 3 years. Quote me on that.
Quote me on this, but come next season he'll be great for us. Just needs to remove the walking headless chicken next to him

Offline Hazell

  • Ultimate Movie Night Draft Winner 2017. King - or Queen - of Mystery. Hyzenthlay. The 5th Benitle's sex conch.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 76,966
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14924 on: May 28, 2022, 11:08:06 pm »
Being reffed like a PL match vs AD.

We didn't lose because of the ref but it does get frustrating when refs don't book them for their cynical fouls, fall for their timewasting antics and play no additional injury time. It's not one huge decision that refs get wrong, it's lots of little ones that are frustrating.
We have to change from doubter to believer. Now.

Offline Mister Flip Flop

  • More flop than flip.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 9,791
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14925 on: May 28, 2022, 11:09:41 pm »
The goal was not offside. Trent didn't know where Vini was and tried to keep the line, but he failed. He covered him for sure.

How do we know it wasn't offside? I haven't seen one replay and i find it strange.
Soccer - let's face it, its not really about a game of ball anymore is it?

Offline RedG13

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 6,896
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14926 on: May 28, 2022, 11:10:36 pm »
No, looked very close to me.

The ref was a disgrace.
CBS had a good angle of it and was clear he was on. VIni Jr did a great job of staying onside. Not really much Trent could.

Online farawayred

  • Whizz For Atomms. Nucular boffin. A Mars A Day Helps Him Work, Rest And Play
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 26,797
  • Oh yes, I'm a believer!
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14927 on: May 28, 2022, 11:10:46 pm »
How do we know it wasn't offside? I haven't seen one replay and i find it strange.
You can use the lines in the grass.
Cruyff: "Victory is not enough, there also needs to be beautiful football."

Online Ghost Town

  • RAWK snitch. Bands won't play no more. Too much fighting on the dance floor! Probably one of only three people who knows the meaning of "depuratory", the Suzy Dent-esque freakshow! Hannoying homunculus.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,899
  • mundus vult decipi
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14928 on: May 29, 2022, 12:09:59 am »
Turpin was a Dick
"Every man has a right to utter what he thinks truth, and every other man has a right to knock him down for it."
Samuel (not Glen) Johnson, as reported by James (not Joey) Boswell. They must have foreseen RAWK ;D

Offline stevieG786

  • Prefers bottom.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,273
  • AWWW YA BEAUTY!!
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14929 on: May 29, 2022, 12:20:33 am »
How do we know it wasn't offside? I haven't seen one replay and i find it strange.



Trent’s toe kept him inside

Offline Crosby Nick

  • He was super funny. Used to do these super hilarious puns
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 112,073
  • Poultry in Motion
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14930 on: May 29, 2022, 07:02:56 am »
We didn't lose because of the ref but it does get frustrating when refs don't book them for their cynical fouls, fall for their timewasting antics and play no additional injury time. It's not one huge decision that refs get wrong, it's lots of little ones that are frustrating.

Yeah, bought plenty of cheap free kicks in the last 15 minutes, especially the Courtois head injury one. Made subs only by one (as is their right), couple more stoppages in injury time and still blew bang on 5 minutes. Same happened to City which we found funnier. You could argue we would t have scored no matter how much longer we’d played but would have been nice to have the chance.

Offline kennedy81

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 24,282
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14931 on: May 29, 2022, 09:57:56 am »


Trent’s toe kept him inside
What about when Valverde plays the cross in?

Offline Iska

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 8,136
  • The only club that matters
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14932 on: May 29, 2022, 10:08:21 am »


Trent’s toe kept him inside
Thanks.  Thought there might have been really close and was surprised they didn’t keep showing a replay, but that explains why they didn’t spend much time on it.

Offline andyrol

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,463
  • might bring you boys a rabbit up in the week
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14933 on: May 30, 2022, 08:18:09 am »
I've seen pics where it shows Benzema touching the cross, he is clearly offside.  Never mind the rumour that the ref is Benzema's cousin!!!

