Is it really necessary for the BBC and Sky websites to have a graphic image (albeit pixelated) showing bodies on the floor from the incident on their main page of the story?
I just find that really unnecessary and insensitive to the victims and their families.
They don't give a fuck, sensitivity went out the window a long time ago, like SP said above, all it is to them is a game of keeping the audiences watching and listening.
I had a reporter call me after the Westminster attack asking for any photos or footage I had of people looking 'happy' in the area from my work, for a segment which was titled 'we are taking back our bridge' - I shit you not.
There was a bit of a parody earlier of a bbc journalist interviewing a guy nearby who said after hearing the explosion 'my journalistic instincts kicked in' and he rushed to the scene getting as much information from people running from the area as possible. He worked in a local radio station but obviously felt this was his chance at a big break and instead of staying well away from the area as police told us, he went straight there, didn't offer help but tried to record as much of it as possible. Where is your head at sticking a voice recorder at people running from a disaster instead of trying to help?
Then you get the trolls on social media sharing fake pictures, they are at the top end of the scale but social and normal media as a whole is built around this, getting as much attention as possible and this is what people are lowered to.
Sorry to moan on, there's more important things at hand, but can't help despise the leeches and hangers on to these tragic events.