I was very critical on Gerrard in the holding role, actually I think he is useless there BECAUSE he offers this very top quality only few players in every country are able to offer in terms of pure talent to make use best in an attacking role. And this talent puts them above any okish striker like Lambert who is, to be honest, an average striker.
Was he useless there last season when we came second? We've seen him play in many positions throughout his career and frequently excel.
I'm not trying to denigrate Gerrard, I'm really not. He's been a force of nature. I just can't get behind the idea that he is a better
finisher than someone who has spent their entire career as a striker.
I agree that Lambert is basically an average striker, not arguing at all on that count, there is a reason he's third choice. But the post I initially replied to invoked Gerrard as a better
finisher. When do you see him slotting one home in the six yard box? Or generally, even much inside the penalty area at all? I know he hasn't played that far forward since 2009, but despite having fantastic technique, finishing is not at a striker's level, otherwise he could have played as one. And despite all the positions he has played in his career, striker is not really one of them, is it?
Not trying to say Lambert is superior at any other aspect of his game. Gerrard is obviously a million times better at all the other tasks required of a footballer. Not saying Gerrard is inferior as an attacking force either, I wasn't questioning that. But generally, Gerrard isn't the man on the end of moves,
finishing them (neither is Lambert at the moment to be fair
). That was the only point I was replying to in the first place.