Offline Dr Stu-Pid

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Kopite
  • ******
  • Posts: 762
  • ******
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14934 on: May 30, 2022, 09:56:00 am »


This image for me is a great example of why I think the current offside laws are fundamentally broken and have gone too far towards benefiting the attackers.  There is no way that anyone can say that Benzema is not affecting play here, and he is definitely in an offside position.  Konate has stopped his run to play Benzema offside, and has done so successfully.  As a result he is not in a position to block the cross.  Trent also looks to be stopping his run to try and hold the same line as Konate to play Benzema offside, which means he also can’t deal with the cross.  All that would be fine if someone in between Valverde and Benzema scores the goal, as Konate and Trent cannot affect that player, but Vinicius is only in a position to score because of the actions of Benzema who is between him and the ball.

The ball also gets VERY close to Benzema, and he adjusts his feet in a way that makes me think that he was trying to flick the ball towards goal but missed it, in which case there is a very good argument that he was offside under the current rules as well.  His actions at that point also have an affect on Alisson’s ability to save the shot from Vinicius, as he has to cover his front post in case Benzema gets a touch.  If Benzema isn’t there then Alisson can drop across his goal more and maybe he gets a hand on the shot and makes a wonder save.

The offside rules need to account for the fact that players who do not touch the ball can still have a massive influence on the game, especially since more and more we are seeing players deliberately making runs into an offside position to confuse defenders or attempt to get them to hold their line to play them offside to benefit someone making a later run (especially from set pieces).

Offline Elzar

  • train station gate frustration - delia smith fan club founder ('ave it!)
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 24,179
  • Bam!
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14935 on: May 30, 2022, 10:00:24 am »


The offside rules need to account for the fact that players who do not touch the ball can still have a massive influence on the game, especially since more and more we are seeing players deliberately making runs into an offside position to confuse defenders or attempt to get them to hold their line to play them offside to benefit someone making a later run (especially from set pieces).

Benzema was good at this, he uses the current laws to his advantage against a high line and tried a few times on Saturday. That one that dropped to Casemiro being a good example. Benzema was clearly off from the original cross, but had it come off Casemiro and to him, he would have been counted as on side. I remember City scoring few like this with their cut back tactics in the last couple years too.

A clever striker/team can use it to their advantage massively.
We already have shit in the country, and the game of Liverpool fills life with joy. Thanks

Offline oojason

  • The Official RAWK Audio Visual God. Founder Member of the Ricky Gervais' 'David Brad Fan Club'.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 24,042
  • The Awkward Squad
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14936 on: June 6, 2022, 11:13:00 am »
.
A video of the goal (with slow-motion replay) that claims the ball touched Benzema's foot (who was in an offside position) on the cross for the goal by Vinicius:-

https://twitter.com/eurocnfleague/status/1531325975383838720



'Ball clearly touched benzema foot who was offside vardrid at it again robbed':-










a slow-motion gif of the ball touching Benzema's foot in an offside position:-

https://twitter.com/sowso0/status/1532744594798034945






^ from https://twitter.com/eurocnfleague/status/1530774099743518720

« Last Edit: June 6, 2022, 05:02:50 pm by oojason »
.
Some 'Useful Info' for following the football + TV, Streams, Highlights & Replays etc - www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=345769

A mini-index of RAWK's 'Liverpool Audio / Video Thread' content over the years; & more - www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=345769.msg17787576#msg17787576

Offline KevLFC

  • Doesn't know the offside laws
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,617
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14937 on: June 6, 2022, 03:16:43 pm »
That would be really hard to spot even with VAR

Offline El Lobo

  • Chief Suck Up. Feel his breath on your face. Toxic, pathetic, arse-faced, weaselling slimeball. RAWK Maths Genius 2022.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 54,990
  • Pretty, pretty, pretty pretty good
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14938 on: June 6, 2022, 03:31:02 pm »
That and the disallowed goal just demonstrate what a fuck up the offside rule is, never mind VAR. Annoying if he did touch it but if you showed me that goal and the disallowed one, before VAR got involved, and told me one would be given and one wouldn't I'd have taken that so it doesn't really sting or anything.
If he's being asked to head the ball too frequently - which isn't exactly his specialty - it could affect his ear and cause an infection. Especially if the ball hits him on the ear directly.

Offline BoRed

  • BoRing
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,938
  • BoRac
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14939 on: June 6, 2022, 04:10:56 pm »
That would be really hard to spot even with VAR

It's not even conclusive enough, the ball often bobbles on an uneven pitch.

We've been robbed by VAR a few times this season, but this wasn't one of them.

