Firstly having a really top coach like Klopp helps you attract the top players, it helps you retain the top players and above all a top coach has the kind of personality that creates a winning mentality. Does anyone for example think we would have been able to attract the likes of VVD without Klopp. I mean could you imagine Rodgers getting Gerrard to ring Virg and convince him to turn down City and Chelsea to join us.
Could you imagine us keeping our elite players like Salah for pretty much the best years of his career without someone like Klopp. Players stay because they love playing for Klopp. He creates an environment in which everyone feels involved and we have a great dressing room.
It certainly doesn't hurt, but Isak and Guimares came to Newcastle to play under Howe and Kudus and Paqueta came to West Ham to play under Moyes. So the manager clearly isn't the be all and end all when it comes to player transfers.
I'm not sure who you'd want as the next Liverpool manager though, Al? I think there's only four managers with similar/equivalent CV's to Klopp:
Guardiola - Not coming here
Ancelotti - Not coming here
Simeone - Expensive and his pantomime villain act isn't right for us. Awful style of football
Mourinho - Toxic has been
Enrique - Is he viable? I don't know. Less than a year in and he's got PSG to a CL semi-final
I agree that LFC should get the best available manager to take over from Klopp, but who would that be in your eyes? I see lots of criticism of the Rodgers appointment but not much from you on what you think we ought to be doing as a club with nearly £600m revenue.
I also agree that part of me finds it galling that our club can get "outspent" by Arsenal. But on the other hand I find it far more satisfying that we only paid £35m for Mac Allister instead of the £100m he's clearly worth (as dictated by the market).