Offline Dull Tools

  • Likes James Corden.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 3,377
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14940 on: June 6, 2022, 05:02:24 pm »
It's not even conclusive enough, the ball often bobbles on an uneven pitch.

We've been robbed by VAR a few times this season, but this wasn't one of them.
Even if he hasn't then how isn't he interfering with play? He has tried to touch the ball even if he doesn't actually manage to.

Offline Crimson

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,115
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14941 on: June 6, 2022, 05:41:20 pm »
As a general rule, such close calls should go in the attackers favour. There's no way to spot if the ball touched him even on the "slow motion". Not offside for me.
I have no idea what I’m taking about

Offline Barneylfc∗

  • Cross-dressing man-bag wielding golfer. Wannabe Mod. Coprophiliac. Would like to buy an airline seat if he could. Known 'grass'. Wants to go home to He-Man
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 60,039
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14942 on: June 6, 2022, 08:51:58 pm »
Even if he hasn't then how isn't he interfering with play? He has tried to touch the ball even if he doesn't actually manage to.

Quote
Offside offence

A player in an offside position at the moment the ball is played or touched* by a team-mate is only penalised on becoming involved in active play by:
interfering with play by playing or touching a ball passed or touched by a team-mate or
interfering with an opponent by:
preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by clearly obstructing the opponent’s line of vision or
challenging an opponent for the ball or
clearly attempting to play a ball which is close when this action impacts on an opponent or
making an obvious action which clearly impacts on the ability of an opponent to play the ball

He definitely doesn't make any attempt to play the ball, nor does he prevent any of our players playing the ball
Craig Burnley V West Ham - WEST HAM WIN - INCORRECT

Offline Ray K

  • Loves a shiny helmet. The new IndyKalia.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 35,877
  • Truthiness
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14943 on: June 25, 2022, 02:47:45 pm »
@SamWallaceTel
Exclusive: PGMOL conference this weekend are being told that referees’ chief Mike Riley will be leaving the organisation next season. Massive changes coming to Premier League refereeing.

Exclusive: Howard Webb to return from MLS as Mike Riley's de facto successor next season, as PGMOL chief refereeing officer. Will be a handover period when pair work together. Story with @Tom_Morgs

(Expected to be in the role full time by Christmas)
****
Webb isn't the greatest, but literally anybody would be better than Mike Riley.
"We have to change from doubters to believers"

Twitter: @rjkelly75

Offline Dave McCoy

  • "Don't you know who I am?!"
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,462
  • 11,053ft up
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14944 on: June 25, 2022, 02:56:18 pm »
@SamWallaceTel
Exclusive: PGMOL conference this weekend are being told that referees’ chief Mike Riley will be leaving the organisation next season. Massive changes coming to Premier League refereeing.

Exclusive: Howard Webb to return from MLS as Mike Riley's de facto successor next season, as PGMOL chief refereeing officer. Will be a handover period when pair work together. Story with @Tom_Morgs

(Expected to be in the role full time by Christmas)
****
Webb isn't the greatest, but literally anybody would be better than Mike Riley.

Webb, by all accounts, has done a great job in managing refs in MLS. This should be a clear upgrade has to be the hope.

Offline Hazell

  • Ultimate Movie Night Draft Winner 2017. King - or Queen - of Mystery. Hyzenthlay. The 5th Benitle's sex conch.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 76,966
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14945 on: June 25, 2022, 02:59:06 pm »
Webb, by all accounts, has done a great job in managing refs in MLS. This should be a clear upgrade has to be the hope.

But there's no Man Utd in the MLS :P
We have to change from doubter to believer. Now.

Offline El Lobo

  • Chief Suck Up. Feel his breath on your face. Toxic, pathetic, arse-faced, weaselling slimeball. RAWK Maths Genius 2022.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 54,990
  • Pretty, pretty, pretty pretty good
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14946 on: June 25, 2022, 03:00:00 pm »
Perfect timing  ::)
If he's being asked to head the ball too frequently - which isn't exactly his specialty - it could affect his ear and cause an infection. Especially if the ball hits him on the ear directly.

Offline tubby

  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 25,194
  • Destroyed Cowboy
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14947 on: June 25, 2022, 03:00:33 pm »
Webb being away from the PL for a while might make for a better ref boss, but who knows.  It can't be any worse than it already is though.
Sit down, shock is better taken with bent knees.

Offline Zlen

  • Suspicious of systems. But getting lots.
  • RAWK Scribe
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 19,019
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14948 on: June 25, 2022, 03:07:33 pm »
Blind chimp would do a better job than Mike Riley, so a clear upgrade.

Online Ghost Town

  • RAWK snitch. Bands won't play no more. Too much fighting on the dance floor! Probably one of only three people who knows the meaning of "depuratory", the Suzy Dent-esque freakshow! Hannoying homunculus.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,899
  • mundus vult decipi
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14949 on: June 25, 2022, 03:16:45 pm »
All those old photoshops of Webb in Man Utd kits will have a new lease of life.

God, we all thought we were so cool and edgy with those back then ;D
"Every man has a right to utter what he thinks truth, and every other man has a right to knock him down for it."
Samuel (not Glen) Johnson, as reported by James (not Joey) Boswell. They must have foreseen RAWK ;D

Offline xbugawugax

  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,283
  • We all Live in a Red and White Kop
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14950 on: June 25, 2022, 03:37:21 pm »
Blind chimp would do a better job than Mike Riley, so a clear upgrade.

lol...if howard webb is an upgrade then we shall all despair at the standard of officiating

names will change but doubt the standards will. isn't moss on permanent VAR duty next season?

Nothing will change. You heard it here first. The incompetent monkeys will defend their own surely.

Offline Armchair expert

  • Almost makes you agree with Gove
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,915
  • Meet the new boss.....same as the old boss
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14951 on: June 25, 2022, 03:48:50 pm »
Webb being away from the PL for a while might make for a better ref boss, but who knows.  It can't be any worse than it already is though.

Bad news for us….
Among other things that c*nt cost us the league in 2008 with one of the most corrupt penalty decisions you will ever see when Spurs were two up against Utd ….

Offline oojason

  • The Official RAWK Audio Visual God. Founder Member of the Ricky Gervais' 'David Brad Fan Club'.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 24,042
  • The Awkward Squad
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14952 on: June 25, 2022, 04:09:24 pm »

Howard Webb, eh? the man who spouts bollocks why he chose not to send off Nigel De Jong for his karate kick on Xabi Alonso in the 2010 World Cup Final.

Despite Webb can see De Jong was not even looking at the ball, he is looking at Alonso, catches him with force and studs to his chest, and with no attempt to even play the ball.

And then claimed "I hadn't seen point of impact" and "It never crossed my mind that it was red" - despite video evidence pointing to Webb looking directly at the incident, and being quick to give a yellow card without asking for advice or input from other match officials he was linked up with.





"I hadn't bottled out of the big decision, I hadn't felt intimidated by the occasion, and I'd certainly not felt under any pressure from FIFA to curb dismissals. I'd simply handed out the appropriate penalty for what I'd seen with my own eyes, from my vantage point. And that's the truth." - https://en.as.com/en/2016/10/18/soccer/1476807082_115329.html



<a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/CexJn5kg-90" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/CexJn5kg-90</a>

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/AcIicsfW660" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/AcIicsfW660</a>


Sorry, I may have gone off on one there ;D

« Last Edit: March 10, 2024, 09:45:41 pm by oojason »
.
Some 'Useful Info' for following the football + TV, Streams, Highlights & Replays etc - www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=345769

A mini-index of RAWK's 'Liverpool Audio / Video Thread' content over the years; & more - www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=345769.msg17787576#msg17787576

Offline afc tukrish

  • How long for them sausages? Maggie May's Mythical Turkish Delight. RAWK's Expert Sausage Monster! Oakley Cannonier is fucking boss. Likes blowing his friends and undoing their nuts? Who nose?!
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 16,943
  • This looks like a nice spot...
    • Flat Back Four
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14953 on: June 25, 2022, 04:10:50 pm »
Howard Webb, eh? the man who spouts bollocks why he chose not to send off Nigel De Jong for his karate kick on Xabi Alonso in the 2010 World Cup Final.

Despite Webb can see De Jong was not even looking at the ball, he is looking at Alonso, catches him with force and studs to his chest, and with no attempt to even play the ball.

And claimed "I hadn't seen point of impact" and "It never crossed my mind that it was red" - despite video evidence pointing to Webb looking directly at the incident, and being quick to give a yellow card without asking for advice or input from other match officials he was linked up with.

"I hadn't bottled out of the big decision, I hadn't felt intimidated by the occasion, and I'd certainly not felt under any pressure from FIFA to curb dismissals. I'd simply handed out the appropriate penalty for what I'd seen with my own eyes, from my vantage point. And that's the truth." - https://en.as.com/en/2016/10/18/soccer/1476807082_115329.html

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/CexJn5kg-90" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="bbc_link bbc_flash_disabled new_win">https://www.youtube.com/v/CexJn5kg-90</a>

^ and also at www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcIicsfW660


Sorry, I may have gone off on one there ;D


 :lmao
Since haste quite Schorsch, but Liverpool are genuine fight pigs...

Offline Dave McCoy

  • "Don't you know who I am?!"
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 7,462
  • 11,053ft up
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14954 on: June 25, 2022, 04:13:43 pm »
Pretty sure this article was posted many, many pages ago.

https://www.espn.com/soccer/major-league-soccer/story/4376693/howard-webb-on-how-mls-is-getting-var-right-and-what-other-leagues-can-learn

He does say the De Jong decision was wrong.

Offline Tonyh8su

  • Tonyign0r35u
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 5,814
  • YNWA
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14955 on: June 25, 2022, 04:24:20 pm »
Riley should’ve been fired a long time ago anyway but, after that Rodri handball not given against Everton his head, the on field ref and the VAR ref should’ve all been sacked.

Offline El Lobo

  • Chief Suck Up. Feel his breath on your face. Toxic, pathetic, arse-faced, weaselling slimeball. RAWK Maths Genius 2022.
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 54,990
  • Pretty, pretty, pretty pretty good
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14956 on: June 25, 2022, 04:35:56 pm »
All those old photoshops of Webb in Man Utd kits will have a new lease of life.

God, we all thought we were so cool and edgy with those back then ;D

Jonjo Shelvey was a true pioneer
If he's being asked to head the ball too frequently - which isn't exactly his specialty - it could affect his ear and cause an infection. Especially if the ball hits him on the ear directly.

Online Ghost Town

  • RAWK snitch. Bands won't play no more. Too much fighting on the dance floor! Probably one of only three people who knows the meaning of "depuratory", the Suzy Dent-esque freakshow! Hannoying homunculus.
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 14,899
  • mundus vult decipi
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14957 on: June 25, 2022, 04:53:23 pm »
Jonjo Shelvey was a true pioneer
Ah ha yes, I remember now. He got fined for that, I think?

And he also told Ferguson to fuck off didn't he? Good old Voldemort.
"Every man has a right to utter what he thinks truth, and every other man has a right to knock him down for it."
Samuel (not Glen) Johnson, as reported by James (not Joey) Boswell. They must have foreseen RAWK ;D

Offline LallanaInPyjamas

  • Keita's shit, Bundesliga's shit, Bundesliga 2's shit
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 8,689
  • RAWK Cheltenham 2020 Champion Tipster*
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14958 on: June 25, 2022, 05:03:11 pm »
Jonjo Shelvey was a true pioneer

Didn't the Babelcoptor do it first?  ;D

Online farawayred

  • Whizz For Atomms. Nucular boffin. A Mars A Day Helps Him Work, Rest And Play
  • RAWK Supporter
  • Legacy Fan
  • ******
  • Posts: 26,797
  • Oh yes, I'm a believer!
Re: VAR! Video Assistant Referee - It's not for everyone / Bit shit innit?
« Reply #14959 on: June 25, 2022, 05:18:32 pm »
@SamWallaceTel
Exclusive: PGMOL conference this weekend are being told that referees’ chief Mike Riley will be leaving the organisation next season. Massive changes coming to Premier League refereeing.

Exclusive: Howard Webb to return from MLS as Mike Riley's de facto successor next season, as PGMOL chief refereeing officer. Will be a handover period when pair work together. Story with @Tom_Morgs

(Expected to be in the role full time by Christmas)
****
Webb isn't the greatest, but literally anybody would be better than Mike Riley.
This personnel change will ensure continuity



But still, Howard Webb was a much better referee than Mike Fucking Riley.
Cruyff: "Victory is not enough, there also needs to be beautiful football."